Cahill has been a poor candidate at best, but Charlie Baker has given him a run for his money. Baker could be completely innocent of Cahill’s allegations–though encouraging Paul Loscocco’s defection is hard to brush off– but this lawsuit, even if it were baseless, promises to provide Baker and his campaign with bad press until election day.
There are plenty of documents to pore over, plenty of people to accuse, and plenty of campaign workers that need to be defended. And let’s just say it’s a bit suspicious that Cahill’s managers (who recently quit his campaign) worked on John McCain’s failed Presidential bid. Baker’s management also worked for McCain.
I’ve always thought there was a dirty tricks competition among a certain segment of GOP strategists. But with strategists like these, who needs opponents?
I’ve been thinking that Charlie Baker would do better in Mass if he could stifle the national GOP and its helpers. The Republican Governors Association ads and activities don’t seem to be helping to boost the perception of Baker as a stand-up guy. If I were guessing, I would think that Baker’s campaign itself has little to do with the Cahill defections; rather, it’s more likely national GOP groups. Baker would probably do better running his own campaign-I wouldn’t be surprised to find that he’s frustrated with his GOP national overlords.
<
p>Now that the barrage of outside money ads has started on the New Hampshire campaigns, I’m seeing the same kind of campaign snot that I suspect may not help GOP candidates there, either.
<
p>The next few weeks will be tough for all of us to take-the negative political ads will well outweigh the Viagra ads on evening TV.
At least when I clicked it, it took me to the Patrick campaign website.
What you saw is a “pre-roll”, an advertisement (15 seconds) paid for by the Deval Patrick campaign.
<
p>The video itself continues after the pre-roll.
<
p>Oh, and pre-rolls are an abomination that I despise.
Bay State voters can be forgiven if they think they are in a spacetime warp that somehow placed them down in Illinois!
<
p>My only worry is that all of this brouhaha will make voters even more cynical and keep them away from the polls. Our challenge is even harder now, I think, to GOTV!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M…
<
p>
<
p>Funny how specific it is as to what information was not received. No written information. Clearly any information received would have been emails and stuff, or electronic information.
Additional bolding mine –
<
p>
<
p>And as far as the statements being wiswhy-washy literal truth-telling (‘written’ media… and so on) – well, the same inmates are running the asylum, aren’t they?
you detailed earlier. They left an email trail? Good lord. Haven’t ready the lawsuit yet. But I will tonight.
http://www.harpers.org/archive…
<
p>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…
<
p>If you’re planning a betrayal, don’t freakin’ put it in writing.
http://www.harpers.org/archive…
<
p>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…
<
p>If you’re planning a betrayal, don’t freakin’ put it in writing.
Baker’s campaign staff is the same A-Team from the Kerry Healey disaster of a campaign. Very sleazy and out of touch with the people. There is a reason why there were constant rumors the Scott Brown campaign had major issues with the Baker camp at different events.
are all Massachusetts guys, not coming from the outside to run campaigns here?
<
p>Given the McCain connection, my “article” on Baker drafting Palin wasn’t that far off.
This campaign had been a substantive debate about the issues and solutions to our Commonwealth many challenges. Now, its degenerated into a junior high school blame game. I’m with Charlie, and was watching like everyone else his campaign move higher in recent polling. The people running the campaign know no other way then to go after Tim Cahill—I was on the other end of this in 2006 and instead of a laser-like focus on the Democrat, they were obsessed with the Independent. That these strategic bozos have embraced Lostcauso and that this plays out day after day is good for only one person in this race–the Governor. We all know they’re laughing over at Patrick/Murray headquarters. Anyone espousing that Doug Rubin is in the middle of this has no clue about reality. But, that’s the Healey folks tried and failed game plan, and that’s all they know.
Charlie should have been in another time zone when Lostcauso held a press conference last friday. Again, a colossal FUBR.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F…
Thanks, Christy. Really appreciate it, as well as appreciate the contribution you have made to public service in the Commonwealth.
NECN is reporting that Bob Meldrum ‘s Gmail account was mistakenly set to forward to his Cahill campaign account. Cahill got this off of his servers over the weekend. I cannot find the emails themselves anywhere, but WBUR does have a better version of the lawsuit posted. Emphasis mine.
<
p>
…are here:
<
p>http://www.boston.com/news/loc…
<
p>http://www.boston.com/news/loc…
<
p>They do seem to show that Meldrum, at least, was involved in GOP plotting while still employed by Cahill. Disgraceful. Still, Cahill could have just released the emails without the lawsuit, and gotten the same pr benefit without the risk of being painted as litigious whiner…and if he still wanted to pursue this later (whether for damages or just vengeance), filed suit after the election.
<
p>They only potential benefit I see to filing a lawsuit now (no time for discovery before the election) is the injunction he is seeking against his former people using any docs they took with them. Best guess, he thinks they might have something damaging and the lawsuit is a preemptive strike to try to stop it.
I was able to track down the entire complaint w/emails.
<
p>Damn, this is just insane. O’Brien is in there, the discussions of Loscocco leaving … everything. This is ugly and it’s connected to the Baker campaign.
<
p>I don’t see a way out for Baker here, especially with his rendezvous with Loscocco at the Seaport hotel before Cahill even knew of the defection.
Can someone OCR the PDF?
<
p>I skimmed it and one email exchange stuck out that puts to rest the Baker camp’s claims against Cahill.
<
p>Exhibit H
<
p>Oct 3rd at 1:09pm, Weaver replies to Yob who was asking about coordination between Cahill/Patrick or Cahill/Lottery, “Well, in fact, there was no coordination”
<
p>Oct 3rd at 1:20, Weaver replies to Yob again who insisted that he felt there was coordination. “Was what? coordination? hardly. Paul was kept out of the loop.”
BTW – any odds on these clowns getting the New Mexico gig? “I USUALLY get my stipend on the first of the month…AHEM!…”
Your link to the full suit has more emails not provided by the Globe, plus the agreement between Cahill and his erstwhile GOP consultants. No matter who one is with in this race, it’s incredible reading for any political junky.
<
p>This line from a Sept 26 email from Loscocco’s friend/lobbyist Jason Zanetti to the former Cahill consultants John Weaver and John Yob is priceless (p. 35):
<
p>
<
p>Hahahaha…How is that working out, guys? One of the few things clear about this situation is that Mr. Loscocco will never be trusted by anybody in Mass politics again.
<
p>Perhaps more seriously, Zanetti goes on the same email (which, bear in mind, was sent the Sunday before the Friday Loscocco defected and the Thursday night meeting with Baker to seal the deal):
<
p>
<
p>One can safely infer that “the pricipals” are Loscocco and Baker, who did end up having a private meeting at the Seaport Hotel Thursday nght…just like these guys planned. Baker says he didn’t hear anything at all about Loscocco joining his team until Thursday day when agreed to meet with Loscocco that night. I wonder how Baker feels that Zanetti and two GOP consultants not working for his campaign were able to plan four days in advance to put him in a “private location” with Loscocco to finalize something Baker knew nothing about until the day it happened? Baker has got to be incredible busy at this stage, how in the world could they plan on Sun for Baker to meet with Loscocco Thurs afternoon/evening specifically? Might the candidate not have other things on his plate one month before election day? If you believe Baker’s version of the timeline (as I am inclined to), it’s hard to escape the conclusion that Baker is not at all be in command of his own campaign at this point.
<
p>Anyway, with friends like these…