I received the following email today, news which also lit up my Facebook feed. Also, it looks like Sen. Schumer is best positioned to become Democratic Leader in the next Congress in light of today’s announcement by Sen. Reid that he won’t seek re-election. Not sure that bodes well for the Warren wing of the party.
|
Wall Street has colonized the Republican Party, and now is about to install its double agent at the head of the Senate Democrats. Warren is the last gasp of a legitimate two-party system in this country.
Death Race is one of the dumbest movies I’ve ever watched, but I do remember how the leader of dystopian America was the head of the “Bipartisan Party”. Fiction coming true?
Shocking offer from Citigroup and other Wall Street Banks: if Warren stops talking about breaking them up, then, they will contribute to Democratic Senators.
Citigroup and Wall Street are really flexing their muscles. They want to own both political parties. Kudos to Warren for calling them out.
And this the same day that Chuck Schumer (D-Wall Street) seems to have locked up the #1 position in the Senate after Reid’s retirement at the end of this term…
…and he will be elected easily, possibly without opposition. Durbin has said he won’t contest the race and Warren also says she is not running. This is an opportunity to fight out where the Senate Conference is IMO.
One other possibility is Patty Murray. She could become the first female senate leader.
And, the vote doesn’t occur until January, 2017. The voters will be the member of the new Democratic senate. So, Schumer is trying to pretend that he has it locked up, but he hasn’t.
Warren’s address from a couple of years ago, comparing the consequences for bank executives who loot billions to the consequences for small time crooks who steal thousands, is more appropriate than ever. Now the banksters are trying to extort the government directly. “Nice campaign-funding operation you got here. Be a shame if anything happened to it.”
I’m sure this
extortionexpression of free speech is all perfectly legal.In light of the recent clean bill of health given Massachusetts government by Harvard’s “Edmond J. Safra Center For Ethics”, I wonder what the same erstwhile center has to say about this racket.
Would they consider it “legal corruption”, “illegal corruption”, or no corruption at all?
Better poll some journalists to find out the “truth”.
…and I assume we mean their PACs since corporate donations have been illegal for ages, it’s also legal for them to choose not to give to someone. We really need to get to an individual-only donation regime if not mandatory public financing.
Acting together, a small number of Wall Street banks have a huge amount of power. They are using their concentrated political power to stop Elizabeth Warren from criticizing them and regulating them. Basically, they are buying themselves a government that will be kind to them. To me, that represents pure corruption of our democracy.
It might be legal, but it isn’t right. Elizabeth Warren was correct. Citigroup should be broken up.
…if you are “too big to fail” you are simply too big – period.
…because it took away the clout of unions on the other side of the political spectrum.
Now the tactics used by unions for decades are being used on Democrats and they don’t like it much.
Public financing will be hard to justify in the light of both defecits and service cuts.
Human only donation is the only solution to this. It protects free speech and creates a truly level playing field. Both sides need to stop contorting campaign finance laws to protect THEIR base donors while restricting the other guy.
Link to Double Down on Banksters