At this point all I can do is laugh when I think about how some of my friends on the far right were naive as to think that sensible Republicans in Congress had failed to heed the message of the 2012 election and the current political realities borne therefrom. The latest development in the fiscal cliff drama show to what degree some on the right have regained their senses and moved back to the center, in the direction of much needed compromise. Quoting political commentator Jennifer Steinhauer: “Ending a climactic fiscal showdown in the final hours of the 112th Congress, the House late Tuesday passed and sent to President Obama legislation to avert big income tax increases on most Americans and prevent large cuts in spending for the Pentagon and other government programs. The measure, brought to the House floor less than 24 hours after its passage in the Senate, was approved 257 to 167, with 85 Republicans joining 172 Democrats in voting to allow income taxes to rise for the first time in two decades, in this case for the highest-earning Americans…The decision by Republican leaders to allow the vote came despite widespread scorn among House Republicans for the bill, passed overwhelmingly by the Senate in the early hours of New Year’s Day. They were unhappy that it did not include significant spending cuts in health and other social programs, which they say are essential to any long-term solution to the nation’s debt.” Clearly and unequivocally the resolution of the fiscal cliff represents a major defeat for Grover Norquist and his Tea Party allies as well as a significant victory for president Obama.
And what of those Republican Congressman who voted to let tax rates rise? Remember how often we’ve been told that almost every Republican in the House had signed Grover Norquist’s “No Tax Pledge.” Quoting Politico’s Alexander Burns and Maggie Habberman: “…given the lopsided Senate vote in favor of the tax-hiking measure, as well as the 85 GOP House members who voted yes, members of the GOP have violated the party’s no-new-taxes orthodoxy for the first time in two decades. It’s a significant concession in the aftermath of Mitt Romney’s November defeat and a potentially existential moment for a party that has prided itself on a defiant and dogmatic dislike of tax increases. What remains to be seen is whether that is merely a tactical retreat — bowing to the unique circumstances of the fiscal cliff — or a more meaningful cave-in on the part of Republicans who believe that their anti-tax platform has become politically unsustainable, particularly after a presidential cycle in which the party found itself caricatured as the puppets of the rich and powerful.” Perhaps it was the fact that a large majority of Republican Senators had voted for a tax hike that finally drove home the political reality to the 85 Republican Congressional legislators who decided to follow suit. Why even such staunch conservatives as Congressman Paul Ryan and Senators Patrick J. Toomey and Tom Coburn voted in favor of raising taxes. The fact that, in the face of a growing fiscal crisis, that Republicans voted to raise revenue via tax hikes, should come as no surprise as 2012 election exit polling showed 75% of the voters supported said increases, including a large minority of those who voted for Mitt Romney. Fox News contributor and prominent conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer opined: “This is a complete surrender on everything” and “a rout.” Not surprisingly, Norquist himself appeared on the cable circuit claiming to Anderson Cooper, among others, that the “deal was technically not a pledge violation”, but then what would you expect to hear from a guy who just went off of his own political cliff.
Many on the right have been seen to try to spin this defeat as a tactical maneuver that takes taxes off the table thereby enabling the G.O.P. to be more hard-nosed in dealing with the debt ceiling / spending cuts debate that we’ll be revisiting in a few months. But this too may amount to nothing but wishful thinking. Again quoting Burns and Habberman: “The president’s party, meanwhile, has no intention of easing up on a GOP they believe is in serious disarray. And while Republicans take heart from the hope that they’ll have more leverage in the next showdown, emboldened Democrats say the demand for “balanced” deficit reduction — meaning both spending cuts and new taxes — remains a challenge for their foes. Democratic pollster Geoff Garin, who advised the pro-Obama super PAC Priorities USA, called the fiscal cliff deal “a band-aid on a serious wound” for Republicans. “The sane wing of the Republican Party recognized the GOP was playing a losing hand badly on taxes in a way that was deeply damaging to the Republican brand,” Garin said. “The Republicans will find themselves in a similar mess going forward if they insist on entitlement cuts while resisting new revenues from closing loopholes and tax breaks for those at the top.”
