This pick will make some of our resident commentators happy: Bennett has bought wholesale into the scores=performance, “merit pay”, and union busting approaches to education favored by several folks on this site.
Bennett oversaw the implementation of “ProComp”, a parallel compensation option for teachers in Denver. About 2/3 of teachers chose to join the system, which includes a provision for the principal to give a whopping bonus to his/her favorite teacher. Many teachers have problems with the system, and a teachers’ strike in Denver was a real possibility this summer. Bennett’s official biography uses the terms “test scores” and “student achievement” interchangeably. He has held the post for only three years (and will apparently break a promise to stay for at least 5).
This is a politically curious choice. Bennett is relatively unknown outside of Colorado (though he was a rumored Cabinet possibility for Obama), but he does not have the heft of many other Democrats in Colorado who were seeking the appointment. Blog chatter seems to mark Bennett as rather moderate, and notably ambitious. Bennett forked over the campaign maximums to Obama, and while he apparently would run in 2010 to keep the seat, he would face challenges from a long list of Democrats, led by uber-popular Denver mayor John Hickenlooper.
goldsteingonewild says
did a story last year on him and a struggling denver high school, good reading.
<
p>Hey, maybe he just needs a briefing paper on assessment alternatives….
pablo says
The guy has been in the trenches. He has the guts to try something new, and the confidence to change course when things may not be going as expected. He has a passion for his work, and he was out there ringing doorbells of at-risk kids.
<
p>I like his style. I don’t know his views on the issues of the day, but he seems like a good choice.
christopher says
Much of what you say he has done is at least worth considering, and if 2/3 of teachers chose to join his program it can’t be all that bad for teachers.
hoyapaul says
I still don’t know much about Bennett, but from what I’ve seen it’s pretty good. He seems like someone who is willing to try out and implement new ideas.
<
p>While I don’t yet know whether Bennett is a good choice, I would note that sabutai’s summary here seems quite slanted against him, and I’m not sure why. The ProComp system seems to have been pretty popular with teachers, and the unions have agreed to the idea. A bit more of the story is described by this article by the Center for American Progress. For what it’s worth, it seems CAP (a liberal think-tank) approves of the idea, so it doesn’t seem like it’s the sort of right-wing “union-busting” program that sabutai makes it out to be in the post. It appears to be a pretty good idea in a policy area that is in dire need of innovation…especially where all the major players (cities, administration, unions, teachers) are on board.
sabutai says
…95% (at least) of what Bennett will be dealing with has nothing to do with his background as an urban superintendent. My main concern isn’t about Bennett’s inability to tell the difference between test scores and student achievement, but rather his political plans. If he’s content to be a 2-year caretaker, that’s what I’d love to see. However, given his record for ambition, I worry about a Democratic primary featuring a largely anonymous urban mandarin whose only hope of election is exploiting his unearned incumbency.
joeltpatterson says
…snip…
via David Sirota.
<
p>And from Open Secrets, there’s this info about the Anschutz Corporation of Colorado: $28,000 to the NRSC in March 2008, plus thousands more to Elizabeth Dole.
<
p>It’s fair ask questions as to whether this Bennet guy will vote with empathy toward the ordinary people or with sympathy for the billionaires.
sabutai says
David Sirota:
<
p>
<
p>A whole bunch of Colorado Democrats.
<
p>A teacher in his district