Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

Bristol Palin….Raped?

By

Does anyone know Bristol Palin’s birthday?

She is 5 to 6 months pregnant. The age of consent in Alaska is 17 [ 4 if you are a bear or a moose ]. If Bristol Palin had sex with her boyfriend and got pregnant BEFORE she turned 17 Bristol Palin could not have given her consent. Therefore, it would be rape of a minor Bristol Palin.

Would think that the law and order conservative Republicrats would under normal circumstances be calling for the arrest and conviction of Bristol Palin’s attacker for rape of a minor not praising the rapist for conservative family values.

What a bunch of hypocrites !

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0

Comments

  1. through the Alaska statutes (see also the statutes following that one) suggests that, in most cases, the age of consent in Alaska is 16.  So I don’t see an issue here, unless you’ve got some law saying otherwise.

    • They may also have a “Romeo and Juliet” law although I’m not sure.  As there is 1 year difference between the father and mother.

    • I’m a lot more interested that it came out today that Sarah Palin and her husband couldn’t even run a business to the point where it ended up getting shut down by the state.  Town politics, state politics, private business…poor woman’s got the leaden touch.

        • How silly of me to expect you to use Google on your own…

          <

          p>Here.

          <

          p>I’m sure you’ll claim that since Palin was only part owner, she’s not responsible for what happened to her own investments.  After all, why should our vice president know anything about how multitasking, oversight, delegation, or wise decision making?

          • links when I talk about a story.  Now it was a learned response from raj beating me silly, but I’ve learned.

            <

            p>That reminds me, anybody know what happened to raj?  Did he pass away?

          • They were 20% investors in a car wash.  They weren’t the executives in charge, they provided money.  So oh my god they lost money in an investment.  NOBODY has done that before.  Is that all you got?  

            • I’d say we’re 20% investors of Iraq, which is pissing away our money while building a surplus…so you’re cool with this level of diligence?

            • They weren’t 20% investors – they each held a 20% stake. They didn’t lose money in an investment – the company was “involuntarily dissolved” by the state for failing to report properly and non-payment of licensing fees, even after multiple warnings.

              <

              p>Let’s see, the Palins threw a bunch of money to an acquaintance who didn’t feel like following the laws and then didn’t pay any attention to what happened to the cash. When it all went wrong, she tried cover it up.  I can see why she’s so popular with the Republicans.

            • Not when what is written doesn’t help you make your case, I guess.

              Palin and husband Todd each held a 20 percent stake in Anchorage Car Wash LLC, according to state corporation records filed in 2004.

              A review of Palin’s gubernatorial disclosure filings indicates that she failed to report her stake in the company on the form that requires candidates for governor to disclose any interest in a nonpublicly traded company.

              The car wash venture was not entirely smooth sailing. State records show the business ran into trouble with Alaska’s division of corporations business and professional licensing after Palin became governor of the state in 2006.

              A Feb. 11, 2007 letter to the governor’s business partner advises that the car wash had “not filed its biennial report and/or paid its biennial fees,” which were more than a year overdue.

              The warning letter was written on state letterhead, which carried Palin’s name at the top, next to the state seal.

              On April 3, 2007, the state went further and issued a “certificate of involuntary dissolution” because of the car wash’s failure to file its report and pay state licensing fees.

              Palin’s gubernatorial disclosure filings also reveal her involvement in another failed startup — a marketing business which was to go by the name Rouge Cou, which evidently is a literal French translation of “red neck.” On the 2005 form, Palin describes the firm as one for which she secured a license but did not conduct any business.

              <

              p>Reformer?  Sounds like common scoundrel to me.  Say EaBo, are you behind the reelection of Senator Wilkerson, too, or do you think she’d also make a great VP?

          • From the WashingtonPost piece:

            <

            p>

            Palin’s gubernatorial disclosure filings also reveal her involvement in another failed startup — a marketing business which was to go by the name Rouge Cou, which evidently is a literal French translation of “red neck.” On the 2005 form, Palin describes the firm as one for which she secured a license but did not conduct any business.

            <

            p>Good Lord.

Archives