Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Health Care: We get to keep the $385 Million (whew!)

July 26, 2006 By Charley on the MTA 5 Comments

One of the main incentives for passing the new health care law was the promise of new moneys from the feds: $385 million. This was in doubt because the law was supposed to have been implemented by July 1. It wasn’t.

Well, the feds have relented and are giving us the bucks even so. This may well result from Mitt Romney’s closeness to HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt, who weighed in on the negotiations for the new law on Mitt’s behalf. Ted Kennedy was also a major player in getting permission for the new law (the Medicaid waiver) in the first place as well. I suspect this was never really in doubt after the bill got passed, but it’s good to get confirmation anyway. We’re going to need that money.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: health-care, hhs, kennedy, leavitt, romney

Comments

  1. annem says

    July 26, 2006 at 9:31 pm

    is fundamental reform of our–I repeat OUR–health care system.  Our current system of HC financing and delivery is obscenely wasteful, largely dysfunctional and often harmful to patients and families.

    <

    p>
    The corporate market-driven structures that drive this system are being perpetuated by the recent reforms contained in the Chapter 58 “Romney-Care Individual Mandate” law.  The medicaid expansions contained in the law are good in that they will help meet urgent unmet needs, but this approach to reform is not sustainable nor is it all that sensible because it does not address the underlying causes and solutions to the crisis.

    <

    p>
    So, yes, I’ll grant you that we do need the federal money but let’s not settle for a tacit acceptance of the wasteful and dysfuntional system that we have before us.

    <

    p>
    We cannot afford, for monetary and for humanitarian reasons, not to enact a truly universal coverage and equitably financed health care system.  Uninsurance is the 3rd leading cause of death for persons aged 55 to 64 in the Commonwealth.  That’s on all of us.  (see IOM Report “Consequences of Uninsurance” and Families USA for state breakdown data).

    <

    p>
    For more details on the failings of the Chapter 58 reform law, see the Healthy Blog post on GBIO “Forward” article and read through to the comment by Alice Rothchild, MD.

    <

    p>
    Last but not least, to be part of the solution (no magic bullet but it will get us all on the right path with the legal and political tools to stay the course–yech, who do I sound like saying that?!), sign on to support the Citizens’ Health Care Amendment Campaign at http://www.HealthCar…

    Log in to Reply
  2. michael-forbes-wilcox says

    July 27, 2006 at 2:50 pm

    Charley,

    <

    p>
    I don’t pretend to know as much about our healthcare system as you and many of the other posters here do, but I can tell you something you already know: it’s broken, and the recent bill will not fix the problems.

    <

    p>
    It’s a step in the right direction (at least I hope it is, depending on how the details are worked out), but it’s only a baby step, from what I can tell.

    <

    p>
    And I think the $385 mil that the Feds have used to extort us (or is it people in Mass who have raised the ugly spectre of no Federal funds to push their vision of “reform”?) is much ado about very little.

    <

    p>
    Correct me if I’ve got the math wrong, but as I understand it the money figure represents two years of federal funding, and if you divide it by 6 million Mass residents, that works out to about $32 per person per year. Now, I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t even pay a small fraction of one month of medical insurance for me. So, I can’t imagine it’s going to do much to provide quality healthcare for all the people in this state who can’t afford insurance. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not sneezing (so to speak) at $385 million being spent on healthcare in this state. I’d just like to point out that it’s but a drop in the bucket, and probably doesn’t deserve all the hoopla it’s gotten, especially if it led us to implement policies that might end up wasting more than that.

    <

    p>
    I’m in over my head here, but my guess is that streamlining recordkeeping and other reforms would save a lot more than $385 million.

    Log in to Reply
    • stomv says

      July 27, 2006 at 3:19 pm

      after all, its Medicaid money.  Of the 6,000,000 MA residents,  about a million are served by a Medicaid program.  So, you’re looking at closer to $200 per person on Medicaid per year.

      <

      p>
      Of course, this is all mental masturbation since state budget might or might not cover the slack, making the $385 mil possibly look more like a contribution to the general coffers.

      Log in to Reply
    • charley-on-the-mta says

      July 28, 2006 at 9:37 am

      As stomv says, and if I understand correctly, the $385 million goes towards expanding MA’s health coverage through Masshealth. As far as I’m concerned, that’s one of the unqualified good things about the new health care bill. If you have health care through your employer, this money won’t affect you at all. In fact, the new law in total may not affect you much.

      <

      p>
      The issue of cost was punted on pretty hard in the new law. I’m told there will be some new proposals out later this year, many dealing with moving towards a comprehensive concept of health care, as opposed to the piecemeal (and therefore inefficient, failure-rewarding) system we have now. Stay tuned.

      Log in to Reply
  3. annem says

    July 28, 2006 at 11:57 am

    “I’m told there will be some new proposals out later this year, many dealing with moving towards a comprehensive concept of health care, as opposed to the piecemeal (and therefore inefficient, failure-rewarding) system we have now. Stay tuned.”

