Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

A Message to Blue Mass Group from Congressman Jim McGovern – Patrick/Murray Can Win this November!

September 18, 2006 By congressman-jim-mcgovern

I am Congressman Jim McGovern, longtime reader, first time poster at BMG.  This is an incredible forum – I’m impressed! 

On the eve of this very important primary election, I want to share a few thoughts.

As many of you know, I was the first Congressman to endorse Deval Patrick for Governor in the Spring of 2005. I have poured my heart and soul into that campaign.  While taking nothing for granted, I am optimistic that Deval will prevail in tomorrow’s election – and will change the way we do politics in Massachusetts for the better.

But tomorrow’s election is just the beginning.  We must ensure a victory in November – and we can do that by giving our Democratic nominee for Governor the strongest running mate possible.  I have no doubt that Tim Murray is that candidate.

I want to win!  I’m sick and tired of Mitt Romney and Kerry Healey.  I’m sick and tired of the Republican agenda.  I’m sick and tired of being sick and tired!

And being from Central Massachusetts, I’m sick and tired of ceding the region to the GOP.  Four years ago Shannon O’Brien – a great candidate—lost every single city and town from 495 to Springfield – with the exception of Worcester.  If we are going to win in November, that cannot happen again!

Tim Murray will change that.  He will provide long-overdue geographic balance.

In addition, he has earned the support of mayors and local officials across the state.  They are frustrated with Republican Governors who have no clue about the challenges that face our cities and towns.  They want Tim – because, as mayor of Worcester, he knows firsthand about what they’re up against. 

Tim has an impressive record of accomplishment.  He’s turning Worcester around and he’s bringing people together.

He’s got the strong support of labor and working families throughout the state – and we will need them united and energized in November.

I’ve known Tim for many years.  He’s a treasured and loyal friend.  But my support for him is about more than friendship.  I believe in him.  He’s got compassion in his heart and steel in his spine.  He has progressive values and a record to match it.

With much genuine respect for the other candidates for Lt. Governor, I strongly believe that Tim Murray is the best candidate to help deliver a Democratic victory in November!

Jim 

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: democrats, governor, jim-mcgovern, lt.-governor, tim-murray

Comments

  1. ryepower12 says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:07 am

    I confess I’ve already voted, but it means a lot to me that you’d reach out to BMG. I think Tim is a GREAT candidate, has done a GREAT job in Worcester and I’d be honored to have him serve.

  2. wormtown says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:15 am

    If that’s not a clear message as to who Deval wants/needs as his LG running mate in November then I am not sure what is.

    <

    p>
    Patrick/Goldberg loses in Novmeber.
    Patrick/Silbert…roll the dice.
    Patrick/Murray wins in November.

    <

    p>
    Let’s keep our eyes on the prize.

    • cos says

      September 18, 2006 at 11:19 am

      Also, I doubt the LG candidate will have any effect at all on which candidate for governor wins in November.  I just don’t think people care enough to override or even dent their opinion of which ticket to vote for.

    • hoss says

      September 18, 2006 at 11:21 am

      Not sure if I’d call it that. 

      <

      p>
      But it is a strong statement. 

      <

      p>
      I think the Congressman would agree that Andrea Silbert’s experiences as a middle class mom from another portion of the state than Boston would add value to the ticket.

      • smart-sexy-&-liberal says

        September 18, 2006 at 11:29 am

        Besides, I always take offense to the assumption that women will automatically vote for another woman. Mini-Van/SUV Mom’s will vote for who they think is the best candidate – and most whom I know are voting for Mayor Murray. Maybe thats because I’m in Central MA – but I guess that shows Central, MA is going for Murray.

        <

        p> 

        • bluehoo says

          September 18, 2006 at 12:30 pm

          Why do we assume women will “vote for who they think is the best candidate” rather than simply vote for another woman, but we all assume Central MA will go for Murray simply because he lives there? I think Central MA residents will “vote for who they think is the best candidate”, too. Andrea Silbert’s experience and message are much stronger than Tim’s, much as we love him as a person. I’ll invite Tim to my barbeque, but I want Andrea in the corner office.

