23% more of your health insurance dollars would be spent on health services instead of overhead.
tbladesays
neilsagansays
that would require 90% of health insurance premiums to be spent on health services limiting profit and overhead to 10% for all plans subsidized by the federal government. this still would have left $69 billion in profit and overhead for health insurance companies in a bill that mandates every American buy insurance. It was defeated.
<
p>I don’t see how the Federal government thinks it can have an individual mandate without an inclusive public option that is 20-25% more efficient converting premiums into health services.
kathysays
He’s been deviating from the talking points more often these days.
Has any other news channels asked these hard questions? It’s frustrating to see them mostly just listening to both sides as if they were equally credible.
23% more of your health insurance dollars would be spent on health services instead of overhead.
that would require 90% of health insurance premiums to be spent on health services limiting profit and overhead to 10% for all plans subsidized by the federal government. this still would have left $69 billion in profit and overhead for health insurance companies in a bill that mandates every American buy insurance. It was defeated.
<
p>I don’t see how the Federal government thinks it can have an individual mandate without an inclusive public option that is 20-25% more efficient converting premiums into health services.
He’s been deviating from the talking points more often these days.
Has any other news channels asked these hard questions? It’s frustrating to see them mostly just listening to both sides as if they were equally credible.