In the Georgetown University dormitory the night before the big moment, the newly minted Wellesley High graduate persuaded 49 of her 140 fellow scholars to sign a letter she and a dozen others had drafted and she had just written longhand on notebook paper, calling on President Bush to reject torture and treat terrorism suspects humanely.
Before the scholars posed for a photo with Bush on Monday, she handed him the letter. He put it in his pocket and took it out after the photo shoot. Reading silently to himself, the president looked up quizzically at Oye and said, according to her, “We agree. America doesn’t torture people.”
Thank you, Mari — and thanks to your 48 co-signers for standing up for human dignity. (Massachusetts represent!)
And as I’m sure you know, the President lied to your face. But what can you do? Only what you did. Shame on him, and shame on anyone who accepts, rationalizes or ignores our administration’s disgraceful behavior. You used your opportunity to speak truth to power well.
Again, my deepest gratitude.
jpsox says
I was trying to figure out if there was a way to write her a thank you letter when I read this morning that the ring leader was from Mass. This will have to do, hopefully somebody will point BMG’s thread out to her.
<
p>
Thank you Mari for your courage and principles, and for taking a stand when you had the chance. As a fellow college student, I’m extremely proud of you, and if you were coming to my quaker-influenced college (Swat) in the fall, you’d probably be an on-campus celebrity (whether you’d like it or not). You showed Bush, the Administration, and the country that intelligent young voters aren’t buying the crap they’ve been feeding us.
zumbooruk says
I’ll point it out to her. I’m really happy to be going to school with her in the same yale class of ’11.
zumbooruk says
she said she was accepted to and almost went to swat! :O
raj says
…from what I had read–and the way I read the blockquoted material–it was fifty in total who signed the letter, not fourty-nine.
bob-neer says
Way to go.
<
p>
Here is a copy of her letter:
<
p>
mojoman says
to think of such a young person having the stones to hand that request to Bush. Maybe we’ll be able to salvage our democracy after all.
mcrd says
we wouldn’t have to worry about treating terrorists humanely.
sabutai says
Terrorists wouldn’t have such a success rate attacking Americans at home and abroad, and conning a president into acting under terror and deeply changing the American way of life.
<
p>
Bush isn’t fit to catch the ashes that fell from FDR’s cigarette.
eaboclipper says
but the Terrorist are not having a great success rate attacking the United States at home or abroad in any area in which we are not engaged and on offense. They just aren’t Please show me one attack on US interests where we were not engaged since 9/11.
<
p>
I’m waiting.
<
p>
9/11 was the culmination of planning that happened under the Clinton “no cruise missle left unfired” approach to thwarting terrorism.
raj says
I’m sure that your Republican collegues will applaud your efforts here, but your efforts are really quite unavailing.
<
p>
Let’s see.
<
p>
There was an attempted bombing of the WTC in 1993. Probably planned during the Bush I administration. Didn’t do much damage. The culprits were brought to justice during the Clinton administration. What did Bush I do? Apparently nothing.
<
p>
There was the bombings of the federal building in OKC. What happened? The perp was arrested and put to death.
<
p>
There were the bombings at the Atlanta Olympics and at other places by the Christianist Eric Frank Rudolph. The feds knew who he was, but he was protected by fellow Christianists.
<
p>
Then there was the bombing of the WTC in Sept 2001. The Clinton administration had notified the incoming Bush II administration of the possible danger. The Bush II malAdministration not only ignored the warnings, but they also ignored the warnings of the FBI.
<
p>
BTW, if you want to find the US State Department’s assessment of terrorism, do a simple Google search. The latest results are here. Some of us actually know how to do research over the Internet.
eaboclipper says
after 9/11 don’t you understand?
<
p>
Thank you.
raj says
9/11 was the culmination of planning that happened under the Clinton “no cruise missle left unfired” approach to thwarting terrorism
<
p>
…do you not understand?
<
p>
Some of us really do understand your intended implication.
<
p>
I’m sure that you will be looking through the US Dept of State terroism reports (one of which I linked to) to see what has been going on in the last few years. /sarcasm
amberpaw says
What so many need, and do not have is paid work. I am terribly worried that of the senior high school classes in Springfield – the graduation rate is under 10% and in Boston, under 30% – what will these young people DO?
raj says
If so, it’s relatively obscure.
<
p>
Which are you? The commenter who claimed to have 20 years in medical care? Or the commenter who claimed to be a recent retiree from the US Military? Or the commenter who obviously is a paid troll from the Republican party?
sabutai says
If the Republicans are paying this guy, he’s robbing them blind.
raj says
…maybe she should be invited to participate in whatever parade Wellesley has for July 4.
<
p>
I’d cheer her,
bob-neer says
She is a real patriot: a good example of what makes this country great.
eric-weltman says
I also admire Mari Oye’s courage.
<
p>
However, I cringed when I read the statement about her class representing “the best and brightest” of our nation.
<
p>
That phrase comes from the title of a book by David Halberstam, “The Best and the Brightest,” and refers to members of the Kennedy-Johnson administrations. It was meant to be ironic. The best and the brightest got us into Vietnam.
charley-on-the-mta says
only be used with that association? I recognize the Vietnam connection, but it still seems pretty generic to me.
amberpaw says
From now on, that phrase will mean the 50 who signed that letter and Mari Oye – as least to me.