Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Democrats as Television Characters

July 5, 2007 By kbusch 27 Comments

In the arena of personality, Paul Krugman gets closer to the truth in his June 8 column, “Lies, Sighs And Politics” where he points out that the policy positions of candidates are a better view into their characters than the theater criticism that passes for campaign coverage. Bush was deceptive early and often with his tax cut proposals — a prelude to his later and larger deceptions on Iraq. Had the media focused on that policy issue, the public would have had a better view of Bush’s personality than the contrived masculinity with which he regaled us.

It is not enough anymore for Democrats to be right on the issues. If the media are stuck on the narrative of effete gender-bending Democrats versus nice-smelling, fight-winning manly Republicans, we Democrats are accepting a handicap difficult to overcome.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. bob-neer says

    July 5, 2007 at 2:42 pm

    54.1% of adult population, and almost two-thirds on Sunday, according to the Newspaper Association of America. Is that “few?”

    Log in to Reply
    • sco says

      July 5, 2007 at 3:36 pm

      The stats you point to seem to suggest that it is indeed “few” when compared to the numbers thirty years ago.

      <

      p>
      I would suggest also that included in that 54% are exclusive readers of tabloid rags like Star, the Enquirer and the Weekly World News.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but I would wager that the amount of people that are getting current events rather than celebrity gossip from newsppers is less than that 54%.

      Log in to Reply
      • mcrd says

        July 8, 2007 at 10:36 am

        It’s amazing how progressive documentaion is spot on accurate, and everyone else’s is contrived, supposition,
        innuendo, doctored or plain ole BS.

        <

        p>
        Fascinating.

        Log in to Reply
    • tom-m says

      July 5, 2007 at 4:05 pm

      I have plenty of friends who start with the Sports section and work their way towards Sudoku, but couldn’t tell the difference between Scooter Libby and Libby Dole if you spotted them the S-c-o-o-t.  Are they among the 54.1%?

      Log in to Reply
    • raj says

      July 5, 2007 at 4:24 pm

      …have you actually read newspapers from other parts of the country?  I have, and in even large markets such as San Francisco, they are almost invariably brain-dead.  God help the people who are reading newspapers in Cincinnati or Ft. Myers FL. 

      <

      p>
      Even the Washington Post and NYTimes are questionable–lots of words, little content having anything to do with reality.

      Log in to Reply
      • mcrd says

        July 8, 2007 at 10:38 am

        I mean, there is an accurate source of observation.

        Log in to Reply
        • raj says

          July 8, 2007 at 12:20 pm

          Unlike the purported journalists on the Faux News Channel.  Or those on Boston’s Fox 25 News, for that matter.

          Log in to Reply
    • kbusch says

      July 5, 2007 at 9:33 pm

      Concurring with sco, Wookie, and raj, the problem is that for a smaller and smaller portion of Americans is the newspaper a source of, well, news. Americans watch an enormous amount of television.

      <

      p>
      One might be dubious about statistics on newspaper readership coming from the newspaper industry. “Do you read the newspaper?” is a bit like asking, “Are you informed or an ignoramus?” “I’m informed, sir, I’m informed.” So you want a methodology that somehow circumvents the human desire to claim more virtue than practiced. Were these “Facts About Newspapers” as collected by the newspaper industry so careful back in 2004? Did they have an incentive to be so careful?

      <

      p>
      Even if 63% of Americans still read the Sunday papers and 54% still read the weeklies, that means a very large block of our population is learning about what’s going on in our world from that part of the news that is not Paris Hilton, sports, and extremely witty repartee about weather. This is compounded by the odd fact that Americans don’t seem to believe newspapers as much as television and that newspapers are losing money, closing, and downsizing. There are no more afternoon newspapers or afternoon edidtions.

      <

      p>
      There are signs too of our nation being too under-informed for that debate about the issues our Founding Fathers envisioned in the eighteenth century. Why do so many still believe that Iraq had a connection to 9/11? Or that the Estate Tax might affect them?

      Log in to Reply
      • centralmassdad says

        July 6, 2007 at 11:57 am

        But many people know that the estate tax probably won’t affect them, but hope that it will, or will affect their children.

        Log in to Reply
        • kbusch says

          July 6, 2007 at 2:57 pm

          Did I misread your “dunno”?

          <

          p>
          Are you unconvinced by the argument that Saddam and Al Qaeda regarded one another as mortal enemies and by the lack of evidence linking the two? In neo-con us-them world, both Al Qaeda and Saddam were “thems” and so were allied — either practically or effectively. In the real world, Saddam was an obstacle to re-establishing the caliphate so dear to Bin Laden’s heart. Neither was about to aid the other as neither was that suicidal.

          Alas, many people do imagine that their children will become tycoons or celebrities or both. Sometimes hope is poison.

          Log in to Reply
          • centralmassdad says

            July 6, 2007 at 4:29 pm

            Dunno about [why people believe there is a connection between] Iraq and 9/11.

