Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Rich and Richer…a Recipe for democratic disaster!!!!

August 23, 2006 By framinghamdem

I have not posted in a while I’ve been busy working and going to school at nights, but this just could not wait.

Just heard from a good friend who is a City Councilor from Lynn, who was leaning toward Gabrieli, but is a strong Murray supporter,  that he attended a town hall event for Chris, who he was prepared to endorse till he saw Goldberg at the event.  After watching how she worked the room along with Gabrieli staff (who made no attempts to stop her) he made the conclusion they look to be running as team. I personally like Chris and think he brings a lot of good ideas, but my vote is now totally going to Deval along with the City Councilor’s. What Chris and Deb look like they are doing is going to be a disaster for our party.

These two are going to make it so easy for the Republican ticket to look like the working class hero’s.  Healey and Hillman will work to paint themselves as having blue collar family roots, while Gabs and Goldy are two hugely wealthy; Harvard educated people who were only able to win because they bought the election. Not because they connected with the voters. Unenrolled voters who make up a large percentage of the votes will clearly support the working class ticket; I can even see union members voting for the republicans. Please Chris say you are not going to hurt the Democrats chances by teaming up with just a rich women from Brookline who does not bring any ideas or substance to the table, but she can surely bag groceries as we learned back in June. Chris do you want someone that can help the ticket and help advance polices or someone who can stack cans?  Can someone please explain the logic of Gabrieli helping to elect Deb?? Someone please talk some sense into the Gabrieli team ASAP, before we all get Governor Healey.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. renaissance-man says

    August 23, 2006 at 10:35 pm

    “After watching how she worked the room along with Gabrieli staff (who made no attempts to stop her) he made the conclusion they look to be running as team.”

    <

    p>
    I think you’ve find that most campaigns are somewhat friendly, especially when they are not direct competitors.

    <

    p>
    I think your friend read too much into the circumstances of that event…

    <

    p>
    By the way, why would anyone try to stop what another campaign was doing? These are public events and campaigns are entitled to do pretty much whatever they want, short of disrupting a speech.

  2. patricka says

    August 24, 2006 at 8:53 am

    ..and there was no sign of coordination among the campaigns.

    <

    p>
    I’m not sure Chris even got to say hi to Deb.

    <

    p>
    It was, as you said, a town hall forum, with Chris answering questions from audience members. It started about 6, and people continued to trickle into the room after it started. All of the seats were taken, so the Gabrieli staff was standing at the back of the room.

    <

    p>
    As I was looking for a friend who hadn’t showed up yet, I was panning the back of the room every few minutes. At about 6:30, I saw Deb Goldberg at the back of the room (near the Gabrieli staff), without the usual entourage of staff (probably just her and a driver), with no campaign signs around.

    <

    p>
    To be honest, I have no idea what she did after Chris stopped speaking, so I can’t say who she was going around the room with. From my vantage point, most of Chris’ staff seemed to be trying to pull him away from the crowd so that he could get up to Lowell for the next town hall meeting.

    <

    p>
    My guess is that Deb dropped in on her own (perhaps even unscheduled), looking for any political crowd to work.

    <

    p>
    I plan on writing up Chris’ town hall meeting as a separate post.

    <

    p>
    Disclosure: I am a Gabrieli and a Murray supporter, even though I voted for Goldberg at the convention to get her on the ballot.

    • vladimir says

      August 25, 2006 at 5:06 pm

      I was leaning toward Gabrieli and came to the event in Lynn to hear him in person. I liked what he was saying and now will definitely vote for him.

      <

      p>
      I came late and was standing at the back of the room when I saw Deb Goldberg entering the door. I’m strongly supporting Tim Murray and was shocked to see her there but nobody else paid any attention. So, she was standing at the back of the room the whole time. Chris, who obviously saw her (he was facing her while speaking), never even recognized her presence. At the end of the meeting he was surrounded by people and after about 10 minutes his staff pulled him out to go to another meeting. I don’t even know if they had a chance to say a few words to each other.

      <

      p>
      After the event she stayed outside trying to talk to people way after Chris left. She introduced herself to me and I told her that I was very surprised to see her at Gabrieli event. I asked her if that means that she is supporting Gabrieli now. She gave me a standard “they are all good candidates” reply and said that she was not far away from Lynn and came to the event to meet people. She mentioned that she was attending Patrick’s and Reilly’s events before. She was actually very nice in person compare to her strange TV ads but I still think Murray is better.

      <

      p>
      I’m sorry that someone changed his mind from Chris to Deval because of her visit but I guess people see things differently and make rush statements based on certain assumptions.

  3. alice-in-florida says

    August 24, 2006 at 10:12 am

    Like Mitt Romney and Bill Weld? As for Kerry Healy, you must be joking. I’m not following the campaign closely, but the notion that someone is disqualified because they have money is ass-backward, almost as silly as the idea that Republicans are “working class.”

    • gary says

      August 24, 2006 at 12:30 pm

      Upper Middle Income Quintile (Annual household income of approx. $58,000 to $92,000): The Republicans have a small edge over Democrats among all people in this bracket, 36%-31%, and a larger edge among whites, 40%-27%. Back in 1992, the GOP’s margins were smaller among all people (32%-29%) and among whites (34%-26%).

      Middle Income Quintile (Annual household income of approx. $35,000 to $58,000): Among whites in this bracket, Republicans have opened up an 8 percentage point margin over Democrats (36%-28%), up from the 4 percentage point margin the GOP enjoyed in 1992 (32%-28%). When nonwhites are included, the overall public in this income range is divided almost evenly (33% Democrat, 32% Republican).

      Lower Middle Income Quintile (Annual household income of approx. $19,000 to $35,000): Here is where the GOP gains have been strongest. Republicans still trail Democrats among all people in this bracket by 35%-28%, but the GOP now leads among whites in this bracket, by a slim 33%-29%. Back in 1992, the Democrats led the GOP among whites by 33%-28% and among all people by 38%-24%.

      <

      p>
      Source:  Pew research

      <

      p>
      Union support and working-class support are two very different notions.

      • alice-in-florida says

        August 24, 2006 at 1:53 pm

        about candidates. Big difference.

        • gary says

          August 24, 2006 at 2:06 pm

          different from them roll-up-your sleeve, blue collar Democrat working class folks:  John Kerry, Deborah Goldberg, Deval Patrick, Christopher Gabrieli, Ted Kennedy…

          • alice-in-florida says

            August 27, 2006 at 9:00 pm

            are different from regular people. Considering what it costs to run for office in this state/country, there are two kinds of people who can make it: those born wealthy, and those who become wealthy. Tom Reilly is the exception that I can see among Massachusetts candidates for governor this year, but he seems to be polling third for the primary.

  4. leonidas says

    August 24, 2006 at 11:24 am

    was quite funny: “for those of us without nannies, taking out trash is not noteworthy event”

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.