Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

“Just Politics” – Scott Brown’s Still Banking on Wall Street

December 22, 2011 By kevinf

Facing an increasingly long-shot reelection bid next year, Scott Brown has launched a Mitt Romney-style reinvention campaign, but his campaign coffers are still bursting with millions in Wall Street money from big bankers and financiers who know Scott Brown is on their side.

Massachusetts voters have seen this kind of sudden election year conversion before. His name is Mitt Romney.

Alabama Republican Sen. Richard Shelby may have accidentally spoken the truth a couple of days ago when he told POLITICO that he still has Brown’s back. Even though Brown has claimed to disagree with Shelby and other DC Republicans, the Alabama Republican sees Brown’s political calculated posturing for what it is.

“That’s politics,” said Shelby who last month held a recent high-dollar Wall Street fundraiser for Brown at a posh DC restaurant.

Wall Street and the Republican Party continue to rally around Scott Brown because they know that his politically calculated attempt to reinvent himself is just politics. Scott Brown has become just another Washington politician ready to do or say anything just to keep his job. The people of Massachusetts aren’t going to be fooled into believing he is something that he isn’t.

Earlier this month, a report from the non-partisan Center for Public Integrity noted that Wall Street interests and K Street lobbyists have “been working hard to help the freshman senator win his high-stakes battle for re-election.” The report also noted “deep-pocketed GOP allies” like Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS groups are already weighing in heavily in support of Brown.

In November, the New York Times reported that Wall Street is rallying around Brown, who they consider an important ally. Brown has taken more money from the financial services industry than any other senator, the paper said.

The bottom line is despite Brown’s Mitt Romney-style reinvention campaign, the junior senator is still banking on Wall Street paying for his campaign.

Kevin Franck is Communications Director for the Massachusetts Democratic Party. So there.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bmg, grassroots communicators, ma-sen, massachusetts-democratic-party, media, politics, scott-brown, senate

Comments

  1. JHM says

    December 22, 2011 at 12:01 pm

    Somebody or another amongst the Funders of Fratboy is pretty clever, to have come up with this :

    Brown calls for criminal investigation of Freddie, Fannie
    By Frank Quaratiello
    Thursday, December 22, 2011

    Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown is calling for a criminal investigation of former senior executives at mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including one-time Boston Fed chief Richard Syron.

    “The recently announced civil lawsuit against a few of the former senior executives of housing giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac does not go nearly far enough to achieve justice and accountability for the American people,” Brown wrote today in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder and Securities and Exchange Commissioner Mary Schapiro.

    One really should have seen that one coming, but I, for one, did not.

    Happy days.

    • hesterprynne says

      December 22, 2011 at 6:11 pm

      in going after the banks for their role in the foreclosure disaster, like he thinks Eric Holder has been with Freddie and Fannie?

      Coakley filed suit against five banks earlier this month, including Bank of America and JP Morgan. She’s also extracted settlements from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and the Royal Bank of Scotland. She charges the banks with violations of the (civil not criminal) consumer protection laws. And Brown’s beef with Eric Holder is that a civil lawsuit does not go nearly far enough. Maybe he’s right — somebody needs to go to jail. Hard to argue with this point that Brown makes:

      These companies hid their massive exposures to the subprime market accumulated over almost a decade through lending programs that offered “fast and easy” money and “liar loans” that failed even the most basic tests for sound mortgage underwriting practices.

      On the other hand, urging the criminal prosecution of his donor base is maybe too bold a move to expect? Consider the amounts each bank mentioned in this comment has given, through its PAC, to Brown’s Senatorial campaign so far this year:

      Bank of America: $7500
      JP Morgan: $2500
      Morgan Stanley: $2500
      Goldman Sachs: $2000
      RBS: $1000

      PS — If you want to troll through the thousand or so PAC’s contributing to Senator Brown’s campaign this year and last, the list is here (50 or so of the PAC’s are working against him). If you followed the story of Brown’s request for campaign dough to Koch Brother David Koch last May and are wondering how that turned out, the brothers have come through with $10,000 so far this year.

    • karenc says

      December 23, 2011 at 12:17 pm

      It will please the right as it fits their belief that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae caused the collapse. It also is yet another attack on Holder suggesting that he has not done what he should have here. And, best of all for Brown, is that it requires him to do absolutely nothing.

