This is shared to continue the discussion; I am sure not all of us received it.
BARGAINING FOR THE LEAST OF THESE
By
Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.Finally, we have a President who stands up for the least of these! I applaud the President for finding a way to get the middle class tax cuts and the unemployed a new lease on life-to get them through the next 13 months and through the winter by extending unemployment insurance. I think the most urgent thing for the President to do was to lift up the least of these in the spirit of the upcoming holiday season. Tonight all over the news, a debate is going on about the compromise, but I will bet that among the least of these who have heard this news, there is no debate. There is just the joy and thanksgiving.
For those who have little or no income, the President has given them a survival line. I have listened to parents who saw no way to give their children a normal holiday season, and I have heard the fear and anguish in their voices about not being able to do so. We’ve been through too many fights during the past two years for us to believe that we have the luxury to turn down a chance to help the most vulnerable among us. The President refused to say poor people and the unemployed must wait until Congress could strike the perfect deal for them. The President understands why they cannot wait.
I believe in hard bargaining when you have got the power to back you up, but I don’t see the sense in an all or nothing approach when we don’t have the fire power to back up the President’s fight. If you ask the people who stood to lose the most-those with no job-I would be willing to bet they didn’t want the President to deny them a chance to have a few dollars to try to meet basic needs while our leaders are working to turn the economy around. No, they can’t wait.
The President did the right thing, whether we like it or not. The President knows well how to do the right thing-as opposed to always being right. The President has been out there working his heart out to resolve the challenges he inherited, and I applaud him.
I am sticking with the President, and trusting that he is doing the very best he can. This is an emergency action to handle a crisis. This President is realistic, and I am glad he chose to bargain for the least of these without playing political games while unemployed American suffer even more. Fighting just for the sake of fighting is not very smart. The President was smart enough to know this. Since I was a little girl, I was taught that we often have to compromise in life, and that in bargaining, no one gets everything he/she wants. The deal the President reached with a Party that has said “No” to everything for the past two years, is not perfect, but it is defensible, and I will stand with the President who is standing with the least of these. They are enjoying a victory tonight-and I am proud of this President who has accomplished so much, and has through this action on the issue of tax cuts for the middle class and unemployment insurance for the jobless made a lot of families happy. They know that a little bit of something for the least of these is better than a whole lot of nothing for all!
(Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq. is National Chair of the National Congress of Black Women, Inc. You may reach her by calling 202/678-6788.)
christopher says
It’s that once again the President started the negotiation with a signal of willingness to compromise. Yes, he got unemployment benefits, but he should have forced the GOP to go on record as a stand-alone. I have Laurence O’Donnell on now and watched him last night and he’s being infuriating. He’s smugly reminding people that he’s worked in the Senate and so knows how things “really work”. It’s a horrible precedent as the GOP is about to take over the House to say that the WH will concede anything and not force their hand. As for me, I’d be tempted to walk onto the House floor with a clothespin on my nose to cast my vote were I a member.
misterjefferson says
The president may have done the “right thing” for today, but keeping the poor only just able to survive ensures their subservient place in the economic caste system that the Republican party has spent years creating.
<
p>The amount of suffering, hunger, and pain that will follow as a result of this “compromise” in years to come will return to haunt all of those who didn’t have the courage to stand up and say “it’s not enough that I got my little piece today.” The future needed us to stand together so our children wouldn’t inherit a situation even worse than the one we are trying to survive.
<
p>After years of supporting Barak Obama, I’m now ashamed of his lack of courage and integrity, and I wonder how I could have made such a misguided choice two years ago.
<
p>Jefferson J
amberpaw says
When I read this post, what struck me was the willingness to settle for crumbs.
<
p>Reducing the payments into the Social Security trust is to lessen social security for more than 80% of the population.
<
p>Bernie Sanders had it so right tonight.
<
p>Your life may be different, but there is not one PENNY of pension money in my future, or that of my husband.
<
p>While public sector (i.e., government and quasi governmental agencies) have pensions, for those of us in the private sector, in the free-standing professions, or running businesses – there is only social security and various kinds of savings, some with tax protections.
<
p>No pension except for social security, which was part of the revolution to provide stability for the masses under FDR.
<
p>NOTE: dragons crouching on hoards of gold do NOT create jobs.