Why Marty? It’s a question I have fielded a LOT in the last few months. I understand that. On the surface, we may seem like rather unlikely friends. Beyond the shared background – we’re both Irish-American, Catholic school-educated and from working-class families in Dorchester – we’ve taken very different paths. But we’ve arrived at very similar places, and for some reason, my progressive bona fides are seldom questioned, while people assume that he is just another in a long line of white Irish Catholic guys from Dorchester. (I’d argue that of this particular line, he is most like Joe Moakley, but that’s another essay!) Marty and I share core values: equality, access, transparency and social justice. I believe he’s the most progressive candidate in this race, but more importantly, he is positioned to be the most effective, able to bring disparate voices to the table and convince them to work together. I’ve seen it.
Marty called the night we learned of Mayor Menino’s decision, to tell me he was running for mayor. I fully committed to him without hesitation. “Whatever you need.” We’ve known each other a long time, and we’ve worked closely together on many things, including the elections of Barack Obama, Deval Patrick, and Elizabeth Warren (we delivered 83% of the Dorchester vote under his leadership), as well as the U.S. Senate campaign of Mike Capuano, in which, for the record, we handily won Dorchester. He also asked me to help out on the first two city council campaigns for John Connolly (which I did), and introduced me to Felix Arroyo, who I have also supported in the past. I have several friends in this race, and we’re lucky to have a good field of candidates. But there is no better candidate for Mayor of Boston than Marty Walsh.
Early on, one reporter called to ask why I wasn’t waiting to see if a woman gets into the race. She was surprised when I told her that Marty has a great legislative record on women’s issues, and I had no doubt that he would continue to fight for my rights at every turn. Not all feminists are women, just like not all women are feminists. Marty is a feminist. Ask him. He’ll tell you. He’ll talk about pay equity, and a woman’s right to choose. He’ll mention buffer zones around abortion clinics, and access to birth control, a lack of sports programs for girls and how badly he wants to put an end to human trafficking. I realize that most of you don’t have my vantage point in this, and haven’t seen the way he is genuinely moved when someone is being abused or treated unfairly. But – here’s the difference – he has introduced bills in the legislature that address these things, and voted on these very issues. It’s easy to state a position; it’s harder to legislate one.
Other people asked if I was with him just because we’re friends. I told them that’s about 10% of my reasoning, but the other 90% was because of his record, and his character. I’ve seen his work in the trenches, and been on the other end of a broken lunch date because someone needed a detox bed, or a re-entry program. Marty and I have worked extensively together on issues of substance abuse, which has touched both of our families. I’d bet anything it’s touched every single one of yours as well. Marty is a person who will stop at nothing to help people in need. I have also seen him walk into a room full of my friends – super progressives – many of whom have an idea, based on his demographic, that he is a vestige of another time. They all walk away supporters, impressed by a guy with a depth and breadth of knowledge and compassion, and an openness and willingness to listen. They’re converted. This is why so many of my friends are actually working on this campaign.
Marty has it all as a candidate and a leader. Where other candidates may appear to be superficial, Marty has an impressive grasp of issues of economic development, workforce development, education and public safety, but more importantly, an understanding of the root causes of the problems that hold us back in these areas. Through this campaign, I have been continually impressed during policy discussions, when the ideas are flowing and people are excited, and Marty steps in with the concept that just crystallizes the position, and then leads us to the idea that will help solve the problem. His ability to do this is rooted in his willingness to listen to people and acknowledge different points of view. He has a great analytical mind, and a nuts-and-bolts knowledge of the way policy is moved.
I’ve never seen anyone with a greater gift for bringing disparate voices to a table, leading them to their common goals, and getting them to work together toward the solution. He has done this time and time again over an impressive career, but two instances stand out for me.
I think many of us have forgotten, now that we have led the rest of the country to see that diverse families actually STRENGTHEN our communities, what a contentious time we saw in Massachusetts when a few “family values” interests attempted to put the issue on the ballot, after the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed equal marriage. It’s easy to forget. It was a long time ago. Ten years later, it’s all so normal. But then, it wasn’t, and as the Massachusetts house began to debate the issue, LGBTQ leaders on Beacon Hill went to Marty to lead their fight. They knew that having a white Irish Catholic man from Dorchester make the case would sway the votes they needed to defeat the measure. So, he acted as the Floor Whip for MassEquality during the debate. Marty didn’t hesitate when asked, despite the fact he knew there would be considerable resistance from the conservative corners of his very diverse district. Leaders of that movement continue to single him out for his assistance, and he calls it his proudest vote. From what I can tell, all but two of the 12 candidates in this race are on the right side of the equality issue, but only one has had to stand up, facing resistance from his base, and vote on it.
The second thing everyone needs to know about Marty is that he started a program called Building Pathways. When he became the head of the Building Trades a few years ago, he looked out over a room of white men, and realized the trades needed to diversify. He conceived this first-of-its-kind pre-apprenticeship program that guarantees union placement and well-paying jobs to underserved communities, mostly people of color and women. There are many apprenticeship programs, but this is the only one that guarantees placement, and it has become a national model. There was resistance from the trades, but Marty persevered, and now they compete for the graduates. There has been a lot of talk about Building Pathways on the campaign trail, because the idea of offering opportunity to people appeals to many. I’ve really enjoyed meeting the graduates of this program. They are impressive people who have so much to offer the world, and this opportunity Marty created and they pursued will allow them to do this. That’s good for our City. The piece of this I really like though comes from a different perspective; a program like this actually strengthens the unions. As populations change, unions must change to stay relevant. This relates to reframing the conversation around Labor, and communicating its importance as an economic driver in Boston and around the country. As the income gap grows larger, and the very existence of the middle class is threatened, we need to organize more than ever. We won’t be able to do that until some of the unions themselves evolve, and I see Building Pathways as a piece of this evolution.
