Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Comment of the day: “Clean Peak is junk planning”

May 23, 2018 By Charley on the MTA

Tommy Vitolo, our stomv, is a PhD energy expert at Synapse Energy. He is also a candidate for State Rep in Brookline, whom one should support enthusiastically and without reservation, natch. He, uh, demurs from Secretary Beaton’s strategy on avoiding “dirty peaks” in energy usage. The whole idea is off, he’s saying, because gas is dirty, and it’s running all the time.

Clean Peak is junk planning.

I write this as an electricity planning professional, though (as always) not on behalf of my employer or any client.

We need to transition to cleaner and cleaner energy, and one constant roadblock will always be cost. If clean is cheaper, it’s pretty easy to do. Same cost? Some challenges? A hair more expensive? OK, we can do some of that in MA. More expensive than that? Well, that’s tough.

Those oil-fired generators? They’re built and paid for. They provide an important reliability service in that they’re able to go when other supplies — including wind and solar and hydro — are inadequate. Clean peak standards elsewhere in the country have been used to justify exactly what the Boston Globe editorial pages have been arguing — replace 1% of oil and 2% of coal (page 14) with something “clean” — energy storage or natural gas or biomass or some kinds of hydro. Can’t use wind or solar, because it’s not dispatchable. Of those, which do you think is most easily sited and is low cost? Natural gas. Once that generator is built, do you think they’ll only use it between 1 and 3 percent of the hours of the year? Hint: they won’t.

If you care about local air pollution, you designate a region, set a standard, and require compliance, letting the chips fall where they may. If, on the other hand, you care about carbon pollution, than worrying about 1% oil or 2% coal isn’t the action in New England — it’s the 49 percent natural gas you need to be worried about. And, because gas is being used every single one of the 8760 hours of the year, bringing on any renewable energy of any technology is guaranteed to avoid fossil during all hours of the year it operates. Any new wind or hydro or solar or energy efficiency or geothermal in New England will displace far more CO2 from gas than it will from oil and coal — because gas is where the lion’s share of the emissions are.

But wait, you say — clean peak helps incentivize generating capacity on the hours when it’s the most valuable! Won’t we need that if we’re going to transition away from dispatchable fossil fuels? Well, yes, we’ll need it. But we already have a mechanism to get it, and we, the consumers, already pay for it. It’s the capacity market. We pay generators for their ability to generate during times of highest need. If there’s not enough capacity for or near-term future, the market price goes up until we gain more capacity. If we do have enough, prices stay low and we don’t get more.

The Clean Peak is a clever marketing turn of phrase in search of a problem. In places like Arizona (where it’s popular), they don’t have a capacity market (nor do they have virtually no coal, a winter that consumes natural gas for heat, or an especially sane legislature). It doesn’t make a whit of sense in New England and, in my view, actually works against our public policy goals if any amount of natural gas ever qualifies as “clean”.

It’s also troublesome because it’s forcing — it prescribes a specific solution, complete with arbitrary fractions and limits — to solving a problem that need not be overly constrained. For the foreseeable future, we don’t have any problems with reliability or with overgeneration of renewables. As either of those two realities approach, we will need to start doing some easy, cool stuff, including (1) more targeted energy efficiency to reduce load, (2) time varying electric rates along with IoT devices that control charging EVs & electric water heaters to push load around, and (3) customer-sited, distribution grid-sited, and transmission grid-sited battery storage to manage the diurnal supply/demand mismatches.

Even the charts provided — they’re not helpful. The oil just isn’t the problem. Make that same chart with all 8760 hours of the year, and you’ll see how minuscule the oil consumption is. The problem is the gas, and we’re a long way from needing any storage to deal with it because any new wind, solar, energy efficiency, or hydro will simply swap out for natural gas each hour its operating [and occasionally coal or oil, like maybe a handful of hours a year.

Eyes on the prize. RPS must grow 3 percent or more each year, and municipal electric utilities must be obligated to comply. 1600 MW offshore wind: build it, and contract for more. Fix (eliminate) the 1st in the nation solar charges on residential customers we inflicted in MA. Use dollars to install more solar on local, regional, state, and quasi- owned buildings — that there is a single roof owned by the people of Massachusetts that doesn’t have solar on it is a political, social & economic justice, and environmental disaster of missed opportunity. Fix the dang gas leaks. Improve energy efficiency programs to overcome split-energy challenges [e.g. electric A/C but gas heating] and split incentives [e.g. tenant pays bill, landlord owns physical infrastructure] so that we’re consuming less oil, gas, and electricity. EVs — buses, municipal trucks and cars, and private autos that charge curbside, at work parking lots, at apartment buildings, and in home garages — must be deployed with emphatic, broad, and supportive cross-jurisdictional & cross-agency policies.

We know what we need to do for 80% CO2 reduction by 2050. Don’t play buzzword bingo. Don’t dream, don’t dicker, don’t delay. Deploy.

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
+1
0

Filed Under: Editor

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3 Apr

OTR: Diana DiZoglio discusses potential retaliation from Mass. Legislature over audit https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/otr-diana-dizoglio-discusses-potential-retaliation-from-mass-legislature-over-audit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Retweet on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Like on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Twitter 1642902408245420032
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mass. Conservatives Win Big in Second MassGOP Caucus: Crush Baker 2.0/Establishment Candidate https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mass-conservatives-win-big-in-second-massgop-caucus-crush-baker-2-0-establishment-candidate/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Retweet on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Like on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Twitter 1642902143123202050
sabadosama Lindsay Sabadosa @sabadosama ·
3 Apr

A huge pleasure to join @RepDylan as he launched the #Massachusetts Friends of UK Legislative Caucus at the home of the @FCDOPeterAbbott. It was wonderful to talk about how we can collaborate to benefit constituents and deepen long-standing ties! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Retweet on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Like on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Twitter 1642900909020569600
theaaholcomb Thea Holcomb @theaaholcomb ·
3 Apr

If you're familiar with #mapoli I have questions for you!

My intern is applying for an internship there - obvs I'm thrilled. 😊 What should she know about how the MA legislature is staffed? What other essential knowledge would you pass along?

Reply on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Retweet on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Like on Twitter 1642899676125970436 1 Twitter 1642899676125970436
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mounting evidence that the citizens of MA are over taxed https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mounting-evidence-that-the-citizens-of-ma-are-over-taxed/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Retweet on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Like on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Twitter 1642898875705970690
erintiernan Erin Tiernan @erintiernan ·
3 Apr

It's April in #mapoli which means budget season is in full swing. The House will soon pitch a tax relief proposal alongside their 2024 fiscal plan.
- @MBTA staffing shortage cou;d keep trains from running on time
- Auditor DiZoglio won't back down
https://masster-list.com/2023/04/03/massachusetts-house-tax-package-could-be-a-tango-with-healey/

Reply on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Retweet on Twitter 1642898790221770752 1 Like on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Twitter 1642898790221770752
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.