TO: Kerry Healy, Deval Patrick, and Christy Mihos FROM: Grace Ross
Dear fellow candidates for Governor,
I welcome Kerry Healy and Deval Patrick to their formal entry into the 2006 Massachusetts gubernatorial race. Likewise we are pleased to welcome Christy Mihos into this final stage of the season as well.
At this time our campaign is outlining our expectations for conduct for the rest of the electoral season. I have been proud to run for Governor of Massachusetts because of our long, revolutionary history and because I know that the people of Massachusetts are a just people, a moral people, and a compassionate people. Since the beginning, my platform has been based on working for equality and justice; including an end to racial discrimination and achieving equal rights for women. We believe that Massachusetts is more than ready, all things being equal, to have a woman for governor. Likewise we believe that Massachusetts is more than ready, all things being equal, to have a person of color as governor.
Decades ago, we won the right for women and people of color to participate fully in this electoral system. In honoring the people who gave up their lives for those rights we dont accept those rights being rolled back, ignored or trampled on.
I will, and I expect all the other candidates in this campaign, to stand up to any other candidate who tries to use an anti-people-of-color or anti-woman strategy to try to get elected the people of MA deserve, and should accept nothing less from the person asking to represent all of us.
Sincerely, Grace Ross and Campaign Green-Rainbow Party Candidate for Governor
Here is Healey’s speech:
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
Healey’s speech: a transcript
And of course, my greatest thanks goes to my family. My husband, Sean, my children Alex and Avril are here tonight- can you raise your hands? Thank you. I also extend my congratulation to Tom Reilly and Chris Gabrieli on campaigns well-run. And I just had the opportunity to speak to Deval Patrick and congratulate him on an excellent race.
Now Reed and I want to thank you for your votes and we want to thank you for your commitment to making a positive difference in this great state of Massachusetts. Beginning tonight, the choice facing voters in November finally comes into focus. This election will bring change to Massachusetts. But what kind of change? We will have an option. Will we have two party democracy and balance on Beacon Hill or go back to a time when the people’s business was done behind closed doors by just one party and will special interests coming before interests of the tax payers? Now that’s Deval Patrick’s kind of change.
Deval Patrick will change our tax rates, making them higher to satisfy the special interests he had to court in order to win in this primary. Is that the kind of change we want? Deval Patrick will change spending. He’s already promised to increase state expenditures higher than they’ve ever been before. Is the kind of change we want? And Deval Patrick will change our criminal justice laws- weakening them and reversing the bipartisan tough-on-crime progress that this state has made in the last decade. Is that the kind of change we want? Deval Patrick’s kind of change puts our economy at risk, scares away entrepreneurs and innovators that make our state a great place to live and raise a family, and it piles burden after burden on the small businesses that create half the jobs in Massachusetts. Deval Patrick’s prescription of higher taxes, more spending, and weaker criminal justice laws are just the type of change we can’t afford to make and it’s a risk we cannot take.
What’s the alternative? We can have my kind of change. Like each of you, my experiences have shaped by beliefs. It’s the big challenges and small victories along the way that have shaped my values and taught me what’s important and what’s worth fighting for. I grew up in Daytona Beach, Fla., and like families everywhere, we had our ups and downs. We had our years when my father couldn’t find work, times when every penny counted. We never took a vacation until I was 10-years-old because my father used his vacation time to go to army camp for the reserves. And when I was 15, my dad had a disabling heart attack and could never work again, but I could and I did. While I was in high school, I worked three jobs to help my mother and to save money for college, and one of the most important things that I learned during that time was that all honest work deserves respect. And I learned what it is to work for minimum wage and why getting an education is so important. Like all of you, I look at my paycheck every week and calculated how much time I had worked just to pay taxes. I know that there is work behind every dollar and the government should show more respect for that work. That’s why when I hear people saying that rolling back the income tax rate to 5 percent would only provide a couple hundred dollars in tax relief, and that won’t mean a thing to working families, I know they are dead wrong. $200 makes a big difference for people, whether it’s to cover the cost of groceries, purchase new school clothes, or set aside some emergency money in the savings account. A more affordable Massachusetts- that’s the kind of change I’ll bring.
When I was growing up, the one thing my parents never put a price on was the value of an education. For them, it was worth almost any sacrifice to help me get the best education I could. My mom was a public school teacher. She taught third grade until she retired and she never lets me forget the importance of public schools. She’s here tonight and I want to thank her for being my best teacher and mentor, thank you. Thank you for your love and support every step of the way.
I’m a graduate of public schools and I know first-hand the life-changing role public schools can play in kids’ lives if they’re filled with qualified teachers and a love of learning. The schools I attended weren’t the best and I worried about the lost talents of the kids who weren’t able to make it on their own. That’s why I’m such a strong supporter of public schools. But don’t mistake my support for satisfaction. We must do more to close the gap between our highest performing schools and our lowest. And I’m going to fight to provide more public school choice by lifting the cap on charter schools and we’ll fight to stop cold any effort to weaken the MCAS. I’m going to fight for merit pay for our best teachers and to give parents more information about how their kids are doing in school- that’s what we need to do. But I can tell you that these priorities aren’t welcome by the status quo on Beacon Hill and that’s why I’m convinced they’re not only needed, they’re necessary. And I’ll higher standards for public schools and more accountability- that’s the kind of change I’ll bring.
