From the Washington Post:
The following graphs illustrates the ranking and comparative trends of income inequality between 2012 and 2013, with the top table ranking those cities with the most income inequality and the bottom table ranking the cities with the least:
Please share widely!
How do we deal with the fact that some cities include sprawling suburbs whereas others (like Boston) are surrounded by cities and towns that would be gobbled up by Boston were they in another portion of the country?
And, a local question: How the hell is the 20th percentile in Boston only $16k but 20th percentile Nashville $21.4k? Good grief!
Doesn’t New York City have a special tax only for residents of the city? If Boston had one it would help to make the 1%’ers pay for the city, your MBTA underfunding would be better and the money could be used specifically for problems inherent to city life.
If you work in NYC you have to pay them income tax. You don’t have to live there.
Just as good.
…that was sourced by the Post is here.
Not all cities have the ability or right to annex neighboring municipalities without their consent; in addition increased income inequality is not a Boston-specific trend within the region, but is a statewide dynamic, particularly within 495.
Purely as a working hypothesis I think that migration patterns in Boston (which has been exporting its working class for three decades (and this does not include white flight in prior years), while importing lower-income unskilled labor from abroad; and selectively bad pubic education) are the reasons for the datum referenced by your second question: our poor are getting poorer.
To pick up on Bob’s comment that Boston is on the Olympic podium in the income inequality competition, an excerpt from a post on the enormous wealth that is concentrated in the leadership of Boston 2024:
Do we know that the cited individuals actually reside within the region identified as “Boston” in the above chart?
I share the disdain for Boston 2024 and its organizers, I’m just not sure that these wealthy individuals were actually included in the cited research.
It would appear there id a link between progressive leadership and policies and the exacerbation of income inequality.