For years, going back into the Patrick administration, the Republican members of the House of Representatives have staged a show during that chamber’s annual budget debate in which they offer an amendment to focus universal opprobrium on immigrants living in Massachusetts, whom they also misleadingly depict as criminals who are taking advantage of public benefits.
They then invite Howie Carr into the mix. He uses one or both of his platforms to stir the consumers of his content into a frenzy of angry telephone calls to House members urging them to support whatever odious amendments are on tap that year. Viz:
These shows have rewarded the GOP not only with a media spotlight, but also with a record of roll-call votes to be used in the next election against those Democratic incumbents who were not cowed into voting in favor.
But this year, something different happened. GOP Representative James Lyons (yes, that “gun-loving, immigrant-bashing Tea Partier“) had followed the script by filing an amendment to allow federal ICE agents to hold immigrants without an arrest warrant (which is now not permissible in Massachusetts), and had appeared on Carr’s radio show to stir up the listeners. Lyons was joined by GOP reps Geoff Diehl and Peter Durant in arguing for the amendment. Democratic Representatives Tucker, Provost and Decker spoke eloquently of the many reasons why the amendment ought to be defeated.
In the surprising roll-call vote that followed, only nine Republicans supported the amendment. Twice as many of them voted with the Democrats in opposition. (Roll call vote #334, link here.)
Is it too soon to hope that the GOP’s xenophobic fever is breaking?
SomervilleTom says
It is great news.
Yes, it is too soon to have any such rash hopes.
Well, hope springs eternal. Let’s see what happens over the next few months as the full impact of the utter moral, ethical, and ideological bankruptcy of the GOP becomes more clear even to Fox viewers.
Christopher says
True leaders should never be afraid of roll calls.
pogo says
Thank you Hester for this information. Is this the same amendment that would have allowed the state to deny funding to “sanctuary city” communities…or is that yet another amendment that the deadeners in the MA GOP filed?
hesterprynne says
Hi Pogo – the amendment to let the state deny funding was a different one. It was sponsored by Rep. Marc Lombardo. It didn’t come up for a vote because he withdrew it.