In the final analysis, when the spin and the political posturing is put aside there is one simple fact that comes through as the dust settles in the aftermath of the fiscal cliff and that is that Barack Obama has just cashed in on some major political capital and the sensible conservatives knew he had it to use and fully intended to use it. Obama ran, in part, on solving the fiscal crisis by raising taxes on the richest among us and won. America had two clear choices to pick from and they didn’t pick the conservative version. Much has been made of the fact that the G.O.P. had held onto the House but they only did so as a result of redistricting. In terms of absolute votes cast for those running for Congress, across the nation as a whole, “Democratic candidates for Congress won 1.1 million more votes than Republicans, according to a tally of the popular vote kept by David Wasserman, the House editor of The Cook Political Report.” The Republican leadership in Congress knows that winning as a result of map making means a lot less politically than does winning by popular appeal and presently the G.O.P. ranks near the low end of its historic popularity. More importantly, the American people have demanded compromise and they indicated that they are clearly fed up with Tea Party obstruction on Capitol Hill. This had to be a motivating factor for Republicans as it is they, not Obama and the Democrats who would have been blamed for the country’s sliding back into a recession. In the end President Obama wound up giving less in the way of concessions than he would have just two weeks ago when he bargained with John Boehner in search of a deal and dramatically less than he would have back in 2011 when he and the Speaker were on the verge of a “Grand Bargain.” Such is the measure of the political shift that has taken place since the Tea Party victories in 2010 and Obama’s re-election this past November.
Steven J. Gulitti
1/2/2013
Sources:
Jennifer Steinhauer: “Divided House Passes Tax Deal in End to Latest Fiscal Standoff”; http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/us/politics/house-takes-on-fiscal-cliff.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&ref=todayspaper
“John Boehner, Eric Cantor Split On Fiscal Cliff Deal”; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/john-boehner-eric-cantor_n_2395593.html?utm_source=DailyBrief&utm_campaign=010213&utm_medium=email&utm_content=FeatureTitle&utm_term=Daily%20Brief
Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei: “BEHIND THE CURTAIN — Why the GOP caved: The politics are horrible on the backside of the cliff”; http://www.politico.com/playbook/
“Tea party backers swallow a bitter pill in ‘cliff’ bill”; http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cliff-bill-is-a-bitter-pill-for-houses-tea-party-adherents-to-swallow/2013/01/01/5345286e-544d-11e2-8e84-e933f677fe68_story.html
“GOP anti-tax policy goes over the cliff”; http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/gop-anti-tax-policy-goes-over-the-cliff-85657.html
Charles Krauthammer: “Cliff deal a ‘rout”; http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/krauthammer-cliff-deal-surrender-85656.html?ml=po_r
“Why President Obama, Mitch McConnell took the deal”; http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/why-mcconnell-obama-took-the-deal-85655.html#ixzz2Gr6BLtPZ
“Obama hails tax bill, warns GOP not to pick fight on debt ceiling”; http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/275123-obama-hail-cliff-deal-but-warns-gop-on-debt-ceiling
“How Maps Helped Republicans Keep an Edge in the House”; http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/us/po
Here’s just one more example that supports my premise:
The new Paul Ryan; http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/the-new-paul-ryan-100990.html
To wit: ”
Ryan might find his name on an agreement that several dozens of House Republicans vote against. The bill raises revenue — which some conservatives call tax increases — and increases overall spending. It hardly touches the problems Republicans have spent years trying to fix, such as major changes to social safety net programs and a rewriting of the Tax Code.”
