Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

No On 2 in a Historical Perspective

October 17, 2016 By joeltpatterson

Why are so many Republicans and billionaires pushing Question 2?*

Prof. Robert Weintraub at BU Today offers us more thoughtful context on Question 2. BMG readers, click the link and read the whole thing. There is a broader context for these ideas of denigrating public schools (it fits with Reagan’s denigration of the government), and there is a good explanation of the bad math behind saying that international test show US schools are worse than Singapore’s or China’s. But what really packs a punch is when we learn where all those district dollars end up after new charters schools open:

Perhaps the least known characteristic of charters is that our taxes are taken from our public schools and enrich private investors. Typically, charter schools operate as nonprofits. However, the buildings in which they operate are generally owned by private landlords who benefit financially from taxes that are transferred to the operation of charters.

David Brain, head of the large real estate investment firm Entertainment Properties Trust at the time, appeared on CNBC in 2012 to tell audiences just how lucrative charter school investment has become. In response to a question about the most profitable sector in real estate investment, he said, “Well, I think probably the charter school business.”

This misuse of the public’s education dollars to enrich real estate tycoons helps to explain why a few incredibly wealthy people (who would send their children to private schools anyway) fund Question 2 but hide their identities, as Prof. Maurice Cunningham has written.  (By the way, Maurice Cunningham has no opinion on charters, he just objects to dark money in politics.)

It’s no wonder this election has strong progressives like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, AG Maura Healey, Rep. Capuno, State Sen. Pat Jehlen, and many more lining up to vote No along with 170+ school committees and so many grassroots activists.

Vote No on 2.

 

*Sure, you can find some non-Republican, non-billionaires who support Question 2–but the question is, why are Republicans and billionaires–people mostly opposed to progress on income inequality–pushing for a rapid expansion of charters?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: education, funding, NoOn2

Comments

  1. johntmay says

    October 19, 2016 at 4:55 pm

    rent seeking is the new “capitalism”. The rich want to own the schools and then rent them to us.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.