All precincts reporting:
Tsongas 54,363 (51%)
Ogonowski 47,770 (45%)
Murphy 2,170 (2%)
Hayes 1,125 (1%)
Thompson 494 (0%)
UPDATE: Town-by-town results are here (thanks johnk).
Hold onto your hats. I'll update as I hear more. Tsongas is the winner. Congratulations to her and her hardworking campaign staff!
UPDATE: I'm hearing that WBZ has called it for Tsongas.
Further UPDATE by Charley: Lynne is telling me 53-47 will likely be the final result, once all precincts are in. Matt Murphy of the Lowell Sun says it's over. Niki declares victory.
Another UPDATE: Ogonowski's not conceding. Funny.
Please share widely!
congamondem says
demolisher says
is it available to the common man? đŸ™‚
david says
demolisher says
check out:
<
p>
http://www.theboston…
<
p>
refresh for updates seems to work
donatoa says
Tsongas 537
Oginowski 438
<
p>
Conservatives usually win here so this is a good sign.
eury13 says
They’re stuck at 6 precincts.
demolisher says
but David is still kicking their butt.
papicek says
eury13 says
but they aren’t showing as many precincts reported as David. I wonder if they have any we don’t yet or if they just aren’t caught up?
demolisher says
if they pulled up BMG for more current results while live on NECN… someone at the HQ probably has it
papicek says
papicek says
bob-neer says
stomv says
40.7k – 38.7k?
<
p>
That’s like 2.5%. That’s certainly not comfortable, but I don’t know if I’d call it really tight either…
demolisher says
Bostonchannel, running behind, still has ogo up 5%. I’d say its tight.
stomv says
It could still swing a little bit one way or the other… given different sizes and different voting rates.
<
p>
Of course, with 75% of precincts reporting, Ogo will have to win the rest by 7.5ish points to make up the difference…
frisco says
1) Has anyone confirmed the “call” by WBZ & what are their current returns showing?
2) How on Earth are you so far out in front of the posted numbers on TheBostonChannel.com?
david says
bob-neer says
You have to come here for real journalism!
bentheben says
Hold on to your hat indeed!
middkid says
As of 9:15 p.m., with 168 of 195 precincts – 86 percent, the results were:
<
p>
x-Nicola Tsongas, Dem 46,542 – 51 percent
<
p>
Jim Ogonowski, GOP 41,508 – 46 percent
<
p>
Patrick Murphy, Ind 1,428 – 2 percent
<
p>
Kurt Hayes, Ind 970 – 1 percent
<
p>
Kevin Thompson, CST 429 – 0 percent
papicek says
everyone else must be eating pizza
papicek says
sorry about that…I almost always preview first.
frisco says
johnt001 says
…is heading to Washington, DC. The override will still likely fail, but if I were the Democrats, I’d keep bringing the same bill back up for a vote every couple of weeks.
nomad943 says
A 5 point win over an underfinanced hay farmer in Massachusetts? And at a cost of how many millions? Sounds to me like the message didnt sell, and if it didnt sell here imagine how well it is selling across the rest of America. Cheers!
sabutai says
I hope the Republicans have lots of victories like this…
johnk says
masshole says
I’ll take the real one, thank you.
<
p>
Watch out…I think I hear all those illegal immigrants coming to overrun the 5th.
stomv says
Hide the youngsters’ health care!
bannedbythesentinel says
sore loserman.
With maybe some sour grapes on top?
đŸ˜‰
nomad943 says
I dont know of a single soul who gave a crap about NIKI or the 5th district seat. I couldnt even talk people into showing up to vote with the sox game coming up. This was a test baloon on the national stage and anything less than 10 percent win by the disciples was a big red flag for the stay the course dems. I would expect “our” candidates for prez to now be a bit more populist in their messages, maybe as soon as tommorow. Watch Hillary shift with the breeze. Its like a law of physics.
johnk says
bannedbythesentinel says
You cared enough to sign up (today of all days), and you cared enough to offer those bitter poo poo words at Tsongas' victory.
…just sayin'.
đŸ˜€
nomad943 says
But do you think I would feel any differently if the other as**hat was dancing on a stage. It didnt matter to me who won. We lost either way.
bannedbythesentinel says
nomad943 says
Nothing would change either way.
I had no interest in this race until it started popping up on CNN last week as being potentialy close. The spin on this from here will be awesome; we’re on the map again.
I actualy supported Jamie in the primaries, I mean he was the only one in the debates that could answer any of the questions without a soundbite, but Tsongas and Mr 9-11 was too steroetypical to get worked up about.
bannedbythesentinel says
nomad943 says
I sat down to watch the first debate and I said to myself the one the comes out here and says that NAFTA kills gets my vote … And only one of them got it.
bannedbythesentinel says
http://www.bluemassg…
charley-on-the-mta says
bannedbythesentinel says
It was nomad's first post.
