Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

“Ten Steps to a Liberal America” with Bill Scher

September 21, 2006 By shai-sachs

Join us as we discuss Bill Scher’s new book on revitalizing liberal politics.  Come prepared with lots of questions!

Thursday, Sept. 28

7 – 8:30 pm

USES Harriet Tubman House, 566 Columbus Avenue, Boston

Directions: http://www.uses.org/directions.htm

RSVP: http://www.upcoming.org/event/109795

Buy the book at the event, or online at http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-1594863962-0

Bill Scher has been writing smart, sharp political commentary on his popular blog, Liberal Oasis, for several years.  Now, he’s got a bold, pragmatic plan to revitalize liberal politics in America.  His book contains plenty of practical advice on how to:

– defuse the right-wing culture war

– communicate directly with the news media and encourage them to cover underreported stories

– protest in a way that reaches those outside the ranks of activist organizations

– join the growing online liberal community to effectively exert pressure on the political establishment

– embrace the term liberal as often and as openly as possible

Come prepared with lots of questions!  We’ll have a question and answer session after Bill’s reading.

Co-sponsored by Blue Mass Group, Cambridge Drinking Liberally, Boston Drinking Liberally, Cambridge DFA, Boston DFA, and the Harvard Bookstore.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bill-scher, books, drinking-liberally

Comments

  1. lynne says

    September 21, 2006 at 1:36 pm

    Do you guys ever SLEEP?

    <

    p>
    By the way, what about the famed Unity Party?

    • shai-sachs says

      September 21, 2006 at 3:15 pm

      that’s like when you’re not at the bar, right?

    • shai-sachs says

      September 21, 2006 at 3:22 pm

      not too sure what happened with that… DL is officially non-partisan, so, speaking with my DL hat on, we can’t host a Democratic Unity Party.  maybe we can hustle together some DFA groups for it, though.

    • david says

      September 21, 2006 at 8:35 pm

      7:30 at Tingle’s on Monday night (debate runs 6-7).  There’s a post up about it.

      <

      p>
      See you there! 

    • susan-m says

      September 28, 2006 at 5:02 pm

      another opportunity for you to ignore me.

      <

      p>
      That’s why you’re On Notice!

  2. gary says

    September 21, 2006 at 1:53 pm

    A new slogan. I like it! I think Mr. Patrick should run with it.

    <

    p>

    – embrace the term liberal as often and as openly as possible.

    • shai-sachs says

      September 21, 2006 at 3:17 pm

      one of the reasons i’m happy to have bill scher visit us is exactly that – i’m tired of hearing people who are afraid to use the word liberal, or who think it’s a dirty term.  i still hear it these days, even from fellow activists.  it’s a republican tactic, and we need to cut it out.

      • centralmassdad says

        September 21, 2006 at 5:02 pm

        nm

        • cos says

          September 28, 2006 at 5:21 pm

          They don’t mean exactly the same thing, but they’re also not mutually exclusive, and I’m happy to use both.  I prefer candidates who are both progressive and liberal, and if they say so, that’s great.  In a lot of the Democratic primaries and municipal elections we’ve been contesting around here recently, all or most candidates are “liberal” so the distinction is in looking for the best progressive.  But when it comes to electing our governor, Kerry Healey is clearly much less liberal than Deval Patrick (or Grace Ross).

          <

          p>
          One way to illustrate the distinction: In the 2003/2004 Democratic contest for the presidential nomination, Dennis Kucinich was the most liberal, and Howard Dean was the most progressive.  In the 2005 state senate special election, both Mackey and Jehlen were about equally liberal, but Jehlen was more progressive.

          • david says

            September 28, 2006 at 8:03 pm

            I’ve been dying to know!

          • alexwill says

            September 28, 2006 at 8:09 pm

            In the 2003/2004 Democratic contest for the presidential nomination, Dennis Kucinich was the most liberal, and Howard Dean was the most progressive.

            <

            p>
            I would agree except exactly the opposite way đŸ™‚

            • cos says

              September 29, 2006 at 2:23 am

              You think Howard Dean was more liberal than Dennis Kucinich????

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.