Well folks I guess it’s a wrap: “HOUSE PASSES CLEAN DEBT CEILING BILL – It was a long road, but Democrats joined just 28 Republicans last night to pass a bill lifting the debt ceiling until March 2015. Before government funding next runs dry Sept. 30 – and Congress faces its next big fiscal decision – Republican leaders say they’d like to transform their image from the opposition party to the alternative party, in part by passing their own health care reform bill. http://politi.co/1m2nfH7“
Why Boehner capitulated | TheHill http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/198159-why-the-speaker-had-to-capitulate-to-obama#.UvwZqGoHwKE.twitter via @TheHill
GOP CAVES ON DEBT CEILING – Manu Raju and Jake Sherman write for the hometown paper: “Less than three years ago, House Speaker John Boehner boldly demanded ‘trillions’ in spending cuts in exchange for raising the national borrowing limit. … ‘Without significant spending cuts and reforms to reduce our debt, there will be no debt limit increase.’ But on Tuesday, everything changed. Boehner violated his own rule by allowing the White House to win a year-long increase of the debt ceiling – with no strings attached. Senate Republican leaders urged their members to allow a quick final vote on Wednesday and drop filibuster attempts to prolong the debate.
— “In a private lunch, Senate Republicans were more concerned about ‘getting the hell out of town’ before an impending snowstorm than digging in on a fight they once relished, according to a GOP senator. And Boehner even privately told conservatives Tuesday they should be relieved because the concession got the ‘monkey off our backs,’ sources said. The sharp shift in tactics within the House and Senate GOP caucuses reflects a hardening realization after three years of partisan brinkmanship over the budget: Fighting over the debt in a crisis-like atmosphere is a political loser.” http://politi.co/1ntG8yb
THE FRONT PAGE – Wall Street Journal, 5-col. lead: “GOP Backs Off Fight on Debt Limit: Boehner Drops Policy Demands as House Passes ‘Clean” Bill to Extend Borrowing; Senate Could Vote Today.” NYT, 2-col. lead: “HOUSE APPROVES HIGHER DEBT LIMIT WITHOUT CONDITION: Boehner Ends 3 Years of Showdowns – Sharp Setback for Conservatives. L.A. Times: “House OKs higher debt limit: With Republicans unable to agree on restrictions, Boehner puts the bill to a vote, no strings attached.” Washington Post, 2-col. lead: “House approves ‘clean’ debt bill: SHOWDOWN OVER CEILING AVERTED: Measure attracts little Republican support.”
— THE DEBT CEILING VOTE WAS 221-201, with only 28 Republicans voting “yes.” They included: Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy and Chief Deputy Whip Peter Roskam, Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa, Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers, Foreign Affairs Chairman Ed Royce, Armed Services Chairman Buck McKeon and Natural Resources Chairman Doc Hastings. Roll Call’s Matt Fuller and Emma Dumain have the full breakdown: http://bit.ly/1iZItQF
REP. PETE KING (R-N.Y.) branded conservatives in his own party who oppose any effort to pass the debt limit “morons following Ted Cruz over the cliff.” Mario Trujillo in The Hill: http://bit.ly/1iOCIpq
It would seem that as time goes on my point here has been proven again and again:
U.S. House Republican unity tested on Obamacare alternative; http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/28/us-usa-healthcare-republicans-idUSBREA1R07U20140228
To wit: “A month after Republicans rallied around offering an alternative to President Barack Obama’s healthcare law in an election-year move to broaden their appeal to voters, divisions are surfacing over the issue in the U.S. House of Representatives. House Speaker John Boehner has not committed to voting this year on legislation to replace Obama’s landmark Affordable Care Act.
Different ideas are circulating among Republicans, ranging from those who want broad legislation to others who seek targeted measures….The often-fractured congressional Republicans had ended a retreat outside of Washington on January 31, delighted that they had settled on an agenda for 2014 that centered on replacing the law, which has had a troubled rollout.
Republicans had been concerned that simply voting to repeal the law, as they have done more than 40 times, would not be enough to carry them through November’s congressional elections. Boehner, the top U.S. Republican, told reporters on Thursday that it was important for the party to come up with “better solutions” on healthcare.”