Mihos vs. Hub Politics

Comments

1. rightmiddleleft says

   May 14, 2006 at 8:18 am

   The Mihos campaign is OFF THE DEEP END with a threat of libel.  Rather than  giving a simple explanation of a related business website or admitting an honest mistake they have threatened a lowly little blog with a lawsuit. The blog then folds like an old suit.Maybe Christy is panicking because the public is starting to figure him out! To bring attention to something as minor as this infraction is strange indeed. History has proven that the coverup is always much worse than the crime . So what are they really hiding when they have to threaten a  blog with libel? A “payment in kind” is not a big deal in a campaign if upon discovery,  you correct it. Good people actually make honest mistakes. Correct an honest mistake and it goes away.
   Hmmm , there is more to this story if they are so concerned that they have to threaten a lawsuit to keep it quiet.Are there more “payments in kind ” that you have not disclosed Christy?BMG should not let this story die because it will certainly chill the blogs from disclosing any factual information and commenting thereon with random threats of libel.From a one day regulatory story we are now dealing with freedom of speech and a judgement issue here. Thanks Christy for your lack of judgement and thanks Charley for bringing the story to our attention.I wonder if we continue to thread this story Christy will demand all of the IP Addresses at BMG.

2. peter-porcupine says

   May 14, 2006 at 12:02 pm

   When I originally commented on this on Hub Poitics, I said, big deal – write a letter to OCPF and find out how to report something that was done – probably to prevent cybersquatting – before the campaign was officially organized with OCPF.

   <

   p>
   Now, I have to wonder.  You have your actions and ideas questioned on the campaign trail ALL THE TIME, and being a candidate instead of an authority (no turnpike pun intended) doesn’t seem to agree with Mihos.

   <

   p>
   Unless the Margoli stumbled upon the tip of a REALY BIG iceberg of unreported activity.

3. mrscamille says

   May 16, 2006 at 10:24 am

   I’m writing to your blog hoping to remove any doubt about what happened in regards to the ownership of the christymihos.net website.  The reason I am doing this is it has personally effected me and my husband, Kenneth Camille.  It also greatly impacts, and in a very negative way, Christy Mihos, a man my husband and I both respect, admire and work for. 

   <

   p>  I am going to give you the facts, and my intentions are to clarify the situation so that political discussion can turn back to debating Christy’s political views and/or his political ideas to get Massachusetts back on track, and not hyper-speculation and accusations of a campaign violation that never happened.  But I will be venting a bit first, as there are some things that have to be said prior to explaining what happened, in order to help every blogger out there know the differences in speculation and false accusation, along with some other internet facts and terminology.

   <

   p>
   What’s important for you ‘web savvy’ folks of hub politics to remember, always, is that out here in cyberspace things are sometimes not what they appear to be or mean in text.  I also need to express to hubpolitics that although they are semi-web-savvy, they stated (and continue to state) that christymihos.net was a mirror site when it was actually what is called a url-forwarding (this can be verified through dotster.)  The semi-web-savvy hub-politics also may not be aware that you can set up a company name on domain registration using just about any name you want, even using ‘Jerry Springer Audience Enterprises’, which is pretty much what reading some of the blogs and comments about this felt equivalent to for those that knew the facts and knew of the human element involved within what happened.  Funny and entertaining at times, but not so funny if you knew the facts and considered the potential that some would believe the false information and make an important decision in regards to voting based upon that false information.

   <

   p>
   Not to tease you hub politics guys, I’ve had your blog on favorites for quite a while and enjoy the crunchy, cutting-edge way you tackle every ‘scandal’ you can find, but I did get a giggle out of hearing you call yourselves web savvy and then not understand the difference between a mirrored website and a url forwarding.  I think you made quite a few internet geeks laugh at that unintentional comedy element.  Laughing with you, not at you, as we all were ‘noobs’ at one time or another. 😉

   <

   p>  I don’t agree with the majority of what is written on hub politics, but it is a great read at times, which is why it has been bookmarked for a while. I do give hub politics kudos for knowing how to word things in such a way that make it enjoyable to read.  Everything taken with a grain of salt, so to speak, as cynical and biased rantings can be interesting to read, even more so when they are well written. 

