Over two weeks ago, we saw the people of Iowa proclaim that our time for change has come. But there were those who doubted this country’s desire for something new – who said Iowa was a fluke not to be repeated again.
Well, tonight, the cynics who believed that what began in the snows of Iowa was just an illusion were told a different story by the good people of South Carolina.
After four great contests in every corner of this country, we have the most votes, the most delegates, and the most diverse coalition of Americans we’ve seen in a long, long time.
They are young and old; rich and poor. They are black and white; Latino and Asian. They are Democrats from Des Moines and Independents from Concord; Republicans from rural Nevada and young people across this country who’ve never had a reason to participate until now. And in nine days, nearly half the nation will have the chance to join us in saying that we are tired of business-as-usual in Washington, we are hungry for change, and we are ready to believe again.
But if there’s anything we’ve been reminded of since Iowa, it’s that the kind of change we seek will not come easy. Partly because we have fine candidates in the field – fierce competitors, worthy of respect. And as contentious as this campaign may get, we have to remember that this is a contest for the Democratic nomination, and that all of us share an abiding desire to end the disastrous policies of the current administration.
But there are real differences between the candidates. We are looking for more than just a change of party in the White House. We’re looking to fundamentally change the status quo in Washington – a status quo that extends beyond any particular party. And right now, that status quo is fighting back with everything it’s got; with the same old tactics that divide and distract us from solving the problems people face, whether those problems are health care they can’t afford or a mortgage they cannot pay.
So this will not be easy. Make no mistake about what we’re up against.
We are up against the belief that it’s ok for lobbyists to dominate our government – that they are just part of the system in Washington. But we know that the undue influence of lobbyists is part of the problem, and this election is our chance to say that we’re not going to let them stand in our way anymore.
We are up against the conventional thinking that says your ability to lead as President comes from longevity in Washington or proximity to the White House. But we know that real leadership is about candor, and judgment, and the ability to rally Americans from all walks of life around a common purpose – a higher purpose.
We are up against decades of bitter partisanship that cause politicians to demonize their opponents instead of coming together to make college affordable or energy cleaner; it’s the kind of partisanship where you’re not even allowed to say that a Republican had an idea – even if it’s one you never agreed with. That kind of politics is bad for our party, it’s bad for our country, and this is our chance to end it once and for all.
We are up against the idea that it’s acceptable to say anything and do anything to win an election. We know that this is exactly what’s wrong with our politics; this is why people don’t believe what their leaders say anymore; this is why they tune out. And this election is our chance to give the American people a reason to believe again.
And what we’ve seen in these last weeks is that we’re also up against forces that are not the fault of any one campaign, but feed the habits that prevent us from being who we want to be as a nation. It’s the politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon. A politics that tells us that we have to think, act, and even vote within the confines of the categories that supposedly define us. The assumption that young people are apathetic. The assumption that Republicans won’t cross over. The assumption that the wealthy care nothing for the poor, and that the poor don’t vote. The assumption that African-Americans can’t support the white candidate; whites can’t support the African-American candidate; blacks and Latinos can’t come together.
But we are here tonight to say that this is not the America we believe in. I did not travel around this state over the last year and see a white South Carolina or a black South Carolina. I saw South Carolina. I saw crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children. I saw shuttered mills and homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from all walks of life, and men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. I saw what America is, and I believe in what this country can be.
That is the country I see. That is the country you see. But now it is up to us to help the entire nation embrace this vision. Because in the end, we are not just up against the ingrained and destructive habits of Washington, we are also struggling against our own doubts, our own fears, and our own cynicism. The change we seek has always required great struggle and sacrifice. And so this is a battle in our own hearts and minds about what kind of country we want and how hard we’re willing to work for it.
So let me remind you tonight that change will not be easy. That change will take time. There will be setbacks, and false starts, and sometimes we will make mistakes. But as hard as it may seem, we cannot lose hope. Because there are people all across this country who are counting us; who can’t afford another four years without health care or good schools or decent wages because our leaders couldn’t come together and get it done.
Theirs are the stories and voices we carry on from South Carolina.