How's this:
http://www.bluemassg…
nomad943 says
So whats your point?
bannedbythesentinel says
You've been a loyal democrat for 50 years and just decided today that Nikki was such a rotten candidate that it pushed you over the edge to become a republican.
I totally believe you. Why would I doubt your word?
Thanks for setting me straight. When I look at it that way there's nothing funny about that at all, is there?
shillelaghlaw says
I don’t know why you would lie, but you just created your account at 10am on election day. The statement that you voted for Eldridge in the primary but switched to Ogonowski for the final sounds kind of outlandish.
<
p>Frankly, you’re too new here to be taken at your word.
<
p>In most cases…
NEW MEMBER + OUTLANDISH STATEMENT = TROLL
nomad943 says
I am quite satisfied with my protest vote.
I just saw someone flash a Murphy the Bricklayer link … thats the issue, isnt it. The approved way to express disasatisfaction is to cast a token vote for a guy who gets at best a point or two and its business as usual?
Or help make a slam dunk really close and hope that in some think tank someplace someone taking note of public opinion mentions that JUST MAYBE its time to recognize actual peoples concerns.
Here is what I noticed alreasdy … did you catch NIKI’s congratulations to herself speach were she through out that line about “to the working people who are worried about losing their jobs, lets get to work”.
Well, isnt that a big jump over the “we can educate ourself out of job losses” theme she had hammered for all those previous months … I mean how many PHDs does it take to staff the new home depot? Wake up NIKI, wake up democrats … Why should I or any of us support you when you REFUSE to represent us outside of some occasional rhetoric and conselation on social issues that are realy not the business of government to begin with.
bannedbythesentinel says
who would most assuredly caucus and vote with the republican block.
You feel you would have been better represented that way? We just ended 12 years of republican domination of congress. You are clearly dissatisfied with your lot. How do you think it got that way? What makes you think that turning over your district to the republicans would be a departure from “business as usual”?
The “pox on both your houses” argument is the most flimsy excuse I've ever heard to want to restore republcan domination of our federal government.
Can't have Eldridge? Might as well vote Ogo? Hrugh?
nomad943 says
You must be really young to think that there are actualy two houses to put a pox on. Some people, myself included, view it as two FACTIONS of the same house …
Its a view you will come to some day yourself.
Here check out this short video I lifted off your be-loved DU. What do ya think?
<
p>
http://www.youtube.c…
bannedbythesentinel says
I've heard your argument often. It's the meme of people who are discouraged with the system in general and see no ongoing value in the electorial process. How does that justify casting a vote for Ogo?
nomad943 says
Because it DOES NOT MATTER how you vote … the system is rigged. Vote for OGO, vote for the bricklayer, write in your own name, only the faces will change, the story stays the same.
Why do you think noone votes in our great model of democracy? Most people get that point without any doubt in their minds. WE are the MINORITY that is actualy registered to vote and even here only about a quarter of the registered bothers to take 2 minutes to show up. Thats the actual public opinion, not which bill is ammended to this bill which is added to this mess to create a 600 pound document that noone gets to read but everyone feels the effects of.
bannedbythesentinel says
Historically and strategically, republicans benefit from low turnout. Your message is clear that your vote means nothing, yet not only did you go vote, you cast a “protest” vote for the republican.
That does not strike me as the action of someone who finds the system so broken that his vote does not matter.
nomad943 says
My father always hammered into my head that line about “if you dont vote then you dont have the right to complain” and since I plan on doing a lot of complaining I always make a point to vote. I suppose it’s as quaint of an old tradition as things like knowing what is written in the constitution but I like some tradition in my life from time to time. Besides, this time around I needed to get down there to pick up a party registration change form so I could get the D off my name and be able to vote for RON PAUL in the primary which at the rate they are moving the dates up might be tommorow or next week. I hope they are polite enough to let us know when it is ….
Ah well , I better do some work today or else maxwell’s silver hammer will come down upon my head …. catch ya later …
johnt001 says
<
p>
OR
<
p>
Either you had no interest in the race until last week, or you were paying attention during the primary – it can’t be both. Of course, there’s another option – that you’re lying when you post these comments…
nomad943 says
OGO VS NIKI
bob-neer says
Really!
papicek says
gentlemen, let the pundrity begin…. Let’s hear some spin.
