HT to David E., who notes Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack’s announcement that he’s running for president. Vilsack is the first Democrat to announce that he’s officially in the race.
I’m sure Vilsack has been a fine governor (not that I really know what he’s done out there) and would be a competent, and maybe more than competent, president. So why am I so unexcited by this announcement?
Please share widely!
johnk says
He’s a Democrat from Iowa which is a plus. Prior to Vilsack, Iowa had a Republican Governor for the previous 30 years. So we are not talking about liberal america. Could the West and South identify with someone from mid-west?
<
p>
He’s on the left on all the issues I could find, not a Heath Shuler type. Good jobs program, Educ, Insurance programs. He reduced state jobs over his 8 years, was able to reduce taxes to lower income and did this while not increasing taxes for the state. A few years back he started the Iowa Values Fund to spur additional job growth. He does leave a good record in Iowa. Some ideas that will help us domestically. The question is foreign policy, we don’t elect Senators much but could this be an overriding factor in 08 is the question.
<
p>
If you can’t tell already, I like him. He could sneak up on people. Doing well in the Iowa caucuses won’t hurt, he needs to get to NH. If he strings a couple good showing early and is considered a real candidate who knows what will happen.
joeltpatterson says
Oh, yeah, he’s got the excitement of a cornfield combined with the, the, the…
<
p>
…does Iowa have anything besides cornfields?
laurel says
swine aplenty. that’s what they grow all that corn for, don’t ya know!
jconway says
Vilsacks running for Vice President, not President, and I wish he had the candor to say so.
johnk says
johnk says
I think they got some cows too, plenty of fields to graze.
steven-leibowitz says
For one, that’s why Northeast liberal Dems get tagged with the elitism paint brush. And second, toss in the names of Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at the point those two first ran for much of the knee jerk cynicism one would have about a fairly obscure governor. I’ve got other fish in the sea I’m personally interested in, but there is plenty of room in the big tent for all sorts and many good ideas.
johnk says
“fish in the sea” comment a cheap shot against us New Englanders!!!
<
p>
I like Vilsack, sounds like i’m the only one. Why not him?
since1792 says
He showed up at a meeting in Boston of Deval’s finance committee –
<
p>
He spoke to us for about 10 minutes. Seemed like an interesting guy –
<
p>
I agree though – VP would be my guess here…..
fmozel says
One problem, I think, is that “Vilsack” just doesn’t sound very presidential.
Try saying “President Vilsack” out loud. Just doesn’t quite work, does it?
<
p>
-Some Guy
fmozel says
That wasn’t suppose to be a child of the previous post, oops
frankskeffington says
…all the more important–given that Vilsack shoud dominate.
thoover says
Anyone who uses the “final countdown” for a theme song is doomed to failure.
laurel says
Vilsack signed DOMA into Iowa law, and is quoted as saying “My view is the state ought to pretty much stay out of the church’s business. I think there is a religious connotation to marriage that needs to be respected and understood.”
<
p>
There is just so much wrong with a governor, let alone a candidate for prez, saying that civil marriage law is the domain of the church (whatever “the church” means). I suggest we look a little further. You know, for someone who actually understands the constitution.
johnk says
Thanks for the info.
bluetoo says
…that’s exactly the opposite of what I was thinking: my view is that the church ought to pretty much stay out of the state’s business.
johnk says
He is pro civil unions. But supports DOMA.