The mother who can’t get Medicaid to cover all the needs of her sick child – she needs us to pass a health care plan that cuts costs and makes health care available and affordable for every single American.
The teacher who works another shift at Dunkin Donuts after school just to make ends meet – she needs us to reform our education system so that she gets better pay, and more support, and her students get the resources they need to achieve their dreams.
The Maytag worker who is now competing with his own teenager for a $7-an-hour job at Wal-Mart because the factory he gave his life to shut its doors – he needs us to stop giving tax breaks to companies that ship our jobs overseas and start putting them in the pockets of working Americans who deserve it. And struggling homeowners. And seniors who should retire with dignity and respect.
The woman who told me that she hasn’t been able to breathe since the day her nephew left for Iraq, or the soldier who doesn’t know his child because he’s on his third or fourth tour of duty – they need us to come together and put an end to a war that should’ve never been authorized and never been waged.
The choice in this election is not between regions or religions or genders. It’s not about rich versus poor; young versus old; and it is not about black versus white.
It’s about the past versus the future.
It’s about whether we settle for the same divisions and distractions and drama that passes for politics today, or whether we reach for a politics of common sense, and innovation – a shared sacrifice and shared prosperity.
There are those who will continue to tell us we cannot do this. That we cannot have what we long for. That we are peddling false hopes.
But here’s what I know. I know that when people say we can’t overcome all the big money and influence in Washington, I think of the elderly woman who sent me a contribution the other day – an envelope that had a money order for $3.01 along with a verse of scripture tucked inside. So don’t tell us change isn’t possible.
When I hear the cynical talk that blacks and whites and Latinos can’t join together and work together, I’m reminded of the Latino brothers and sisters I organized with, and stood with, and fought with side by side for jobs and justice on
the streets of Chicago. So don’t tell us change can’t happen.When I hear that we’ll never overcome the racial divide in our politics, I think about that Republican woman who used to work for Strom Thurmond, who’s now devoted to educating inner-city children and who went out onto the streets of South Carolina and knocked on doors for this campaign. Don’t tell me we can’t change.
Yes we can change.
Yes we can heal this nation.
Yes we can seize our future.
And as we leave this state with a new wind at our backs, and take this journey across the country we love with the message we’ve carried from the plains of Iowa to the hills of New Hampshire; from the Nevada desert to the South Carolina coast; the same message we had when we were up and when we were down – that out of many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope; and where we are met with cynicism, and doubt, and those who tell us that we can’t, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people in three simple words:
Yes. We. Can.
Obama: Race Now Is About New Versus Old
Please share widely!
And if Obama thinks that by hitting on those populist notes he’s going to sway some Edwards supporters, well he’s right.
<
p>Let’s see if he can keep it going.
Yet even better delivery.
<
p>By contrast, when Hillary came on, she looked pretty tired, strained. Totally understandable, I suppose.*
<
p>Also, the crowd they assembled to be her backgrop her mostly just sat there: dead.
<
p>The pictures just amplified Obama’s message.
<
p>*I know each candidate has finest political minds money can buy. But out here in commonsense world…..even if you can scramble to get, say, 10,000 more votes during election day by scrambling from stop to stop, isn’t it a better plan to give up those votes for enough sleep to look “presidential” when you’re going to be solo on cable TV that night for a 10 to 15 minute speech? Especially HRC and McCain? Can someone shed some light on the tradeoff?
dob 8/4/61.
Fixed in main post.
Oh, for the love of political correctness! Now it's not just a race or gender circus, it's about young new and old? Very thinly veiled ageism showing. I for one, respect the elder generation while thrilled to see younger voters engaging.
……build casinos and raise taxes! woo!
Progress with the Republicans in the rear-view mirror in Massachusetts. It would be even better nationwide.
<
p>Personally, I think one casino would be just fine, but much better than three. As to the taxes, that’s not entirely clear yet: let’s see what comes out in the wash. At least we’re not getting hit with $500 million in new fees ala Romney.
to protect marriage besides spit out sound bites.
<
p>I can’t believe you guys are going to let him take an ounce or credit for all your hard work.
