The entire focus of Charlie Baker’s campaign from day one has been his “commitment” to (1) cutting corporate, income, and sales tax rates to 5%; so (2) the private sector can grow jobs; and (3) cut government spending. Sounds so reasonable and straightforward. And voters believe they are voting consistent with their interests/pocketbooks. What’s wrong with this simple plan?
It’s smoke and mirrors. And Charlie, again, is not being truthful.
According to today’s Globe, the Baker campaign on October 4th first reported that cutting the tax rate to 5% would be immediate, calling it their “Day 1 Tax Relief Act.” But, “pressed yesterday on the timing of his proposed cuts, Baker indicated that he would prefer to reduce taxes over the course of his term.”
Which is it Charlie–immediate tax relief, or sometime during your term? Should we just take your word for it?
Should we also trust you Charlie to make the devastating cuts to cities and towns, fire and police departments, and our schools and health care that must necessarily come with your tax cut gimmick? Or, do you plan kick the can down the road and borrow the money, like you did as the chief architect of the Big Dig financing scheme?
Charlie cannot run from his record regarding the Big Dig. And Charlie cannot compete with the Governor’s record. Notwithstanding the most difficult of economic times, under Patrick’s leadership, Massachusetts is first in the nation in job growth, first in the nation in education, and bond rating agencies have consistently affirmed Massachusetts’ “AA” rating, citing the Governor’s stewardship of the Commonwealth’s finances.
Tell the truth Charlie. The voters deserve it. The stakes are too high.
If you saw this recent ad of his, you’d know the guy is a straight shooter:
<
p>http://bit.ly/ahDk7G