          • jj says

            September 18, 2006 at 5:43 pm

            Granted I do not speak on behalf of Central Mass. But you speak of Silbert’s “experience and message,” I was hoping you could elaborate as the only strong “experience and message” I have seen from her is on jobs. Whereas Tim’s experience and message cover an array of issues, and not just touch upon but actual knowledge on. If you have any doubt please visit his site and read Murray’s papers on Education, Jobs and Developement, Municiple Bill of Rights, and much much more. I have visited Silbert’s Issues page and I don’t see nearly as much experience nor as strong a message.

            <

            p>
            I am by no means saying Silbert is the worst possible choice, she is a nice person and has strong attributes. I however am saying that I don’t see how one could see her “expereince and message” as stronger than Murray’s. Murray is the best choice i you want a strong multi-issue comprehensive candidate, and I do.

            <

            p>
            ~John

      • westof495 says

        September 18, 2006 at 10:25 pm

        silbert is not a middle class mom and she brings nothing to the ticket that deval does not already bring.

  3. smart-sexy-&-liberal says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:18 am

    You are right on target. I know that we want a Democratic Victory in Novemeber against Healey/Hillman and I agree that it is important that Tim Murray is part of that Ticket. He brings not only Central MA and a strong voting base, but also has the experience in municipal government to best complement the Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate.

    <

    p>
    HURRAY, HURRAY, VOTE FOR TIM MURRAY TOMORROW!!

    • pablo says

      September 18, 2006 at 11:34 am

      Mayors and municipal officials have taken the brunt of the failings of Romney-Healey.  If Jim McGovern is sick and tired of being sick and tired, the municipal sick and tired is exponential.

      <

      p>
      Tim Murray is a beacon of hope for the sick and tired at the local level.  His presence on the ticket will energize the political operations in the cities and towns, particularly those now committed to candidates other than Deval.

      <

      p>
      Tim Murray is jet fuel for the Patrick campaign.  Why buy regular?

  4. lolorb says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:23 am

    Thank you.  My absentee ballot contains a vote for Deval and Tim.  Can’t wait for tomorrow night’s results!

    • ryepower12 says

      September 18, 2006 at 11:33 am

      I voted for Silbert =p

      <

      p>
      But I really, really like Murray and would love to have him. It was a tough, tough choice. I never even endorsed anyone on my website, because it’s essentially a coin-flip for me, albiet one that landed on Silbert. But, like I said, Murray impresses me.

      • lolorb says

        September 18, 2006 at 4:05 pm

        I had a very hard time choosing an LG candidate.  I have much respect for everyone supporting Tim (like Jim McGovern) and much respect for those who are supporting Andrea and Deb.  I chose based upon the level of activism I saw for Tim in the western part of the state.  He had people at all the caucuses.  His ground game is excellent and compliments what Deval has done from day one.  This absolutely takes nothing away from Andrea or Deb.  I liked both of them as well for different reasons.  Springfield, in particular, has been ignored by so many for too long.  In Tim, I saw someone who really understood the issues facing Worcester, Springfield and Pittsfield.  Deval will benefit from his knowledge. 

  5. sco says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:27 am

    I believe this is the first time a member of the Congressional delegation has posted even so much as a comment on BMG.  Am I forgetting someone?

    • eb3-fka-ernie-boch-iii says

      September 18, 2006 at 11:30 am

      Barney Frank here.

      • bob-neer says

        September 18, 2006 at 11:43 am

        Some of the comments on the Cheney-Healey post were from him, I think.

      • stomv says

        September 18, 2006 at 12:28 pm

        you’re nowhere near funny enough to claim to be Barney Frank.  Plus, you don’t type with a lisp.

