Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

New poll! State House News has Patrick up 24%

November 6, 2006 By David

A poll released by State House News Service yesterday (summary, data) has Deval Patrick winning 51% of the vote, compared to Kerry Healey’s 27%.  Christy Mihos got 8%, Grace Ross got 2%, and 5% remain undecided.  The poll of 358 registered voters, 95% of whom said they definitely or probably would vote tomorrow, has a margin of error is 5%, and was taken Nov. 1-2. 

Interestingly, the poll asked what would happen if Mitt Romney instead of Kerry Healey were the Republican candidate.  Result: Patrick 50%, Romney 29%.  Sorry, Howie — no dice there.

One day left to turn Nov. 7 into a truly history-making event.  Do everything you can to make it happen.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: governor, kerry-muffy-healey, massachusetts, patrick, vote-11.7.2006

Comments

  1. hoyapaul says

    November 6, 2006 at 10:15 am

    My original prediction was 50% for Patrick and 38% for Healey. This is probably too conservative, given that I don’t believe Healey has broken 34% in any poll since the primaries, and this is about the 100th indy poll showing Deval with a 20-something lead.

    <

    p>
    It’s certainly not over yet, and I plan to hold signs and do other stuff for Patrick on Tuesday. I’ll probably make a stop over to RI to help out Whitehouse as well.

    <

    p>
    Good luck to all tomorrow, and good work!

  2. rollbiz says

    November 6, 2006 at 10:36 am

    Not to defend the guy, but if he had actually run for re-election here I think you would have seen a very different result. Remember, this poll is essentially who would vote for Romney after he left us behind. It’s also who would vote for Romney based on a vicious campaign run by Healey.

  3. benny says

    November 6, 2006 at 10:37 am

    Good to see no sign of slippage, tomorrow will be a big day.

    <

    p>
    On the Mitt thing – I hate the guy, and these results are interesting but have to be taken with a boulder of salt – if he had not abandoned us for the national stage and was wooing this state for re-election with his 100% attention and (phony but still effective) charm, he would be extremely competitive… 

    • peter-porcupine says

      November 6, 2006 at 10:52 am

      • david says

        November 6, 2006 at 11:05 am

        that if Dukakis did it, it’s OK?  Not exactly the tune that Healey & Co. have been whistling of late.

        • peter-porcupine says

          November 6, 2006 at 11:18 am

          No matter WHAT the AFL-CIO radio commercial says, he’s still here and didn’t ‘leave the state’.

          <

          p>
          Duke, on the other hand, refused to let poor Evelyn Murphy even have the keys to the Corner Office, and ran around the country WHILE STILL A SITTING GOVERNOR.  He ran for reelection KNOWING he’d spend the last two years doing so.

          <

          p>
          Mitt didn’t – because he wanted to earn the paycheck he doesn’t take.  Unlike the Duke.

          • tblade says

            November 6, 2006 at 12:40 pm

            Was Bush not sitting Governor of Texas in 2000? Bush and Dukakis, however, seemed very proud of their respective home states.

            • peter-porcupine says

              November 6, 2006 at 1:14 pm

              While Mitt is an anomaly.

              <

              p>
              Do you have any IDEA how often he has to refute the idea he’s a wild eyed liberal, just BECAUSE he’s from Mass., when he’s in, say, Oklahoma?

      • trickle-up says

        November 6, 2006 at 11:22 am

        going about making Massachusetts the butt of all his jokes. (For that matter: What jokes? But seriously….)

        <

        p>
        That’s what people–not just partisan Democrats like us–are so frosted about.

        • peter-porcupine says

          November 6, 2006 at 11:38 am

          ..about how Duke was a living, breathing joke out on the campaign trail.  I would just suggest you think about the tank.

          • trickle-up says

            November 6, 2006 at 1:52 pm

            As I recall, when asked (about then-candidate Dukakis), “What’s the funniest thing he ever did?” George answered, “He’s doing it.”

            <

            p>
            I try very hard not to think about the tank, thank you very much!

      • 25-cats says

        November 6, 2006 at 12:56 pm

        When Dukakis ran in 1988, the state was heading toward a fiscal crisis, but the state government covered it up that year so that Dukakis could continue his campaign theme of “the Massachusetts Miracle.”  Most people were furious in 1989 (I was here.) and the result was a governor race in 1990 betweeen a Republican (Weld) and a reactionary Democrat (Silber).

        <

        p>
        So in general, yes, running for higher office leads to some form of neglect of the current office.  We’d have been better off if Dukakis hadn’t run for reelection in 1986, and we’d have been better off of Romney had done his damn job for the last two years and started really running for president in 2007.

      • wasteful-inefficient-and-unnecessary says

        November 6, 2006 at 3:51 pm

        Presidential primaries are not being held – and Romney, at the moment, has not declared himself a candidate for President.  Dukakis was a candidate for President and he was campaigning for himself.  Romney is campaigning for others. Most importantly, Dukakis never intentionally insulted Massachusetts when he was out of the state. Romney does so almost every time he appears.  Additionally, even when he isn’t campaigning elsewhere, Romney’s attendance record is abysmal – as is Healey. Galvin has been in charge more than anybody ever realizes. 

  4. fredct says

    November 6, 2006 at 4:09 pm

    Has Deval up by 29%, but it looks like they may not have included Mihos or Ross.

    <

    p>
    http://www.pollster….

    <

    p>
    Of note is they also have Lieberman by only 4. That’s the closest anyone has shown it. They have Va and Mo dead tied at 50/50, Cardin by 6 in Md, and, surprisingly, did not do Mt or RI.

    <

    p>
    Clearly pollsters are having trouble getting a handle on the Ct Senate race.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.