In his 17 year career on Beacon Hill, and as a community activist before that, he has accomplished great things. Dorchester is a MUCH better place for his service. When I talk to someone from our neighborhood who is supporting someone else, I point to the Red Line stations that spurred so much development here; Pope John Paul II Park and the Neponset Trail; Carney Hospital, still open despite MANY attempts to close it; all of the sports and arts and social programs he has championed. The list goes on and on. Thankfully, most of them get it.
Marty Walsh is my friend, and he is my candidate for Mayor. I say this loudly, unequivocally and without reservation. What I can also say without equivocation is that he is the best candidate in this race. I am asking you personally to cast your vote for him on Tuesday. I promise that if you think you share my values, it’s a vote you’ll never regret.
Joyce
hlpeary says
JL: You make a strong and reasoned case for Mr. Walsh. He is lucky to have such a friend and supporter.
jconway says
As a Cantabridgian, I have no horse in this race. But I’m heartened to see a candidate from a blue collar background bring together the trades, minorities, feminists, LGBTQ and progressives together in a winning coalition. The New Deal, Civil Rights movements, Equal Rights and Marriage Equality movements were built on similar coalitions and I am hopeful the movement
to end income inequality can have a similar champion and bridge builder.
I am a big Felix fan, but it seems that Walsh has the momentum. I’d be very happy if one of those two made it to the runoff.
mike_cote says
I am also from Dorchester and have been leaning towards voting for Marty for sometime now.
However, on Friday, I received a robocall from Stephen Lynch supporting Marty.
Since I totally loath and despise Mr. Lynch and the reprehensible positions he has taken on a number of issues, including LGBT and Healthcare issues, my confidence and my desire to support ONLY Progressive candidates has been shaken to its core. I believe this will be a deal-breaker for me. Why should it not be a deal-breaker?
jlinehan says
I too have problems with the politics of the Congressman, BUT I can’t deny that he has been great for our neighborhood health centers and on issues of substance abuse. He was also great just last week in standing up to the knuckleheads in the kerfuffle over whether Senator Forry should be hosting the breakfast. Nothing is simple. The Congressman’s support of Marty is based on years of personal friendship and in no way takes away from Marty’s progressivism. Congressman Lynch also supported Senator Warren and Congressman Capuano when he ran for Senate.
Vote Marty!
striker57 says
After the Primary Congressman Lynch actively supported Ed Markey in the final. He worked with his supporters to move that vote to the progressive candidate.
And Marty Walsh is the only candidate in the race with a voting record on progressive issues. Pro-choice, pro-equal marriage, pro-affordable health care for all. He has a decade of progressive votes that are on the record.
I think it goes to Marty Walsh’s ability to bring Boston together that he can be supported by Congressman Lynch and the Hotel Workers Local #26 at the same time.
mike_cote says
I decided not to hold the sins of Stephen F’n Lynch against Marty and voted for Marty today.
Why:
This morning, I was watching Star Trek: The Next Generation and was reminded of the episode titled, “Sins of the Father”. Nearly everything I know, I learned from either Gene Roddenberry, et. al. or J.R.R. Tolkien.
Thank you for the comments that talked me off the ledge.
fenway49 says
devoid of all the things that made Lynch objectionable to me.
mike_cote says
particularly on the objectionable issues.
Christopher says
…Lynch was never the embodiment of evil you like to make him out to be. I can think of plenty worse.
mike_cote says
when the Ward 16 Democratic Committee met a few weeks ago, there were a number of candidates I was inclined to vote for. However, when push came to shove, as an elected member of the Ward 16 Committee, I voted to endorse Marty Walsh because it is my belief that that is what the electorate wanted within Ward 16.
When Lynch voted against the Affordable Health Care, of which he claimed to be proud of having done during the Senate Campaign, I don’t believe he voted in the best interest of the people in his district, he voted believing someday he would be running against Scott Brown, and his desire for higher office overcame his responsibility to represent the people in his district IMHO. As such, based on that calculus alone, I believe he is just as ANTI-Progressive values any the dozens of Republicans in the House of Representatives, who at least have the decency to put an R next to their name when running and seeking to destroy the USA and the people therein. I can think of no politician in Massachusetts or in the USA (and I am including Bachman and Goemert in that) who I believe more misrepresents his or her constituants. That is my opinion and I am sticking to it.
When I vote tomorrow, I am not voting as a ward 16 member, but as a resident of Boston, so whether this proves to be a deal-breaker remains to be seen.
jconway says
Now that Artur Davis quit the House and became a Republican, Dan Lipinski and Lynch are some of the most conservative Democrats for the double digit D+ districts they represent. Lipinski is far worse than Lynch though, and unfortunately he has strong backers in Madigan so it’s unlikely he will go anywhere.
Lynch had the decency to repudiate most of his social conservatism, but just last week Lipinski sponsored legislation allowing wedding planners to discriminate against gays and has sponsored most of the bullshit anti ACA ‘religious freedom’ BS.
brianmiddleton says
….for an eloquent statement that actually tipped the balance for me. I was leaning toward Connolly, and I still haven’t ruled out voting for him in November. But what you wrote crystallized for me that we really need Marty on the ballot. He and Felix Arroyo are the two candidates who consistently emphasized working and low-income people in their campaign messages. I did think about voting for Felix, but I’m honestly not sure he’s ready, and I know Marty is.
jlinehan says
Let me know what I need to do to get him your vote in November!