        <

        p>

        • gary says

          September 18, 2006 at 12:37 pm

          He professes no interest in getting behind Deval

        • eb3-fka-ernie-boch-iii says

          September 18, 2006 at 2:32 pm

          this. stoRmv

    • david says

      September 18, 2006 at 2:55 pm

  6. eb3-fka-ernie-boch-iii says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:30 am

    A+ 
    Great Thinking to put this here, Congressman.  Murray makes it a lot easier for the Dem nominess then does Deb Silbert

  7. danielh says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:31 am

    I agree that it is most beneficial to Massachusetts to have our elected officials looking out for all of the constitutents, and not just east of 495. Additonally, I believe Tim has the most experience in politics and can bring this knowledge of how the system works in order to make it work for us all. Finally, I would like to see more control and resources turned over to the local ecomony, as I believe the local community knows what is best for its citizens.

  8. rollbiz says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:33 am

    Just when I think Jim McGovern couldn’t be any cooler, he shows up at BMG… Nice post, Congressman! I’ve been supporting a Patrick/Murray ticket since before it was a cool thing, and you’ve been supporting it even longer than I have…I know I’ve told you in person, but I’ll say it again: Thank you so much! I didn’t know it was possible to be as proud of politicians as I am of you and Ed Augustus. Hopefully, come tomorrow/November I will have two more politicians I can be that proud of.

    • rollbiz says

      September 18, 2006 at 11:35 am

      I meant state/federal politicians. I’m already very proud of Tim as my mayor.

  9. bob-neer says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:51 am

    Thanks for the post Congressman. Wonderful to have you. I wonder, however, whether endorsements from local elected officials are likely to help or hurt candidates this year. The mood of the electorate in Massachusetts, in the wake of the CA/Tastrophe and the disgraceful, symptomatic, behavior of Royal Democratic Chickens like Galvin and Lynch, is hardly rip roaring in support of the Democratic Party Establishment. In fact, I think Patrick’s outsider status is a big part of his appeal. Silbert, whom Charley and I support, has the same kind of maverick Fresh Ideas attractiveness. We’ll know tomorrow.

  10. alexwill says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:53 am

    Thanks for posting! I’m a big fan, the town grew-up in (Upton) was in your disctrict for many years: though I never got a chance to vote for you for the 3rd district, I wrote you in for US Senate in 02 and 2nd House district in 04 🙂

    <

    p>
    I’ve been a Silbert supporter for a long time now, and I will be holding a sign for her tomorrow, but lately I’m seriously considering a strategic vote for Tim Murray. He’s always been a strong alternate choice, I’m worried about a Goldberg win, as fear her campaign has a lot of the faults like the ones Reilly and Galvin have shown, and could break once it gets to higher level.

    <

    p>
    So, as very much a surprise to myself, I’m going in undecided on LG tomorrow, which I find crazy at this point. I’m still leaning Silbert, though I want to see what the Suffolk poll says today on that race…. I hate the concept of strategic voting and spoiler issues but I think I’m starting to get why people make such a big deal of it. Oh for IRV!

    • pablo says

      September 18, 2006 at 12:29 pm

      It’s going to be a difficult general election.  Jim McGovern is right.  We are going to win or lose this race in central Massachusetts.  Deb Goldberg will be a drag on the ticket, and Tim Murray will bring strength just where we need it most.

      <

      p>
      HURRY HURRY
      for Patrick and Murray!

      • alexwill says

        September 18, 2006 at 12:38 pm

        I’m gonna have to take your comment with a big grain of salt as I know you’ve been very anti-Silbert over charter schools in the past. But thanks 🙂

        • pablo says

          September 18, 2006 at 2:18 pm

          … but Andrea Silbert’s charter school position,  and her lack of interest in cities and towns, is a problem for energizing mayors and municipal officials.  Andrea has said that cities and towns have 200 legislators to look out for their interests, and she’s about jobs.  That may be so, but that message won’t play with a mayor.

          <

          p>
          She would, however, be a good choice for a cabinet position pertaining to economic development.

    • cos says

      September 18, 2006 at 1:03 pm

      The polls still show “undecided” leads all three LG candidates.  Those undecided voters may be very decided on their choice for Governor, so they’ll vote just as likely as the decided ones, but who for?  This race is wide open.

