Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

$1 billion in new taxes?

By 8 Comments

Just saw that Mitt Romney came to the defense of Kerry Healey’s shellacking in last night’s debate.  He says Deval’s $1 billion figure is false.  (Deval says $1 billion of new taxes have been imposed on the Massachusetts taxpayer under Romney/Healey)

I did a little Googling, but I wasn’t able to find the figures to back up one claim over the other.  Can I get a little help?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0

Comments

  1. First he said: 

    I think its interesting to be lectured on taxes by the Lt. Gov., whose administration is responsible for $985 million of new taxes and fees.

    <

    p>
    Then later he said:

    This is an administration that talks about rolling the income tax back and is responsible at the same time for proposing $985 million in new taxes and increased fees. $1.8 billion in increases in property taxes.

    <

    p>
    Factchecking this one will take some time.

  2. a bit later:

    …your administration, Lt. Gov., has proposed $985 million in new fees and it took the legislature to say no to nearly $200 million of them.

    <

    p>
    Hard to figure out which one of the three claims to factcheck, but we at least know at least one of the 3 statements, and possibly all three, was a lie.

      • I mulled over whether to use “false” or “lie” for a few moments before deciding on lie.  My choice of “lie” was a decided choice.

        <

        p>
        Mr. Patrick’s more damaging, decided choice was uttered within seconds of the beginning of the debate when most of the audience was still watching and listening. 

        <

        p>
        It was no excited or spontaneous utterance there.  It wasn’t emotional; it was intentional and thoughtful and planned and therefore sleazy.

        <

        p>
        Then, later in the debate his statement was altered and maybe corrected for culpable deniability.

        <

        p>
        IMHO, Mr. Patrick’s first statement that the Romney administration was responsible for $985 Million of new fees and taxes was a lie.  IMHO.

    • …about pinning down any candidate on numbers like that. 

      <

      p>
      One: You know he’s talking about fees, fines, and property taxes that went up because local aid went away, and you know there’s no way anyone knows how much that is.  Romney’s a liar for calling it a lie, ’cause he doesn’t know, either.

      <

      p>
      Two:  The numbers at this stage are for effect; they get thrown around like sorority house pillows, and nobody takes them seriously.  What Patrick is using the numbers to say about the taxes “shell game” is valid.  Healy made so many outrageous claims Monday night there wouldn’t be time before the election to check them all out.  Save your factchecking chops for tracking down who’s doing the nasty push-polling that people are starting to report.  That’ll tell you all you need to know.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Archives