The full 17-page Google Doc from the civil rights groups is here. Read it and you’ll see that it is more than just criticism of RTTT, it offers good ideas that are fairer to all the children of America, not just in the states that Arne Duncan approves of.
Please share widely!
lisag says
The civil rights statement is significant. And its message is bolstered by another group that is speaking out this week, a coalition of 24 national community-based organizations, Communities for Excellent Public Schools.
<
p>According to Valerie Strauss in the Washington Post, this group “criticizes the administration for taking ‘top-down school improvement efforts’ that are part of No Child Left Behind and thinking that they will somehow be successful by ‘adding teeth.’ It says that they ignore a growing body of research about what does work.”
<
p>I say Amen to both groups for speaking out at this critical moment.
<
p>Lisa Guisbond
Citizens for Public Schools
http://www.citizensforpublicsc…
<
p>
lisag says
I couldn’t find a link to the document yesterday, but it’s up now here.
<
p>Here’s an excerpt:
<
p>
<
p>Lisa
jconway says
Excellent post Joel, I can say from first hand experience tutoring in a CPS school in Chicago that Duncan’s plan has left a lot of damage in its wake. Everyone should be on the same page and learning at the same level, forcing schools to compete against one another is really a race to the bottom, not the top. This funding mechanism is also inherently unfair and might violate several statues regarding education funding, particularly in the aftermath of the civil rights movement. Struggling urban schools need MORE MONEY, not less and punishing them for their existing lack of resources seems counter-intuitive.
joeltpatterson says
No reporter has asked Duncan why his reforms are not raising test scores (which is Duncan’s metric for success).
<
p>Duncan’s reforms in Chicago show a bump and then plateau on the NAEP metric:
If Duncan is interested in “whatever works” he should be able to explain why Chicago’s numbers stopped rising after his first year in charge.
joeltpatterson says
No reporter has asked Duncan why his reforms are not raising test scores (which is Duncan’s metric for success).
<
p>Duncan’s reforms in Chicago show a bump and then plateau on the NAEP metric:
If Duncan is interested in “whatever works” he should be able to explain why Chicago’s numbers stopped rising after his first year in charge.
jconway says
Duncan is part of a wider trend, within Chicago, but also across the country of finding good ‘managers’ and ‘consultants’ to improve standards as opposed to actual educators who have had experience either as teachers, principals, in some capacity. Even a member of the academy might make a good administrator. Yet instead we get stuck with MBAs who think they can retool a school like you would a business to become ‘results oriented’ and focused on ‘metrics’. The actual holistic learning experience of a child is nearly lost. Needless to say it is fitting his title when he was in Chicago was CEO-not educator.