      <

      p>
      Further, hoss’ poll analysis shows that Goldberg’s support is weaker than it seems, and that among Deval Patrick supporters, Silbert is actually in the lead, with Murray second and Goldberg far behind.  If turnout is low and Deval’s field operation – the strongest one out there – is responsible for a good percentage of the vote, that makes it a Silbert vs. Murray race.  On the other hand, hoss also showed that among the casual voters who aren’t as motivated to vote, Silbert and Murray are also way ahead of Goldberg, so if turnout is high, it’s also a Silbert vs. Murray race.

      <

      p>
      Too confusing to figure out the right “strategic” vote?  Exactly.  Just remember that undecided is in the lead, and vote for your favorite candidate.

      <

      p>
      I recommend Andrea Silbert, whose charisma and boldness are more likely to help our ticket in November – not that I think the LG nominee will have much impact on the November vote anyway.

      • alexwill says

        September 18, 2006 at 2:26 pm

        If the last poll showed a significant lead, I was thinking of considering a switch, but with these numbers:

        <

        p>

        41 Undecided
        20 Goldberg
        20 Murray
        17 Silbert
        3 Refused

        <

        p>
        I’m gonna stick with voting for who I think is the best for the job.

    • smart-sexy-&-liberal says

      September 18, 2006 at 9:09 pm

      Personally, I think all the candidates have proven themselves in one way or another. But, as I have said in the past Mayor Murray is the best all-around candidate and will TRULY help the Democratic Ticket win in November.

      <

      p>
      I hope that you will vote for him tomorrow.

  11. davemb says

    September 18, 2006 at 11:56 am

    in a well-produced, well-written briefer version with the Congressman’s voice.

    <

    p>
    I’m voting for Murray tomorrow — I started predisposed in his favor when he was the only LG candidate who had representatives at the Amherst town caucus to select delegates for the convention.  Silbert also looks like an excellent candidate (and has the backing of most of the Dem activists I know in Amherst), but I go along with the arguments that Murray balances the ticket nicely, adds (a small amount of) electoral strength, and would make a good governor if necessary.

  12. jlove1982 says

    September 18, 2006 at 12:03 pm

    and I did vote for Patrick/Murray…  I’ve been impressed with McGovern since I first saw him speak at Wheaton in 2004, and I’m still impressed now.  Also, as a Westie turned Eastie, I know all too well that the part of the state I have lived most of my life in does feel a little left out at times, so the more we bring everyone in, the better.

  13. freshayer says

    September 18, 2006 at 12:43 pm

    All due respect to the Congressman but the bumper sticker poll, as informal as it ever gets always had the Deval Patrick  Andrea Silbert spin to it and has for a long long time. Flooding a Blog with fox hole conversion’s is hardly Murray on a role. Deval’s surge is the wave the Murraryites are trying to catch up to that we devotees of Silbert caught when it was still a quite rumble on the horizon.

  14. smitty7764 says

    September 18, 2006 at 2:42 pm

    First I would like to thank Jim McGovern for being such a true leader in this part of the state. I would of never thought a Patrick/Murray ticket would be possible but on the eve of the pimary it seems like it very well could be the outcome. It wouldn’t be the first time the congressman was right. Since Tim kicked the campaign off in December there has been steady support for the Worcester native. His base has grown larger and larger for various reasons one being his accomplishements as mayor of the second largest city in Mass. He enhances the ticket in ways the other two candidates can’t, and that is why we must work hard tommorow, nd into Novemeber ensuring a Democratic victory. Part of garnishing that victory is Making as strong a ticket possible and I believe the Dems in this state are ready to do that.

  15. jumpster says

    September 18, 2006 at 2:48 pm

    Congressman McGovern makes the case for Andrea Silbert simply because he can’t state the obvious – he’s supporting Murray b/c Murray was there for him when he ran for Congress in 1996.  To not support Murray, who will still be City Councilor in Chief if he loses, would create political headaches for McGovern and on top of that, he owes Murray for previous support.  There’s nothing wrong with that, but that’s what makes career politicians career politicians and creates this culture of endorsements pretty useless as barometers of real support.  I endorse you, you endorse me.  Wash, rinse and repeat every election cycle. 