   <

   p>
   Even more so if they are fact, but in this case they were not fact.  Which of course makes me wonder… how much of what I have read on hub politics was actually accurate?  Were the facts twisted or not thoroughly investigated and/or disregarded as they were in the case of my husband, Kenneth Camille?  As they were in regards in Christy Mihos and a ‘possible campaign violation’? 

   <

   p>
   Never thought I’d see my family’s home addy and phone number on hub politics, wish you’d called up to clarify the situation before you posted our information which then ended up all over the place with false accusations towards my husband and Christy Mihos.  A phonecall would have resulted in getting the facts before putting to text extremely false information and accusations. 

   <

   p>  The human element within this form of internet interaction sometimes gets lost in the mix.  I completely understand how and why it could be assumed that Christy’s of Cape Cod LLC owned the website in question/debate.  It would, to the eye and mind, appear that way.  Using logic alone, I can see how one would come to those conclusions.  And although this doesn’t happen often online or even offline, the human organ needed most to understand the facts of what happened isn’t just the eyes or the mind. It’s the heart.

   <

   p>
   The heart of the internet is found behind each computer monitor.  In this case, it’s the heart of my husband, who is such a good man and who did some good deeds that have been turned into this slanderous and inaccurate small mess. 

   <

   p>
   The truth is vital.  The heart of things plays a role in truth sometimes and is vital out here, even though we often forget.  It’s the heart of Christy Mihos, who is such a good man and who did nothing wrong, but found himself accused of some very serious allegations.  It’s the heart of every political candidate running for office in Massachusetts this year, candidates I’m certain would not feel comfortable with votes garnered through false information and false accusations towards their political opponents.  There’s not a politician out there who has not been a victim of either media or internet slandering and false information at one point or another.  My heart goes out to each of them.  We know now how that feels, as we were dragged into this one personally.

   <

   p>
   I think it’s safe to say that people who read political blogs are registered voters who intend to vote at elections.  I also think it’s safe to say that people who read political blogs are hoping to obtain information, valid information, with which they make their decision on what candidate to vote for.  I think it’s important that watch-dogging happens, and I applaud hubpolitics for doing what they thought was right, in revealing a suspected violation.  The wording used, however, was presented as fact in some instances, when it was not fact at all.  Speculation and investigating is great and needed in politics, but stating something as fact that has not been thoroughly investigated and proven fact is in nobody’s best interest.  Not hub politic’s best interest, not in the voters’ best interest either.

   <

   p>
   So, back to the heart of this matter.  My husband has worked for Christy’s of Cape Cod for over a dozen years.  He started as a part timer, moved up to assistant manager and then manager.  He at one point was managing three stores, and was looking for a way to make the application process easier for workers, so he purchased with his own money (which can be verified through our credit card and dotster) a domain name to set up a website for Christy’s of Cape Cod.  Using his own time and inclination, he put together a website for the company he worked for, respected and believed in.  He’d let people at the office know he did this, but did not want compensation for it nor did he request any help (financial or otherwise) for it.  It was just something he did in order to make things run smoother for himself and the company.  That’s the kind of man my husband is, and is a testament to the kind of people Christy Mihos is able to have work for him.  People who respect Mr. Mihos as sincerely as Mr. Mihos respects them.  At the time of setting up the dotster account, my husband put in the section of ‘company’ Christy’s of Cape Cod LLC, because that was the company he worked for and was designing a website for.  With his own money, on his own time, with no prompting from anybody to do it or any compensation, strictly through and of his own personal work ethics and desire to make things as easy as possible for employees, the company, and himself as a manager.  It was not done maliciously nor with fraudulent intent.

