Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Shonda-Gate!

September 26, 2006 By Charley on the MTA

Last night Fox25 had the absolute idiotic gall to dial up a couple of celebrities — chef Jasper White and Red Sox wife Shonda Schilling — and have them ask questions on behalf of, you know, the rest of us who don’t make lots and lots and lots of money. Bad enough as it is to pass these people off as Joe or Jane Voter.

But now Adam Reilly tells us Shonda’s not a voter of any sort in Massachusetts. She ain’t registered. Can’t do anything in November.

Good work, Fox 25. Let us know if you actually find a voter next time.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: debates, fox25, shonda-schilling

Comments

  1. since1792 says

    September 26, 2006 at 2:29 pm

    isn’t that the cutoff to register to vote?

    <

    p>
    still a bad move on FOX’s end to not check that…

    • petr says

      September 26, 2006 at 2:38 pm

      I don’t know if she, and/or Curt, is a full time resident… Most pros have at least two houses: Paul Pierce, for example, lives in LA in the offseason. Jason Varitek lives in Georgia…  She may not be eligible to register. Worth looking into.

      <

      p>
      In any event, if ever I meet Curt Schilling in person, I’m gonna tell him that I’m pitching next time he’s on the rotation… Hey, if he can stick his nose in politics without being asked, I can certainly pitch for the Sox! (results, in both instances, sure to be disastrous… =-)

      • fieldscornerguy says

        September 26, 2006 at 3:01 pm

        To be fair, in a democracy, everyone is entitled to–and encouraged to have–political views.  The way that celebrity gives some people an extra platform for their politics is absurd, but if we complain about it for Curt Schilling (whose politics I find repulsive), then we aren’t in much position to get excited when Moby or Bruce Springsteen endorses John Kerry.

        • pmegan says

          September 26, 2006 at 3:23 pm

          Moby or Bruce Springsteen aren’t being posited as Massachusetts voters, though.  I didn’t see Shonda’s question (Fox apparently realize that some of us go to a magical place called “work” and don’t get home by 6pm) but I assume it was heavily implied, if not directly said, that she has a personal investment in this matter.

          <

          p>
          My first thought when I heard about it was “how does she care?  as though her kids go to public school!” but it’s great that’s not even the primary issue now!

          • bluetooth says

            September 26, 2006 at 3:33 pm

            • pmegan says

              September 26, 2006 at 3:36 pm

              That is interesting to hear.  I actually would have thought otherwise not even so much for income reasons, but just because private schools usually are much more flexible about their students travelling a lot, and obviously with his job he has the opportunity to have his kids travel a lot too.

            • nopolitician says

              September 26, 2006 at 4:58 pm

              their kids actually do go to public school.

              <

              p>
              Yes, but in fairness, when the public school system is in a town where the average house price is $600k, and when there are  plenty of million dollar homes, how does this really differ from a private school?

              <

              p>
              I’m sure there aren’t a lot kids whose parents earn the minimum wage going to school with Curt’s kids.

              <

              p>
              In the past twenty-five years, I’ve seen the public schools in this state become “general public” and “pseudo private”.

          • fieldscornerguy says

            September 26, 2006 at 3:42 pm

            I fully agree that having Schilling–or Jasper White, or any celeb–ask questions as an “average voter” was absurd, and probably a bizarre grab for ratings and buzz by Fox.  I was resonding to Petr’s comment that if Curt Schilling was allowed to talk about politics, then he should be allowed to pitch for the Red Sox.  Schilling doesn’t need anyone’s permission to talk about politics, though I cringe whenever he does.

            <

            p>
            Around the 2004 election, there was some graffiti in Harvarde Square that read, “Schilling is a two-faced prick traitor.”  I chuckled.

            • centralmassdad says

              September 26, 2006 at 3:56 pm

              I suppose that you also chuckled when Rumsfeld used that epithet to describe non-supporters of the Iraq war?

              • fieldscornerguy says

                September 27, 2006 at 2:22 am

                If don Rumsfeld wants to callme a prick or a traitor, he’s welcome to.  And I’m not sure what your subject heading is supposed to mean, but if you think I’m a prick or a traitor, whatever.

