In some part of yesterday’s Globe there was a quote from some knucklehead on the Healey campaign that went something like this:
“Well, if Mihos did better than expected, that is good for us because he will take more votes from Patrick then from us. We aren’t going to get any of the anti-incumbent vote anyway.”
There is only one small problem with this logic. If the Healey camp is correct, and Patrick and Mihos are sort of splitting the anti-incumbent vote (if you can call 65/5 splitting) then:
Patrick: 65%
Mihos: 5%
Healey 25%
Ross: 1%
Undecided:4%
Healey’s camp is admitting that they are stuck at under 30%, since roughly 70% of the voters seem to be committed to one of the ‘anti-incumbent’ candidates, and the Healey camp is planning on getting their support anyway.
So where exactly is Kerry Healey going to pick up the votes that she needs to win?
Maybe she thinks she can pick off one tenth of Grace Ross’ one percent…
<
p>
If Patrick supporters have a voting record anything like Mr. Patrick, she won’t have to pick up many votes to win.
<
p>
Does he vote when it counts?
Where turnout was MUCH higher than forcast and where DP’s victory was bigger than forecast? How’s that for a voting history??? It’s also even really recent!
It’s simple: she attacks Patrick and builds up Grace Ross enough to wind up with exactly 25% for each of the four candidates. Now that she needs only one vote to break the tie…
<
p>
Drumroll…
<
p>
She gets Shonda Schilling to register before the 10/18 deadline!
<
p> – Dan
After a long day of teaching kids (and a school shooting down the street from my school), you’ve provided me with a much needed laugh. Good one, man! Very funny.