Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Sean Penn endorses Dennis Kucinich

December 10, 2007 By syarzhuk

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=…

If you are for a real progressive candidate, sign up to support Dennis Kucinich at http://www.december152007.com

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: 2008, dennis-kucinich, kucinich, sean-penn

Comments

  1. david says

    December 10, 2007 at 11:16 am

    • laurel says

      December 10, 2007 at 11:29 am

      look up!

      • joeltpatterson says

        December 10, 2007 at 3:17 pm

        offer any vivid metaphors, does he?

  2. raj says

    December 10, 2007 at 12:39 pm

    As I’ve written here before, Kucinich actually makes sense when he’s not in the 30-second sound-bite of these “debates.”  I’ve heard him on 3 hour talk show programs, and he could do a very good job of laying out proposals for problems, which made very good sense.

    <

    p>Dennis’s problem is that presidential campaigns in the USofA is that campaigns are defined by 30-second sound-bites, not by three hour talk-show programs.

  3. milo200 says

    December 10, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    I support Kucinich not because I love Dennis Kucinich, but because by supporting him I am saying that I am 100% anti-war, in favor of a non-profit health care system, and completely pro-LGBT.  It’s about the truths and issues he represents.

    <

    p>I will not be duped into believing the “hopeful” rhetoric of the campaign directors that worked for Deval and now work for Obama ever again.

    <

    p>Underneath all that inspiring “hope” is a whole lot of average plans on health, the environment, civil rights, you name it.

    <

    p>Look what Deval’s hope brought us. Corporate trips to China and Gambling to name a few things.

    <

    p>When the time comes that I have to choose who to vote for for president (not the primary) I will obviously choose the democrat not because I believe in the candidate but because voting for the lesser of the two evils will at least bring a little less suffering into the world.

    <

    p>It is unfortunate that democrats and progressives will not untie behind certain principles like a universal non-profit health care system.

    <

    p>I am sick of the extreme incrementalism advocated by so many “progressives” and presidential candidates today. I believe that if all the health care advocates would get on board with one strong powerful message for such a policy we could make some real headway. Instead we remain fragmented, each accepting little pieces of what we want here and there – a little at a time. It prolongs the fight for eternity.

    • syarzhuk says

      December 10, 2007 at 5:17 pm

      Isn’t it ironic that one of leading 2008 democratic candidates’ medical plan is worse than the 1974 plan introduced by a corrupt Republican (Nixon)?

      <

      p>Kucinich is a breathe of fresh air. He has no chance, but I still support him.

      • centralmassdad says

        December 10, 2007 at 5:30 pm

        may be the liberal-est liberals on this site, and that is saying something.

        • syarzhuk says

          December 10, 2007 at 8:54 pm

          Too many people on this site equate liberalism with democratic party. I am a proud unenrolled voter; Dems are just marginally better. The whole two-party system is corrupt and wrong.

          • centralmassdad says

            December 11, 2007 at 9:09 am

            that you and milo are pretty far to the left.

  4. eddiecoyle says

    December 10, 2007 at 6:42 pm

    Sean Penn’s endorsement of Kucinich reminds me of the apt philosphical riddle, “if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” In the case of the Penn endorsement of Kucinich, I am afraid the answer is a resounding NO.

    • laurel says

      December 10, 2007 at 6:44 pm

      shouldn’t that be a nigh on silent NO? đŸ˜‰

      • eddiecoyle says

        December 10, 2007 at 10:32 pm

        Absoultely, a silent and unheard NO! Thanks for helping me keep my analogies straight.

  5. farnkoff says

    December 11, 2007 at 9:46 am

    if it wasn’t for the fact that we’re still in Iraq, and Bush and Cheney have not even been impeached. The headlines keep coming “Dems want answers”. “Dems investigating…” but nothing changes. The raw sewage keeps flowing out of the white house into the halls of Congress, eventually seeping into the nation’s water supply.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.