      This coupled with his hastily put together Congressional “inside trader” bill which will not be the bill that comes out of committee – if any bill does, is creating an image that Brown will likely use as a crusading opponent of corruption. In spite of him having never really having a record on this.

    • karenc says

      December 24, 2011 at 3:27 pm

      Senator Brown is grandstanding here for the RW using a myth that began with the American Enterprise Institute. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/opinion/nocera-the-big-lie.html?_r=1&hp

      So this is how the Big Lie works.

      You begin with a hypothesis that has a certain surface plausibility. You find an ally whose background suggests that he’s an “expert”; out of thin air, he devises “data.” You write articles in sympathetic publications, repeating the data endlessly; in time, some of these publications make your cause their own. Like-minded congressmen pick up your mantra and invite you to testify at hearings.

      You’re chosen for an investigative panel related to your topic. When other panel members, after inspecting your evidence, reject your thesis, you claim that they did so for ideological reasons. This, too, is repeated by your allies. Soon, the echo chamber you created drowns out dissenting views; even presidential candidates begin repeating the Big Lie.

      Thus has Peter Wallison, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and a former member of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, almost single-handedly created the myth that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac caused the financial crisis. His partner in crime is another A.E.I. scholar, Edward Pinto, who a very long time ago was Fannie’s chief credit officer. Pinto claims that as of June 2008, 27 million “risky” mortgages had been issued — “and a lion’s share was on Fannie and Freddie’s books,” as Wallison wrote recently. Never mind that his definition of “risky” is so all-encompassing that it includes mortgages with extremely low default rates as well as those with default rates nearing 30 percent. These latter mortgages were the ones created by the unholy alliance between subprime lenders and Wall Street. Pinto’s numbers are the Big Lie’s primary data point
      [/div]

      The sad thing is that the truth is so much more complicated that the lie – playing into the wariness of many to accept something complicated enough as to require a multi-paragraph explanation.

      • karenc says

        December 24, 2011 at 3:33 pm

        I messed up the blockquote

  2. pablophil says

    December 22, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    Maybe I am just bitter…disappointed, perhaps…but here goes: Nice to see Brown has something in common with the President. He’s still banking on Wall Street, too.

  3. Christopher says

    December 22, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    Nice spin from the party, but that’s really not the attitude we should take. The polls are within single digit margin of Warren and he has quite the warchest. I put odds at 50/50 right now.

    • bluewatch says

      December 22, 2011 at 4:38 pm

      Brown is definitely reacting to the polls, and he is trying to make headlines that make him look centrist. Brown is not panicking, however. He is a crafty politician with very deep pockets.

      Elizabeth Warren will need to raise a lot of money in order to be able to respond to non-stop attacks from Brown, Rove, and his buddies.

      • karenc says

        December 23, 2011 at 12:27 pm

        he really is tone deaf.

        Yesterday, he was on the Erin Burnett show on CNN as the latest of the Republican legislators she has brought on – rarely with any Democrat to balance them. The obvious topic was that his independence in calling the House Republicans out over their actions.

        But, listen to his answers on dealing with the debt problem. He is 100% against raising any tax rates – yet he babbles on about bipartisanship and working with people across the aisle. However, it is NOT bipartisanship when you take ALL tax increases off the table.

        http://outfront.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/22/sen-scott-brown-on-washington-gridlock-were-americans-first/

        • SomervilleTom says

          December 23, 2011 at 2:29 pm

          “Bipartisan” = “Swallow whatever we attempt to jam down your throat”

    • Mark L. Bail says

      December 24, 2011 at 5:17 pm

      Particularly at this juncture. Poll questions are unidimensional, and so, capture preference without its depth. Near the election, polls will have more prediction power.

      Brown’s in trouble, no question. I don’t think anything we say here will change how Warren runs her campaign. Burned by Coakley’s campaign three years ago, and with even more at stake, no one is going to take their eye of the ball here.

  4. ms says

    December 24, 2011 at 11:35 am

    The politicians, in election campaigns, speak with moderation. In fact, most campaign ads are “mom and apple pie,” which is basically nice-sounding fluff.

    But, Brown is funded by big banks because that is who he governs for.

    To win, Warren has to show the voters that she will do more for voters on pocketbook issues than Brown.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.