Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Hope you didn’t give up on Alaska

November 12, 2008 By sabutai

Sarah Palin’s home state is moving closer to electing a Democratic Senator (from the source):

Begich, Mark DEM 125019 47.24%

Bird, Bob AI 10913 4.12%

Gianoutsos, Ted NA 1076 0.41%

Haase, Fredrick D. LIB 1961 0.74%

Stevens, Ted REP 125016 47.24%

Write-in Votes 670 0.25%

Convicted Felon Stevens had a notable lead on election night,. but the absentee and early votes are breaking hard for the non-criminal in the race.  That, plus a likely Franken victory, gets us to 58 + Lieberman.  C’mon in Judd Gregg, the blue water’s fine…

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. pablo says

    November 12, 2008 at 10:28 pm

    … we don’t know?

    <

    p>sabutai wrote:

    C’mon in Judd Gregg, the blue water’s fine…

    • sabutai says

      November 12, 2008 at 10:32 pm

      All’s I know is that Judd Gregg has two choices in 2010: win as a Democrat, or lose.  If he wants option 2, I’m okay with that as well.  I think Paul Hodes would make a fine Senator.

      <

      p>But if we get to 59, I want to know if Reid has any tricks up his sleeve.

      • fieldscornerguy says

        November 12, 2008 at 11:14 pm

        Does Judd Gregg have hidden progressivism in his record?  I thought of him as pretty solidly Republican, but I guess I haven’t examined his record.  Or were you just opening the option in case he wanted to have a conversion experience?

        • christopher says

          November 13, 2008 at 9:03 am

          I know that given the last two cycles in NH if I were Judd Gregg I’d be pretty nervous.  If he does have a hidden progressive streak now would be a good time to start showing it.

        • tblade says

          November 13, 2008 at 12:24 pm

          But one doesn’t have to be overly progressive to be a Democrat. In other words, while most progressives tend to be Democrats, not all Dems are progressive. I’m not advocating for Gregg, just saying that being a New England Republican would, at a cursory glance, make it plausible that Gregg could fit in is a centrist Dem. Looking at Wikipedia, it seems he’s decent on the Environment, voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment and bucked his party on stem cells. He seems to be a moderate on gun control, but wiki also says he’s “solidly pro-life”.

          <

          p>Could Lincoln Chaffee won re-election in RI if he jumped parties two years before his race? I don’t know. Ask Sununu if he’d rather be the Democratic Senator from NH who flipped sides or the Republican who recently lost his job?  

          <

          p>I’d probably rather see Gregg replaced with a progressive Dem in 2010. But if I were Gregg, I’d look at fellow New Englanders Sununu, Shays, Chaffee and Jeb Bradley and look long and hard into his soul. Perhaps he’s made his peace and won’t be too upset if he looses re-election in two years, but if he wants to improve his chances of keeping his job, especially in light of national trends and the new Democratic grass roots momentum, he needs to shed any appearance of Bush-era Republicanism. Leaving the GOP would be an effective way of doing so.  

          • centralmassdad says

            November 13, 2008 at 4:22 pm

            before Gregg is up for reelection, which is a pretty big assumption.

          • fieldscornerguy says

            November 13, 2008 at 5:09 pm

            There’s a big difference between Chris Shays or Lincoln Chafee, on the one hand, and John Sununu on the other.  If the former had switched parties, it would have been believable, and they might indeed have passed as conservative Dems.  But a conservative like Sununu trying to suddenly change parties?  Unless he had a pretty compelling reason, I think that most voters would see it as a craven move to save his political neck.  Unless, perhaps, he had a compelling story about seeing a vision of FDR on the road to Manchester.

            <

            p>I’m not sure where Judd Gregg falls on that spectrum, but I think that random Republican office-holders claiming to be Dems in order to save their skins would not necessarily be a good thing.  Current Dems, especially progressive ones, would do well to ask why if anyone switches.

        • charley-on-the-mta says

          November 15, 2008 at 8:03 pm

          Jumping in rather late here …

          <

          p>Judd Gregg is a “hard core conservative.” No, he will not change parties, and if he does, we shouldn’t take him.

  2. david says

    November 12, 2008 at 10:42 pm

    • sabutai says

      November 13, 2008 at 7:29 am

      There’s another 30,000 votes or so to count, and they look to be favorable for Begich.  His margin is going to be much higher than in Minnesota.  However, if Stevens wants to divert some of his legal fund for the purpose, he’s welcome to do so.

  3. demredsox says

    November 13, 2008 at 7:33 am

    http://www.elect.alaska.net/da…

  4. johnt001 says

    November 13, 2008 at 7:44 am

    …is an effectively filibuster-proof majority.  Enough Republicans can be pealed away from filibusters – Olympia Snowe in Maine, the afore-mentioned Judd Gregg, Chuck Grassley in Iowa, and others – none of these folks want to face their voters while ads run saying that they opposed President Obama’s agenda to the point of filibustering it.

    <

    p>Look for Democrats to expand their majority to 65-67 seats in 2010…

    • fieldscornerguy says

      November 13, 2008 at 5:12 pm

      Look for Democrats to expand their majority to 65-67 seats in 2010…

      <

      p>Have you looked at the map for that election?  The Republicans up for re-election are mostly in very red states, or they’re folks like Arlen Specter who are muched loved by their constituents.  Even with a wave of retirements, i see a few pickups as a likely best-case scenario.

      <

      p>Of course, making such prognostications now, before Obama has even taken office and before some races are even determined, is a recipe for being very wrong.

      • johnt001 says

        December 1, 2008 at 8:58 am

        http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…

    • ryepower12 says

      November 14, 2008 at 1:02 am

      had to censor myself there =p

      <

      p>no way Reid holds those cats together.

      <

      p>60 is a magical, mythical number for the Democrats. It’ll be much easier to get bills passed with these numbers, but it’s going to be extremely tough to get good bills through the senate still because of conservative DINOs.

  5. tom-m says

    November 13, 2008 at 11:11 am

    Why is this taking so long?  It’s been 9 days- is that unusual?  I know it’s a big state and all, but if most of our cities and towns can get it done by 10pm of election night, what is the hangup in AK?  Even Minnesota was done with their initial count a week ago.

    <

    p>Seems to me, the longer it takes, the more doubt it sows in people’s minds.  

    • marcus-graly says

      November 13, 2008 at 12:02 pm

      While in Massachusetts they need to arrive by election day, so most of the 9 days was waiting for all the absentees to trickle in.

      <

      p>Massachusetts does allow for oversees military to send in their absentees up to 10 days after the election, so if we had a really close race, we could theoretically be waiting 10 days here too.

  6. sabutai says

    November 15, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    Even Stevens’ pollster admits that it’s game over.  Begich’s lead keeps growing, and will as ballots are counted.  Ideally, we’d get beyond a .5% lead so that Stevens would have to pay for the recount, but either way it looks really good.  He currently has a lead of over 1,000 votes, and ballots that need to be counted are from areas that lean his direction.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.