Plus, the dogs of the Commonwealth are breathing easier now that the, “roof box,” man has gone away.
<
p>But, look, why don’t you write a 3,000 word essay for the readers of Red Mass Group breaking down how Romney spent his $500 million tax increase and then cross-post it here, and we can continue this discussion.
<
p>Really, I’d like to know what he did with the money because he certainly didn’t spend it supervising the Big Dig.
Have you ever seen me say one good thing about Multiple Choice Mitt?
<
p>You start calling people Yankee Fans in Southie and fists fly.
I was teasing you.
<
p>Here have a beer, and have an excellent Sunday.
<
p>
<
p>2. He won the corner office as a pro-marriage candidate.
<
p>3. He’s made it very clear that he supports the legislators who voted pro-marriage.
<
p>
<
p>Each of those things is significant, and they were all things that folks over at MassEquality et al couldn’t have done with all the effort in the world. Could DP have secured marriage rights without the efforts of MassEquality? I doubt it. Could MassEquality have done it without DP? Probably. But, we did it. Everyone working with MassEquality. Everyone working to support Deval Patrick. Everyone who worked in a primary or general election supporting a legislator who promised to support marriage. Everyone who talked about the issue, encouraging their friends and neighbors to join the pro- side. In defending marriage rights for all, together we did do it.
i think joe and others forget how huge it was – and still is – to campaign on a pro-equality platform. that was not a minor gesture that went unnoticed by all but the queers. witness the current dem potus candidates and their firm but expedient stance against equality.
If I’m not mistaken, pro-equality candidates have unseated anti-equality candidates some 4 or 5 times in this state over the last 4 years. Seems to me that from a strictly political perspective, it’s the winning side…
From the CommonWealth mag article:
<
p>
<
p>And, as others have noted in this thread, the fact that he campaigned aggressively as a pro-marriage candidate made a huge difference.
<
p>I know, you don’t like the guy, you wish Kerry Healey had won, blah blah. Sorry, but she lost. Don’t imitate your silly Republican cohorts in their steadfast refusal to acknowledge Patrick’s (or any Democrat’s) success in anything. It makes you look petty.
You guys fought the good fight and won. You took this fight to the courts, you won, and you took it to the lege, and you won. And then you want to give this guy who, yes, campaigned for marriage equality, all of this credit where I think he shouldn’t get it. You guys are the people who deserve the credit. I have serious doubts Deval Patrick dropped hundreds of thousands of man hours into this cause. Ok, sure, he had an impact, but nothing so far as masterful.
<
p>But jeez, don’t turn him into the person of the year for marriage equality when he’s obviously more worried about his own personal power and status than he is about any of your problems. Him and Mitt are the same kind of person, using this state as a springboard to something else. You can quote me on that later.
no one but you.
That was a thumpin. So much for the appeal of the “first black president”. The Clintons will spin this one as a black man doing well in a black state…But c’mon, this was a state Obama was losing until about December and to win it this big – against both the Clintons on the trail – to actually win a primary with a majority of votes and not just a plurality should be noted. More delegates, more diversity, more momentum going into FEB 5. MO BAMA!
Candidate. Deval Patrick, had very inspirational speeches and promises.
<
p>Governor Deval Patrick is having a hard time converting them to effective governance and actions.
<
p>Do not blame the legislature, effective leaders learn to overcome roadblocks to move the agenda forward.
<
p>Candidate Obama is making similar very eloquent speeches and promises also.
<
p>Before I drink the Kool Aid I would like to ask candidate Obama who he envisions as Sec of State, Defense and the the Federal Reserve and other key positions.
<
p>The US Presidency is not a place for on the job training.
<
p>Ask Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton or George W.
<
p>Yes, We.Can….what?
No one running in this race has ever been president or even vice-president before, so whoever wins is going to have get “on-the-job training”, so I don’t understand your point at all.
<
p>It would obviously be interesting to know who the candidates would choose for various cabinet positions, but no candidate ever does that, so there is not much point in asking.
<
p>
I have not seen this assertion(Obama won all groups except over 65) posted anywhere else ie TPM or KOS. Interesting angle, would love to see it get more air time.