Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

A New Interface to Review MA Legislators’ Progressive Records!

April 12, 2017 By Progressive Massachusetts

As progressives across the Commonwealth are looking to get more engaged in politics at the state level, a new resource from Progressive Massachusetts (scorecard.progressivemass.com) can help voters see where their State Representatives and State Senators stand on critical issues and bills.

Voters now can easily monitor how their senators and representatives on Beacon Hill are voting on priorities identified by the grassroots organization. Bills from the Progressive Mass Legislative Agenda are highlighted, focusing on policies advancing economic and social justice, democratic participation, and investments in a sustainable future.

Caroline Bays, co-chair of chapter Progressive Watertown, argues that the best way to fight the reactionary agenda from Washington is through vigorous leadership at the state level.

“MA should be a leader in treating health care as a human right, dismantling racist mass incarceration, funding quality education for all our kids, fighting climate change, guaranteeing a living wage, and protecting the rights of our immigrant neighbors. But despite a Democratic legislature, we are not. The scorecard helps show where we need more courage and leadership. If not during a Trump and Paul Ryan era, then when?”

Many voters new to state-level advocacy are surprised to learn how difficult it is to track their elected representatives’ positions, even while some Beacon Hill insiders caution that scorecards are a limited view into a legislator’s record.

Yet, “roll call votes are one of the few records available to us,” co-chair of the Progressive Mass Issues Committee, Jonathan Cohn, said. “A fuller picture could be achieved with transparency in Committee votes, open meeting laws, and more roll calls from the floor.”

Progressive Mass began its scorecard in 2013, as a densely packed grid of color-coded pluses and minuses. The clean and user-friendly new presentation of was developed by Alex Holachek, a Cambridge-based front-end developer.

“Progressive Mass’s research helped me assess my legislators’  priorities; it was everything I was trying to learn, but the presentation was daunting,” she said. “In developing this new searchable and sortable interface, my aim is to expand the audience for this valuable work.”

After November’s election, many tech innovators and designers are eager to put their skills to work for progressive causes, according to Harmony Wu, who is on the Progressive Mass board.

Progressive Massachusetts was founded 5 years ago by grassroots organizers from the Patrick and Obama campaigns.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. JimC says

    April 12, 2017 at 4:06 pm

    Maybe you could tell us what the app is called?

  2. jconway says

    April 12, 2017 at 4:20 pm

    They already linked to it. Click and it explore! I was honored to be a beta tester for this!

    • JimC says

      April 12, 2017 at 4:39 pm

      Thanks. I was thinking it was a phone app.

  3. hesterprynne says

    April 13, 2017 at 8:53 am

    is to provide the context for the scorecard, which is largely a function of the control over the proceedings that is exerted by leadership, particularly in the House. For example, there are many more voice votes (unrecorded) than roll-call votes (recorded), and when roll-calls are taken, it’s for one of three reasons:

    1. The vote is close, and it is unclear, by voice, where the majority stands.

    2. The chamber’s leadership wants a historical record of an important vote. (the vote is popular)

    3. Members want to highlight, with an official record, differences between their positions. (the vote is contentious)

    A minor suggestion: I’d re-order these reasons, to reflect their frequency, as 2, 3, 1. Votes are most often either unanimous or along party lines. They are rarely close — leadership much prefers to know the outcome ahead of time.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.