<
p>
First, though: CONGRATS NIKI!!!!!!!! Do good work there, we’re counting on you.
mr-lynne says
… the most shocking news is that there are almost 500 voters crazy enough to send Thompson to congress to abolish the federal government.
bean-in-the-burbs says
I would have been quite ashamed of Massachusetts if a majority of voters in the 5th had fallen for Ogo’s rewarmed Republican hash.
amidthefallingsnow says
it’s considered a district with a relative lot of moron voters and a relative lack of political talent for the state. I’d say, all the evidence considered including on this thread, things went par for the course.
tonyb says
Wow – very scary that it was that close. How does a Bush-like Republican who claimes the biggest issue facing the 5th is illegal immigration make this a nail biter? Is 9/11 still that powerful? I think the Dems did a poor job of getting out the vote in a democratic district. Anyway, glad Nikki did it!
eury13 says
Easy – this was Tsongas’s race to lose, and she nearly lost it. Only in the last couple of weeks, when fate handed her SCHIP on a silver platter, did her message come together and did she make any appearance of an effort to connect with voters.
<
p>
EaBo was right – her campaign treated this like a coronation, not an election. I’m glad she won, but I hope that she learns something from this and makes some serious strategic changes next year.
<
p>
If Ogo hadn’t tanked himself over SCHIP, I wouldn’t have been surprised if he’d won.
trickle-up says
is pretty conservative.
frisco says
http://www.dailykos….
throbbingpatriot says
This was a special election in majority Democratic district held for years by Democratic Rep’s in an overwhelmingly Democratic state at a time when DC Republicans are indistinguishable from the Mafia.
<
p>
Ogonowski never had anything to offer beyond more Republican incompetence, bigotry, and backwardness.
<
p>
He was never in this race for a minute.
mrigney says
If that 86% of precincts means is a linear measure of total votes cast, the current numbers project out to a total of around 106,000 votes. That’s only about half of the total votes cast in MA-05 in the 2006 general election.
<
p>
In fact, there were 54,560 BLANKS cast against Marty Meehan – right now Ogonowski won’t get that many votes and Niki will only barely get over that mark.
frisco says
I would hardly expect the same sort of turnout here – it was the only question on most (all?) ballots district-wide.
mrigney says
I still don’t understand why. The 2006 general really only had a contested gubernatorial ballot in MA-05 – Meehan ran unopposed and most of the other statewide races were also unopposed, so the only thing to draw voters out was Governor’s race. The weather was perfect today and there was a clear choice – why did people come out in the fall last year, but not this year?
<
p>
It seems clear that Ogonowski failed to bring out a large chunk of the people who came out for Kerry Healey last year. Given that, I think any claims that he and his Republican handlers have found some sort of magic bullet for the races in 2008 ought to be taken with a large grain of salt. On the other side, Niki Tsongas is only going to get a small fraction of the votes that Marty Meehan garnered in the last election. That looks like a problem that she might want to address before next year’s primary. My quick take is that both candidates failed to inspire voters and that’s just never good.
eury13 says
Sounds like more stellar advice from the junior Keller.
frisco says
…in the 5th District?
laurel says
But David who can blame him, with only 195 or 195 polls reporting. oh…never mind
<
p>
well, but he didn’t lose by more than the margin that allows for a recount. oh…never mind….
frisco says
Paraphrasing: “Not until every vote is counted… Oh, nevermind.” – John Kerry, 2004?
<
p>
It now looks like a 51%-45% margin for Tsongas. Kinda tough to ask for a recount on that basis, eh, Mr. Ogo?
laurel says
when he was asked to give a concession speech, maybe he figured he had to stock up on the appropriate supplies first?
<
p>
tblade says
laurel says
nbeqco says
I really expected Tsongas to have a much better showing than she did. There is no excuse for Slobowski coming that close other than a poorly run campaign. I was fully expecting a nice 58-40-1-.5-.5 outcome. Needless to say, I think had Eldridge or any of the other lesser candidates won the primary, we would have a very ugly situation on our hands. It was interesting to see Murphy get more than 5 votes though. Aside for his “abiding concern for humanity” or whatever, he didn’t have much to say, but I would have at least wanted to vote for him had I been able to.
eury13 says
Of course there’s no way to know for sure, but Ogo’s appeal was his contrast with the supposedly aloof, elite, insider Tsongas. He was a man of the people, pounding the pavement while Niki sat in her ivory tower and spent gobs of special interest $$ on tv ads. (So the Republican message said, at least.)
<
p>
Any of the other candidates (and I exclude Miceli for obvious reasons) would have run a much stronger ground game. Sure, they would have had other weaknesses, but in the primary we saw that both Donoghue and Eldridge did a great job rallying their people and getting their message out (and they had good messages to begin with).
<
p>
We can’t know what the margin would have been with a different Dem nominee, but I feel confident that other primary candidates would have run significantly stronger general elections. The winner would have won the race, not barely avoided a loss.
dan-oc says
murphy actually had the most to say, and said it in great detail. he ran a really great campaign considering the obstacles.
mainefem says
It’s doable, huh?
<
p>
I’ve been watching Tsongas’s race.
<
p>
Am thrilled, suffice to say the least….