    <

    p>
    Please tell me if somehow I have not communicated clearly enough or if there is some other reason why you would imply, with your above comment, that the Health Care Constitutional Amendment Campaign does not exist or that it is not, as you put it “a new proposal dealing with moving towards a comprehensive concept of health care, as opposed to the piecemeal (and therefore inefficient, failure-rewarding) system we have now”.  It really pisses me off that you seem to be, along with the Boston Globe and Herald, blacklisting this proposal for fundamental health system reform.  (FYI the Glob and Herald each make millions$$$ in advertising revenue in the current market-driven HC system)

    <

    p>
    A large number of very dedicated, very smart people created this proposal over 3 years ago, starting with writing the amendment language and submitting it to the state for certicfication as a Constitutional Amendment on August 13, 2006.  We then set about building a website, a statewide campaign, and so on.  http://www.HealthCar…

    <

    p>
    Then over 70,000 registered voters signed the petitions to move it on to the legislature for 2 consecutive ConCon votes where it needs to get only 50 YES votes to then be place on the next statewide ballot for voter approval.

    <

    p>
    One health reform policy plan that would meet all the standards set forth in the amendment language is the Mass. Health Care Trust Bill, found at http://www.MassCare….

    <

    p>
    Charley, I would appreciate the favor of a reply from you about this.  Thanks.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • Great economic news today (1)
  • IRA passes 51- 50! (1)
  • Real “Center” is Economically Nationalist/Culturally Moderate (1)

Recent User Posts

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 6 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Statement by President Biden on passage of the Inflation Reduction Act

August 7, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 1 Comment

Recent Comments

  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingThe Court has just given Trump until 3 pm tomorrow to ap…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingAG Garland just announced the search warrant has been un…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingI would not be surprised at all to learn that Trump deli…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingCould it also mean that KARM-A-LAGO might want to divert…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingIt's also amusing to hear Trump supporters blame an insi…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing"President Biden victories?" You mean, the greatest achi…
  • johntmay on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentstesting 1 2 3 Testing One Two Three

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

ukdarkemily14 Emily @ukdarkemily14 ·
2h

Online for a few hours 💗
#maptwt #mnswf #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557993197229559809 Retweet on Twitter 1557993197229559809 Like on Twitter 1557993197229559809 Twitter 1557993197229559809
phoebewalkerma Phoebe Walker @phoebewalkerma ·
2h

Furious and heartbroken that MA will limp forward after the pandemic with the same broken #localpublichealth system. How is it OK to let zip code decide health protections? #mapoli https://commonwealthmagazine.org/politics/lawmakers-advocates-hit-bakers-opt-in-approach-to-public-health/

Reply on Twitter 1557991482753171460 Retweet on Twitter 1557991482753171460 Like on Twitter 1557991482753171460 Twitter 1557991482753171460
legislataapp Legislata @legislataapp ·
2h

Tweet summary for MA State House for 2022-08-11: 300 tweets from 63 legislators. Top words: law, massgovernor, massachusetts, signed, climate, energy, day, senatorbarrett, jeffroy, baker. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557986818901016577 Retweet on Twitter 1557986818901016577 Like on Twitter 1557986818901016577 Twitter 1557986818901016577
courtwatchma CourtWatchMA @courtwatchma ·
3h

Oh.

#bospoli #mapoli

Michael Avitzur @MikeAvitzurBBA

... There should be supervision over those decisions by prosecutors, though. And the 58A law should be reformed.
Final Q.: How to enhance police integrity?
Hayden: We'll hold them accountable when they do wrong. No uniform or job status will preclude us from pursuing criminality.

Reply on Twitter 1557983236483080192 Retweet on Twitter 1557983236483080192 Like on Twitter 1557983236483080192 Twitter 1557983236483080192
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
3h

Butt her e-mails
meet
Top Secret nuke documents

#mapoli

🌊Biker Phill @PhillBiker

@TheLeoTerrell Why?

Search Warrants have a process that was followed. Is Trump above the law?

Why Trump didn’t collaborate? Since January he has been warned. What is he hiding?

Why the FBI was good against Hillary but bad against Trump?

Is Trump above the law?

Reply on Twitter 1557973006550532096 Retweet on Twitter 1557973006550532096 Like on Twitter 1557973006550532096 Twitter 1557973006550532096
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
5h

This guy believed Republican officials and Fox News Hosts who said @FBI and DOJ weaponized a search warrant against @realDonaldTrump. Armed with a nail gun and an AR-15 he went to the Cincinnati FBI Field Office where he died. He believed Trump about election 2020 too #mapoli

#SeditionHunters @SeditionHunters

Ricky Shiffer, who tried to breach an FBI office in Cincinnati today at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Reply on Twitter 1557951835998126080 Retweet on Twitter 1557951835998126080 Like on Twitter 1557951835998126080 Twitter 1557951835998126080
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.