   <

   p>
   Fast forward a few years to autumn of last year, 2005.  When discussions about Mr. Mihos possibly running for governor hit the media, my husband and I, as employees but more so as individuals who respect Mr. Mihos, were concerned that squatters would snatch up websites making it a bit more expensive to obtain a domain that was easy to remember for Christy’s campaign website.  So, without asking anybody’s permission and again using our own money, my husband bought the christymihos.net website.  We then emailed Mr. Mihos and let him know what we’d done and why we’d done it, and let Christy know that should he want the website, it was his for the taking, a gift to him for all the years of employment, an expression of gratitude for running a company that treated employees as respectfully and kindly as Mr. Mihos treats his employees. 

   <

   p>
   The only mistake, if it can even be called that, was a human error, and it was not a mistake made by Christy Mihos.  When my husband went to purchase the christymihos.net website, he used his already established dotster account, which, as you know, has the company name listed as the owner but it is not  in fact the owner, only the company my husband had put together a website for.  This is what has led to the confusion, and my husband and I apologize for the unintentional misrepresentation of the website’s ownership, as well as apologize to hub politics for creating a set of circumstances that would lead them to believe a violation had taken place, and we also extend our sincere and heartfelt apologies to Christy Mihos and his campaign staff, as this negative press and whatever  time, energy and resources utilized by his staff to deal with it would obviously have been better spent on the positive campaigning and not spent on false allegations of such a severe nature as a campaign violation. 

   <

   p>
   I think the Mihos campaign people had to deal with the two statements that, now you know, were outright lies, in the manner that they did.  I’m also against censorship and/or strong-arming a blogger into silence, but in this matter the wording of the two statements asked to be removed were indeed outright lies.  It’s one thing to speculate, and another thing to state something ‘is what it appears to be’ when appearances can be deceiving, especially out here in cyberspace.  Remember the human element… it’s where real web-savvy comes from.

   <

   p>
   In closing,  I hope each voter will continue to read blogs and media speculation with the wisdom garnered through this particular incident and self-propelled personal investigating that each of us as individuals must do in order to make a logical choice in political candidate.  I also hope that political platforms themselves get more debate and discussion going, as it is the political platforms that should matter to each of us most, that matter to how Massachusetts is going to continue to decline in population and rise in cost to each citizen.  How we vote this year is literally going to make or continue to break this state… the breaking down of Massachusetts is fact, not a speculation, as can be witnessed in every area of political, social and individual rights and financial costs.

   <

   p>
   I hope in no way does this one incident lead to anything but better (and more thorough) watch dogging and investigating of political candidates by bloggers and the media itself.  I personally do not wish to see any blogger get the plug pulled on them, but I also do not think stating patently false information that can be proven false (and this can) is a fair way to go about things.  It certainly isn’t legal, either.  Note that all the campaign staff requested was the removal of the 2 false statements.  They did not ask the speculation be removed.  And, ironically enough, in requesting hub politics remove the false statements, the Christy’s campaign was in effect protecting hub politics from a lawsuit that the Christy’s Mihos people could easily win, because the statements were lies/slander, as clarified by this personal letter to anyone reading these blogs.  If this is not enough to prove the facts, I will give to hub politics the necessary documentation of dotster account information, credit card and other paperwork proving that everything I have stated is fact.  I give hub politics permission to call our house to arrange a meeting to obtain that information, if further proof is desired.  You have our phone number. 

   <

   p>
   In case anybody was wondering, I was not asked by anybody to write this.  In fact, I think I’m going to get an earful from my husband for doing this, and maybe others, but I am doing this of my own accord, because I could no longer sit by and read what I had read and not stand up and speak out the facts about my husband whom I love and could not continue to watch his kind deeds being used in such a dark way, as well as to stand up for Christy Mihos, a man I respect and support politically.  I’d like the political exchanges to return to fact-based debates and discussion of political platforms and no further time wasted upon the false allegations.

   <

   p>
   Thanks for your time, I also apologize for the long-winded way I have of writing, it’s just my way. 

   <

   p>
   Respectfully,
   Mrs. Kenneth Camille