The Cosmo page was shown with huge black square over the middle part of Brown’s body (hilarious).
Blitzer’s asserts that if it had been a woman, it would have been harmful to her campaign.
Gergen agrees that such a photo shoot would be a burden to a woman’s campaign. But not so for Scott Brown. He states Brown’s nude photo shoot has not harmed his campaign, it has only created a buzz about him.
Unbelievable.
Please share widely!
Do you want him disqualified from winning because of this, or would you like women in the future to have a similar immunity from political destruction because a picture of her breasts are floating around the internet?
<
p>I think the former would be better for democrats, the latter better for women.
He said Levi Johnston had engaged in pornography.
So therefore Scott Brown has engaged in producing pornography.
Does Scott Brown think producing pornography is acceptable?
<
p>I would bet he doesn’t (or at least he won’t admit he does).
<
p>Therefore, hypocrite.
<
p>Therefore should he lose over this issue (which frankly I do not think will be the cause of his loss) it won’t be unfair to him.
Whatever the case may be. I think displaying ones nude body in public is a stupid thing to do. However, there are many who would think otherwise. So, in the interest of being a person who lives and let’s live, I don’t care if it’s considered acceptable or not acceptable, I just want it to be consistent for men and women.
<
p>The fact that there is no outrage and media discussion about his public nudity, yet there were many days of media coverage over Hillary Clinton’s clothing snafu (not) at a speech one day, is proof positive that we live in a sexist media environment that continues to carry the sexism torch forward.