Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Question about Wilkerson…

May 28, 2006 By migraine

I’m asking a question about this simply because I do not know the answer.

I consider myself savvy with campaign related important systems, like ocpf, for example.

I did a quick read through of Diane Wilkerson’s first of this year (2005) campaign finance report and what struck me was in the receipts section — there seem to be $2,950 in over-limit contributions, as in, $2,950 was given by contributors over the $500 maximum annual contribution to a campaign. Also, no reimbursements were issued by the campaign, except for about $36,000 to Diane herself.

Is there something I don’t know that allows an individual to donate over $500/calendar year? Am I misunderstanding campaign finance?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. hokun says

    May 29, 2006 at 9:05 pm

    There’s a hard $500 limit for individuals.

    <

    p>
    However, Dianne Wilkerson has a history of campaign finance problems.  OCPF actually is pretty easy to work with when you’ve accidentally taken an extra $500 and need to give it back, since everybody makes mistakes from time to time. 

    <

    p>
    However, Dianne seems to play fast and loose with these rules.  Either she chooses incompetent treasurers or she is doing something with the money.  As a Wilkerson constituent, I’d love to have a more responsive, more ethical option to vote for who could still get stuff done. 

  2. amicus says

    May 30, 2006 at 8:48 am

    Not on point to Wilkerson, but it’s interesting to note that at least one other State’s per year campaign contribution limit was ruled unconstitutional.  If anyone’s interested in the cite for the case, I’ll dig it out.  Seems that a per election cycle limit is OK, but a per year limit unfairly favors incumbents who already are in office.  Since Clean Elections was killed legislatively (thanks to the Massachusetts incumbent protection program) perhaps it’s time for a judicial attack on the status quo.  Personally, in the internet age where there can be near instant disclosure of all contributions, I favor a no limits approach with a “use it or lose it” sweep of funds into the political party accounts at the end of the cycle to keep incumbents from building war chests.  (I think Montigny holds the record now, with more than $1 million in the bank!!)  Let all candidates, including incumbents, start on equal footing each election cycle and watch how much more competitive our politics become.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.