Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

Comments

  1. I don’t think you’ll find anyone on this site willing to defend Guy Glodis for any reason, never mind banning someone for expressing disgust at apparent corruption on his watch in the Worcester County Sheriff’s office.  This doesn’t surprise me at all…  

    • Google Chrome thinks this is a dangerous link:

      This is probably not the site you are looking for!
      You attempted to reach http://www.telegram.com, but instead you actually reached a server identifying itself as http://www.toledoblade.com. This may be caused by a misconfiguration on the server or by something more serious. An attacker on your network could be trying to get you to visit a fake (and potentially harmful) version of http://www.telegram.com. You should not proceed.

      • There is a problem with this website’s security certificate.

        The security certificate presented by this website was issued for a different website’s address.

        Security certificate problems may indicate an attempt to fool you or intercept any data you send to the server.  
         We recommend that you close this webpage and do not continue to this website.  
         Click here to close this webpage.  
         Continue to this website (not recommended).  
            More information

        If you arrived at this page by clicking a link, check the website address in the address bar to be sure that it is the address you were expecting.
        When going to a website with an address such as https://example.com, try adding the ‘www’ to the address, https://www.example.com.
        If you choose to ignore this error and continue, do not enter private information into the website.

        For more information, see “Certificate Errors” in Internet Explorer Help.

    • Correct question: Why would you say you would be banned for posting a link to a newspaper article?

      <

      p>Answer: Oh, I don’t know. So I’d get some attention?

  4. I would be banned if I expressed my feelings.
     I’ll probably be banned for posting this, but it needs to be known.

    <

    p>This overdeveloped sense of grievance and self-righteousness is emblematic of the scary fringe of the right wing.

    <

    p>TedF

  5. His posting of articles that reflect somewhat poorly on a losing primary candidate for a minor statewide office are a direct threat to the Democratic Party. He must be silenced.

      • …to prevent a banned poster from reincarnating under a different handle, especially if said poster uses a public computer and no consistent IP.

        • The RMG billxi  announces that he got banned on BMG and is now posting as MillburyMan. He even signs his actual name to a post.

          <

          p>I don’t think that rises to the level of “computer forensics”.

    •    The Personal care attendant for billxi. (PCA). Sometimes he makes a good point, sometimes he dosn’t. Sometimes I post from his apartment, sometimes I don’t. I hope that makes it easier for you amateur sleuths to understand.
        I understood the suspension of him for a month because of the trashing of Nicki Tsongas. Boy, we had a long discussion about that. Eventually he saw the light. But in no way should he have been banned after his suspension. So much for freedom there.
        Now you have Festus/Frank/Pogo/Simpleton. You allow him to say anything. Yes, I am aware of the lost wager last year. It just goes to show FFPS’s sense of honor and fairness. He has none.
        Now may we get back to the subject of the post?  

      • Do you mean this:

        <

        p>

        I’ll probably be banned for posting this, but it needs to be known.

        <

        p>Write a post for goodness sakes and maybe then you can expect comments.

        •    Wanting to make $445,000 last year. That’s $50.80 per hour EVERY hour of the day! Even while sleeping.
            Thank heaven, our new sherriff rides into West Boyleston tomorrow!  

          • save me the BS.  You wrote an idiotic post.  Write a real one and people will choose to read it or not.  That’s it.  Make sense?

      • …but I doubt it.  I assume he’s on Mass Health and is relying on tax payer dollars to pay you.  It’s typical of him, he rails against liberal nanny-state Bs, yet is the first to wave the ADA to insure he has access to wherever he goes.  Now I’m a support of the ADA, but it was passed after a decades long battle by liberals against conservative opposition.  Billxi is a complete fraud PERIOD

        •    You being such a fraud, you lead the league in it.
            Bill’s family paid me out of their own pocket to visit him almost daily while he was in the nursing home after his surgery. The real ripoff was Medicare paying $356 a day for his care. All he needed was an accessible apartment. $20,292 for 57 days. A good hotel would have been cheaper. Yes, costs can be reduced.
            Bill and I invite you to spend an hour in his wheelchair. Try it out! It’ll be an eye-opener. Or are you so pompous, you’d rather rail about others, but only pretend to be sympathetic.
            Thank you for speaking for Democrats about your prejudices against disabled people.
            All welcoming? My foot!
            Admit it: you’re just so blindly jealous about the parking thing eh?

          • People speak for themselves on here. The majority here opposed Glodis openly and vocally; one reason was suggested by your miss(ing)link: patronage.

            <

            p>And sympathy? People can feel sorry for somone’s disability and situation without giving a free pass on what he or she says and thinks.

            <

            p>I’m inclined to agree with KBusch on this one.  

Archives