So I generally wouldn’t comment on a Dem primary feud, especially one that has seemed so overplayed already as the Geffen v Clinton v Obama v some other guy mini drama. But something new has surfaced and parts of this seem too remarkable to ignore.
Check out: http://blogs.suntime…
OK, so they competed to woo a consultant and Clinton got him for $10K/mo. Possible problems may include:
– the guy is a state senator in SC
– and a pastor of a megachurch
– and endorsed Clinton without disclosing the contract
Is all of this quite legal? If he uses his pastoral influence to deliver votes? Any conflict of interest with his state senate position? Yikes, I don’t like the look of this at all.
Please share widely!