                <

                p>
                I was amused to see that others shared my dislike for Schilling’s politics.  i don’t expect graffiti to be particularly polite or demure.

  2. eb3-fka-ernie-boch-iii says

    September 26, 2006 at 3:17 pm

    and the “New Boston”.  It’s all about getting your name in the Inside Track.

  3. since1792 says

    September 26, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    Jim Brodie on 96.9 Talk did a check and Curt is registered in Medfield as an unenrolled voter – so maybe he’s voting in two places? đŸ™‚

    • shillelaghlaw says

      September 26, 2006 at 3:30 pm

  4. centralmassdad says

    September 26, 2006 at 4:05 pm

    Sheesh, this post ranks pretty high on the pointless whine-o-meter.  Wasn’t there a rumor of a push poll at which to be outraged?

    <

    p>
    Its not like she asked a particularly loaded question: “Why, Mr. Patrick, do you support the firing of white teachers?”

    <

    p>
    Sounds like she asked a simple question on merit pay for teachers that illustrated that Healy is for it and Patrick is for it, but not really.

    <

    p>
    Difference highlighted; function of debate fulfilled.

    • herakles says

      September 26, 2006 at 5:34 pm

      making too much sense.  You are too level-headed and unbiased.  Haven’t you been drinking your KoolAid?

    • charley-on-the-mta says

      September 26, 2006 at 5:39 pm

      No problem with that. The idea of having celebrities ask questions on behalf of the voters is insulting.

      <

      p>
      And if the post is pointless, isn’t complaining about the content of the post doubly so? đŸ˜‰

      • centralmassdad says

        September 27, 2006 at 3:51 pm

        The manufactured outrage on this particular non-issue is almost self-parody; the posters are reacting like the “Are you oppressing me?” guy from The Holy Grail. And all this after their guy came out of the debate looking pretty good.

        <

        p>
        Yes, my post was an over-reaction, but its stems from frustration with the tendency of some to rush to feel politically victimized, all the time.  The same tendency by the “That’s anti-Christian!” people on the right is equally irritating.

        <

        p>
        We didn’t lose an un-losable election by running a poor campaign (or having a poor candidate); the election was stolen, and that series of negative ads that went undefended just wasn’t fair. 

        <

        p>
        Whiny is not an appropriate posture for a winning political movement. 

        <

        p>
        And it was an anonymous comment on an internet message board.  Can’t get much more pointless than that.

        <

        p>

    • tom-m says

      September 26, 2006 at 10:34 pm

      I think you are completely missing the point.

      <

      p>
      The questions were to be asked by “Average voters” and they were referred to by Chris Wallace as “regular people.  Of the four, two of the “regular people” were actually Republican celebrities, a third a “regular” Republican and the fourth is not listed as a registered voter.

      <

      p>
      Of the two celebrities, one is not registered to vote in Massachusetts and the other is a maximum contributor to the Republican candidate.

      <

      p>
      To me, that’s not “pointless” whining.  That raises legitimate ethics concerns about the media outlet hosting this event.

      • centralmassdad says

        September 27, 2006 at 7:17 am

        The DP Devout need something about which to feel victimized.

        • shiltone says

          September 27, 2006 at 9:18 am

          I hope it’s the same when you post on the Republican national congressional committee web site.

          • centralmassdad says

            September 27, 2006 at 10:24 am

            only more so.

        • hooks99 says

          September 27, 2006 at 10:01 am

          We should ALL feel victimized.  Regardless of whether its Shonda Schilling or Ben Affleck asking the question, the entire notion of needing celebrities to address issues that are germane to the citizens of Massachusetts reeks of condescension.  It says that we either a) can’t formulate questions and opinions on our own or b) need a talking head to hold our attention.

          <

          p>
          If you can’t acknowledge this simple truth, you are either a WFXT shareholder or simply ignorant of the facts.

  5. pablo says

    September 26, 2006 at 5:48 pm

    …the outrage was to have a fishy celeb who is maxed out to Kerry Healey lob her a softball.  {see diary http://www.bluemassg…]

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.