Public safety: it’s one of the most basic, but also one of the most important functions of government. When I was growing up, crime was a real problem in my community and it’s something that we always need to be vigilant about here in Massachusetts. Kids can’t learn if they’re scared at school. Parents don’t go to the park if they’re worried that there are drug dealers and sex offenders there. No one goes downtown to shop if they feel unsafe on the streets and businesses don’t open where there are no customers passing by. Public safety is the foundation for economic growth in all of our cities. Getting tougher on crime- that’s the kind of change I’m going to bring.
Now I’m asking all of you and all of the people of Massachusetts who want to make our state stronger, our future brighter, and bring the right kind of change to Beacon Hill, join us. We need your help to make this vision of our state a reality for everyone on November 7. Thank you, God bless you, and God bless this great Commonwealth of Massachuse
tts.
michael-forbes-wilcox says
Who does she think is going to use “an anti-people-of-color or anti-woman strategy” Deval Patrick? I don’t think so!
<
p>
This is very odd, coming from a candidate who has already used a “dirty tricks” whispering campaign against Deval Patrick, telling people here in the Berkshires that he supported the war in Iraq (a complete and utter falsehood!) and telling Patrick supporters that they ought to look into the Killer Coke accusations, and issuing similar slams (only in private conversations, never on the stage, at least in my experience, where Deval could defend himself) against his corporate background.
<
p>
I wish this candidate would spend more time talking about why she deserves a vote and less time worrying about what the other candidates do and say.
obroadhurst says
I find it hard to believe that Grace ever once indicated that Deval Patrick supports – or has supported – the war with Iraq.
<
p>
She may well have observed that he supported the state of Israel’s illegal and bloody war with Lebanon. That would be a fact.
alexwill says
I absolutely support the spirit of the letter, and believe that we should all be just as vigilant in denouncing any sexist arguments against Kerry Healey as we would with racist arguments against Deval Patrick.
<
p>
But, I am really confused by the poll here. I hadn’t paid much attention Healey’s victory speech, but went back to read through it a bit, but didn’t catch any thing racist. Is this a reference to another speech? or am I just completely missing it?
peter-porcupine says
I mean, she DOES get to oppose him, right? Even if he IS black?
centralmassdad says
your subconscious racist nature prevents you from seeing it. See how easy it is?
<
p>
Presumbaly, Healy cannot campaign against Patrick without oppressing him, and vice versa. They should just retreat to their respective castles (if doing so is not done to reinforce the class divisions in our society, but rather to protect themselves from the the social constructs required to run a “campaign” in our society that are themselves racist or sexist, as appropriate) and quietly contemplate injustice until mid-November.
soomprimal says
I know a lot of people were very nervous about the implications of this speech. We know Healey wants to strengthen CORI and the MCAS, two things that already disproportionately and negatively affect people of color. I don’t think Grace is going to allow this sort of platform not only to go unchallenged due to the merits, but also the racial problems involved in it.
goldsteingonewild says
That’s why the Barack Obama is strongly pro-standards and high-stakes tests.
<
p>
<
p>
He’s talking about you: he disagrees with you just as strongly as those on the right who are indifferent to school conditions.
<
p>
Pre-MCAS, black and Hispanic kids had low achievement, and we knew about it from low-stakes tests (like NAEP, Stanford 9, etc). Districts did little. Why bother?
<
p>
Post-MCAS, black and Hispanic kids get many more resources devoted to them because there is an urgency to raising their actual math and English skills.
<
p>
*Forward-thinking suburban school districts like Brookline make closing the gaps one of their highest priorities now. Sometimes teachers resist (see Sabutai’s post from today) change or accountability. Now more of them roll up their sleeves and help more kids.
<
p>
*Urban districts are able to galvanize more parents, church leaders, etc., in rolling up their sleeves to get kids to learn more.
gary says
There’s the disconnect between the conservative and the liberal:
<
p>
<
p>
That’s just a misstatement.
<
p>
Money does matter. Money to education, unarguably has increased nationwide and in Massachusetts. The conservative argument is that money, thrown at large institutions doesn’t trickle down to provide adequate change to an individual’s education.
<
p>
You teach kids one at a time, not as one homogenous group. The conservative’s solution is to allow lots of individual choices and encourage parental involvement.
<
p>
It’s unfair of you to generalize that “those on the right […] are indifferent to school conditions.”
<
p>
AND, I don’t blame the teachers–I blame the NEA and any other group that contributes to the growth of large, disconnected institutions.
goldsteingonewild says
gary –
<
p>
1. obama characterized conservatives that way, not me.
<
p>
2. my statement is much more limited. i said “Those on the right WHO are indifferent to school conditions.” by that i did not mean “All on the right…” which i think is apparent if you do not remove that one word and replace with ellipses. c’mon, splurge, cite all 10 of my words. it won’t drive up health care costs, i promise.
gary says
<
p>
Erk, 17 words copied and pasted…the pain. I’m suing.
goldsteingonewild says
while it’s the NEA has generally been anti-standards, it was AFT president Al Shanker who was a big help in driving the standards movement forward.