    <

    p>
    Goldberg’s political support comes from politicians who she supported as a politician.  When she’s looking for a new seat, she calls those chits in.  Murray’s done the same thing.  Silbert, as a first time candidate with tremendous, yet unique, public service experience is beholden to no one.  She hasn’t garnered tons of institutional support, but it hasn’t mattered.  She’s raised the money, done well at the convention and risen in the polls (see WHDH today).

    <

    p>
    B/c elected officials and institutions like unions fear change more than anything, most cannot even fathom supporting a first time candidate unless the candidate is filthy rich.  They’re not going to be courageous, even if a candidate is strong on jobs like Andrea and has had a real bottom line effect like Andrea did because of the Center for Women and Enterprise, they’re going to protect their own.

    <

    p>
    It’s exactly why Andrea Silbert is such a great candidate against a Healey ticket, she cannot be derided as part of the insider democratic machinery, yet she can attack them on issues she excels on, issues important to the middle class and job creation. 

    <

    p>
    Andrea has accomplished much and as of today’s WHDH poll, she’s in a three way tie.  She’s done it without Tim’s connections or Debby’s dough and that’s very impressive. 

    <

    p>
    I’m just a voter, not a congressman, but to me Andrea Silbert is the right choice for Lt. Governor.

    • leftisright says

      September 18, 2006 at 4:54 pm

      her endorsements?

      • hoss says

        September 18, 2006 at 5:07 pm

        It was her resume, her record of success in creating jobs and her vision for the state.  No one owed her anything, no one expected anything from her.  While her opponents have good ideas and track records, the reasons for the endorsements they’ve received are necessarily slightly diminished because of their positions.  Not a slight on them of their abilities, just a result of being a politician.

        • leftisright says

          September 18, 2006 at 5:16 pm

          you’re telling us that she didn’t support, donate money, work for or endorse any of those who endorsed her but she did raise 750 k for Kerry???
          Ok

          • hoss says

            September 18, 2006 at 10:46 pm

            Did Kerry endorse her?  No.  Did Mayors (who have lost more political juice in this state than just about anyone)?  No, save a couple.

            <

            p>
            Hacks like hack, innovators like innovators.

            <

            p>
            This primary is about sweeping change.  Deval or Chris will bring that, and Andrea Silbert will be right there with them.  People are sick of politicians, they want a new kind of politics, not the same old back-scratching, hi-how-are-ya insider B.S. that Murray and Goldberg are about.

            <

            p>
            You want change, you’ll get it tomorrow.

            • leftisright says

              September 19, 2006 at 6:23 am

            • churchofbruce says

              September 19, 2006 at 10:43 am

              Maybe in pure politics, but not in getting things done–they’ve been running up against the Wall in the state house and the governor’s mansion for quite a while. Take it from a resident of the flooded..I mean Great City of Peabody. I think Mayor Mike Bonfanti has a permanent indentation in his forehead–from banging it against the State House door.

              <

              p>
              Quite honestly, though I find Silbert impressive, and deciding between her and Murray was tough, the reason I finally decided on Murray is because he’s been a mayor. LG isn’t much more than a voice in the Governor’s ear–if that–but I’d rather have that voice be someone who understands that our municipalities have been crapped on for some time now.

      • jumpster says

        September 19, 2006 at 1:19 pm

        She won endorsements the hard way, by earning them.  There are still some pols with guts to choose first time candidates who aren’t rich, just not many.

  16. pablo says

    September 18, 2006 at 3:12 pm

    According to a press release on the Reilly website:

    <

    p>

    Citing his proven record of partnership with cities and towns and calling him the best candidate to “get Massachusetts moving again,” fifteen mayors from across the Commonwealth today endorsed Attorney General Tom Reilly for Governor. This unmatched show of support doubles the mayoral support received by any other candidate.

