Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Seesaw Coverage of Nuclear Power

March 23, 2011 By gmoke

Wald:  First visited a nuke in 1979 at CT Yankee.  An alternative press reporter was indignant she didn’t get to enter the reactor vessel.  General interest reporters don’t usually understand mechanical things or complex technologies.  NRC and nuclear power tend not to get much coverage.  News doesn’t talk about relative risks well [he mentioned deaths from different energy sources but not cancer].  At the current low price of natural gas, we won’t build nukes.  “Anxiety doesn’t stop construction.”  Economics does.  US spent fuel pools more densely packed than Fukushima and, if there is a change in waste policy, it will be to dry cask storage rather than Yucca Mountain or some other permanent waste storage.

Potter:  There are differences in the media that determine their relative coverage.  Newspapers are good for data and facts.  TV is good for images.  TV news is only 180 words per minute, about a third of average reading speed.  He showed a clip from the ABC Nightly News from 3/30/79, the TMI accident, and then a Martha Raddatz report which was critiqued by Wald for its characterization of risks and realities [Wald objected to the comparison of radiation to x-rays per hour and the categorical statement about spent fuel catching fire].

Bunn:  Initial information is almost always wrong, especially in a crisis.  Japanese coverage is much calmer than American.  US nuclear industry has been defensive, secretive, and, in some cases, counterfactual.  There needs to be a wider context.  We are also much less prepared for a security incident than an accident.  The prospect for huge growth in nuclear to combat climate change is remote.

Potter:  His Wall Street contacts are buying into nuclear because of China’s nuclear push and current low uranium prices.

Bunn:  4 nukes per year have been built in the last decade around the world.  We need 25 nukes per year to make a dent in climate change.

Wald:  Japan’s other fuel for electricity is liquid natural gas (LNG).  US won’t build a lot of anything because US demand is flat.  But rest of the world will.  Will we address climate change?  Doubtful.

Potter:  The narrative of US nuke power is that it’s an environmental safety issue.

Q:  For nukes to be safe we need transparency but nuclear is growing only in dictatorships.

Bunn:  Nuclear energy requires human excellence not just technical excellence.

Wald:  In US, air safety (and nuclear safety) are pushed more through competition with other companies than through regulation.

Q:  Signal to noise in news?

Wald:  Nobody understands what’s happening now and it is very difficult to say, “I don’t know.”

Q:  Boundaries of uncertainty?

Wald:  We gravitate to worst case but perhaps should be more concerned with likeliest case.

Potter:  On TV, it is short pieces on tight deadlines.  Not conducive to nuance or depth.

Bunn:  24 hour channels can do better with longer segments with experts who actually want to take advantage of the opportunity.

I was next in line when the moderator closed things down.  Would have asked about the historical context like interviews with Harold Denton of the TMI and Natalia Manzurova, who worked on the Chernobyl clean-up and now is touring the US under the sponsorship of Beyond Nuclear (http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/22/chernobyl-cleanup-survivors-message-for-japan-run-away-as-qui/).

————————————–

What’s Covered Up at Fukushima – interesting interview with longtime Japanese anti-nuker

http://www.counterpunch.com/ta…

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: climate-change, energy, fukushima, harvard, media, nuclear-power, random

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.