I really detest the focus of the media on the murderer. I’m not interested in what he looks like. I’m not especially interested in his views. I’m not interested in his history. We get it at this point. We know who these people are. He can be studied by specialists. He forfeited the right to take up a second of my precious time on this earth when he murdered my fellow human beings.
I studied terrorism in college with the ancient Ernst Halperin- quaint now that in order to study the topic we mainly focused on the anarchism of the early 20th century. The point of terrorism is NOT primarily to terrorize. It is to convert others to see the world from the terrorist’s point of view. Virtually no one in the media understands this.
JimC says
But unfortunately coverage is necessary. Authorities need to know everything they can about this guy, especially if he has ties to others who might do similar things, and coverage helps to bring people forward.
merrimackguy says
combat these tragedies. I think extensive media coverage does encourage more of these, but it’s unclear to me how you would restrict it.
If you’re not familiar
Christopher says
…since anything compulsory would be an obvious 1st amendment violation.
merrimackguy says
where many of the wounded are being treated. I assume everyone else is doing that as well.
jconway says
I’m still incensed by the Rolling Stone cover for Tsarnaev, but I helped friends scour our Facebook photos, walls and newsfeeds for photos of the brothers to help the police and give to media. It was a way to feel useful when I was in Chicago, though it was still jarring to see teachers and friends on international television. And it ultimately led to their apprehension. It helped capture the at large terrorists in Belgium and France after the attacks their too.