    The endorsement event, held at Medford City Hall, was attended by:
    North Adams Mayor John Barrett,
    Medford Mayor Michael McGlynn,
    Fall River Mayor and President of the Mass. Mayor’s Association Ed Lambert,
    Everett Mayor John Hanlon,
    Lynn Mayor Chip Clancy,
    Malden Mayor Richard Howard,
    Melrose Mayor Robert Dolan, and
    Westfield Mayor Richard Sullivan.

    Also endorsing Reilly, though not at the event, were
    Boston Mayor Tom Menino,
    Agawam Mayor Richard Cohen,
    Chicopee Mayor Michael Bissonnette,
    Holyoke Mayor Michael Sullivan,
    Methuen Mayor William Manzi,
    Newton Mayor David Cohen,
    Westfield Mayor Richard Sullivan, and
    Weymouth Mayor David Madden.

    <

    p>
    To win the election, you need to energize these guys.  They need to believe, deep in their hearts, that electing a Democratic governor will make a difference for their cities.  Stirring their passion is the difference between a lukewarm press release endorsing the ticket and an all-out effort. 

    <

    p>
    Tim Murray is that energy.

  17. jumpster says

    September 18, 2006 at 3:18 pm

    You don’t need to energize these guys, you need to stay the hell away from them because they endorsed Reilly.  I mean, if they’re that out of touch…

    • rollbiz says

      September 18, 2006 at 4:02 pm

      If you want to flip the proverbial bird to a dozen plus mayors just because they backed Reilly, I hope your candidates of choice are smarter than you.

  18. squegro says

    September 18, 2006 at 3:27 pm

    Jumpster – you obviously know very little about Jim McGovern and the weight and creditability that his post here brings. If you’re theory is true:

    <

    p>
    “B/c elected officials…fear change more than anything, most cannot even fathom supporting a first time candidate unless the candidate is filthy rich…”

    <

    p>
    …then why did McGovern come out and back Deval Patrick 18 MONTHS AGO? Jim McGovern is backing Tim Murray becasue he believes he is the best LG candidate – bottom story.

    • benb says

      September 18, 2006 at 11:48 pm

      McGovern is re-paying Murray for past support.  Nothing wrong with that; it’s called politics.

  19. herakles says

    September 18, 2006 at 6:25 pm

    What agenda?  It is my understanding that Beacon Hill has been run by Senate Pres and the Speaker for a long time.  Romney, Swift and Cellucci all amounted to nothing.  I’m sick of the Republicans as well but little will change with a Democrat in the office.

    <

    p>
    The Republicans have wanted to reduce the state income tax to 5% for a long time and they have been unsuccessful.  They haven’t been able to reduce the 12% capital gains tax.  They only get what the legislature gives them.  They have had their vetoes consistently overridden.  They have had no gravity at all.

    • pablo says

      September 18, 2006 at 7:15 pm

      For the past sixteen years, our executive branch has been in the hands of the Republicans.  Republican appointees, some VERY conservative, have been writing our state regulations.  The state Board of Education, for example, has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Pioneer Institute.  We can’t get rid of these conservative ideologues unless we change governors.

      <

      p>
      You can do considerable damage, even without any (obvious) support in the legislature.

      • lynne says

        September 18, 2006 at 9:35 pm

        Who do you think does oversight on the Big Dig, Herakles? Republican governor appointees – hacks, the lot of them, except way back to the first one. None of them actually know engineering or project management. Look at the damage THAT caused.

  20. lynne says

    September 18, 2006 at 9:40 pm

    A comment left on my blog was in Jim McGovern’s name,coping his post from here. I’d like to know if Rep. McGovern posted it or did someone copy and paste it in his name without his permission? If the latter, I really am somewhat unhappy about that…if the Congressman did it himself, I’m flattered he thought of putting his commentary on my blog as well, I just doubt he did…doesn’t seem as likely.

    <

    p>
    If someone discovers someone posted in his name (I don’t have a problem with an unaffiliated commenter quoting him, just using his name to actually post) please let me know.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.