Capuano arrives at this juncture after two distinct and impressive stints in public office.
First, as a five-term mayor of Somerville, Capuano transformed what had been a city in decline: he rooted out corruption, improved the schools, developed parkland, and invested in neighborhoods.
In his 11 years as a US congressman, Capuano has been a stalwart voice for liberal values, including a woman’s right to choose and opposition to the death penalty. More important, he has stood firm for principles when others did not – notably, by voting against the Iraq War authorization and against the liberty-infringing PATRIOT Act….
Capuano also has continued to aid his home district, through constituent services, earmarks for local industries, and by securing important funds for state transportation projects.
This is the way Kennedy represented Massachusetts. It worked.
But, while Capuano may be following the Kennedy playbook, he has his own style. His priorities and outrage at injustice – which some have criticized as anger, but we see as passion – come from his working-class Somerville upbringing. The Senate will be well-served by those qualities.
Interesting breakdowns in recent endorsements: Capuano gets the Herald and the Phoenix; Khazei gets the Globe, the T&G, and BMG. Strange bedfellows all around!
Khazei gets the Globe, the T&G, and BMG {EDITORS}.
Just like the other media, the BMG endorsement reflects the opinions of its editorial board. I doubt the newspapers polled their correspondents either.
I throw out some throughts here.
The majority of the opinion posted on BMG is posted by the bloggers not the editors. To call it a BMG endorsement, as opposed to a BMG EDITOR endorsement, is to imply there is some concensus amoung the “members” of the 4000 member community. If anything there is a concencus around a different candidate. So that what I’m saying. The endorsemnet should be labeled unambigously out of respect for the 4000 member community.
Do you stop complaining/sounding cranky all the time when this race is over?
It’s a simple point ‘BMG EDITORS’ endorsment.
Maybe a few hundred regular posters, and three editors.
<
p>The vast majority of people who visit BMG just give it a quick scan and leave. They never post or comment.
<
p>Who is the community?
is the people post frequently?
That people who post are more invested in the community but not any more a member of the community than the people who visit regularly or even infrequently.
but the endorsment implies it’s 4000 (or whatever) strong.
Anyone who doesn’t know how the endorsement worked on this site doesn’t care about it anyway. Come on, stop pretending otherwise.
<
p>that Bobasked. There is one. It’s large. Stop pretending ther isn’t.
<
p>I pose a simple question, why not call it the BMG EDITORS’ endorsement out of consideration for the roughly 75% of members who endorse another candidate? (If not 75% then atleast > 50.)
an account called the contributors?
who is to say we cant poll among the people who post and comment frequently?
No one is confused about what the Blue Mass Group endorsement means.
…I didn’t make the comparison to newspapers polling readers. I deliberately used the correspondents analogy because as contributers we are like correspondents/op-ed columnists. The lurkers without accounts are analogous to newspaper readers.
The Herald endorsed Capuano but The Phoenix not so much. I was shocked the Globe endorse Khazei but it never even crossed my mind to think about who the T&G would endorse. The BMG endorsement comes from three people, and as such should always be written the BMG EDITOR’s endorsement.
But whats a T&G?
It’s the Worcester daily newspaper. Formerly the Worcester Telegram and the Worcester Gazette, affactionately known as T&G.
;-P
nice job. But they got it right!
<
p>But Coakley did not get a single endorsement from on major newspaper or blog and is the frontrunner. That’s interesting.
She got an endorsement from the largest newspaper….in Rhode Island.
<
p>http://www.projo.com/opinion/e…
<
p>And it’s not even a good endorsement:
<
p>
<
p>huh?
other than no one.
From WBUR
<
p>
<
p>Enough said on the matter.
New York Times.
<
p>Plullleze, those endorsements were phoned in.
http://www.wickedlocal.com/new…