            <

            p>
            Answering the question posed at the end of the immediately preceding post.

            <

            p>
            Alas, many people hope to be wealthy? Hope is poison?  That sentiment is political death.  I’m surprised to see you write it so blithely, since it presupposes the perpetual gloom that has made liberalsim a spent force for the better part of four decades now.

            <

            p>
            I remember my grandmother– an immigrant who came to NY about 90 years ago– relaying an anecdote that seemed to capture the difference between Americans and Irishmen.  I’m sure the story is not original, and do not know the source, but find that it captures the gulf that has opened between the portion of our family that is American and that which remained in Ireland.

            <

            p>
            An poor Irishman walks by the palatial manor of a wealthy landlowner and enviously thinks: “I’d like to burn that house to the ground.”  A poor American walks by the same house and enviously thinks: “I’d like to be able to buy that house.”  The optimism of the latter makes a pretty big difference, and in no small measure is why this country has had an immigration debate for the past 150 years.

            <

            p>
            And I find it curious to note that you equate the having of wealth with being a “celebrity” or “tycoon.”  Both terms totally loaded with moral disapproval. I don’t necessarily hope that my kids are celebrities or whatever it is you mean by “tycoon”; I sure do hope they do better than I do, and well enough to qualify for the estate tax.  Sheesh, I hope I will, though I have a long ways to go.

            <

            p>
            The estate tax applies to estates worth more than a certain amount:  it used to be $1M, and might be up to $2M if it is not repealed.  This is not a lot.

            <

            p>
            Accumulating a million dollars, or even two, does not a tycoon make.  Upper middle class, and may not even that.  A great many people on the coasts who worked “working class” jobs and bought a house forty or fifty years ago are now nearly all the way there just because of the appreciation of their house alone.  A little savings account and boom, they’re there. 

            Log in to Reply
            • kbusch says

              July 6, 2007 at 5:04 pm

              Well, yes, hope is a particularly good thing. Having recently read Seligman’s Learned Optimism and other assorted stuff from the world of Positive Psychology, I cannot disagree with that. On the other hand, there are people, lots of alcholics, for example, who suffer from a kind of grandiosity. A relative of a friend of mine is falsely convinced he is rich, a belief at once amusing, false, and oddly comforting to the relative. Hope fulfills multiple functions, most of them good.

              <

              p>
              I think how liberalism expresses its goals for individuals and societies gets muddled. When we talk about societies where exactly half the children are above average, we can sound very dour indeed. We want to do right by the below average children and we accept that they exist.

              <

              p>
              On the other hand, to every individual child — below average or not, it is essential to hold out the hope of that little person excelling.

              <

              p>
              I truly think liberals try to do both and try hard to do both. Conservatives tend to hear everything as it relates to individuals. (Do conservatives even “believe in” sociology?) The result is something that sounds very dour, full of extra excuses and fatalism, but I think that’s just mixing up social prescription with individual prescription.

              Of course, I load my words. I want them to go pop! I wanted to emphasize that some hope really is false and illusory. As Seligman points out false and illusory can be really good. Good marriages, per him, are characterized by partners who overestimate one another’s good qualities. Sometimes, though, as studies have shown, pessimists evaluate stuff more accurately.

              Sorry about the Iraq commentary.

              Log in to Reply
      • mcrd says

        July 8, 2007 at 10:43 am

        Is a moron!

        <

        p>
        I realize that Leno’s “man on the street” segments may be the worst of the worst; however, conversely I am of the suspicion they are the best of the best.

        <

        p>
        Ask allegedly intelligent people just out of the ordinary questions re whatever and they have no idea what you are talking about.

        Log in to Reply
        • raj says

          July 8, 2007 at 11:44 am

          The avergae American Is a moron!

          <

          p>
          I suspect that at least some avergae Americans know how to spell “average.”

          <

          p>
          I realize that Leno’s “man on the street” segments may be the worst of the worst; however, conversely I am of the suspicion they are the best of the best.

          <

          p>
          Actually, I suspect that there are two dynamics going on with Leno’s segments.  One, they select them for comedic value.  Two, they encourage the interviewees to spoof.  The better the spoofers, the more the comedic value, and the more likely that they’ll be on national television.

          Log in to Reply
        • kbusch says

          July 9, 2007 at 12:31 am

          Ask allegedly intelligent people just out of the ordinary questions re whatever and they have no idea what you are talking about.

          You have empirical data here?

          Log in to Reply
  2. laurel says

    July 5, 2007 at 6:54 pm

    Manly Republicans?

    Log in to Reply
    • kbusch says

      July 5, 2007 at 9:54 pm

      An entire continent of the Left Blogosphere consists of nothing but fields of snark well fertilized by the pretensions to toughness and “masculinity” of right-wing posseurs like PowerLine, Victor Davis Hanson, and Instapundit.

      Log in to Reply
      • bob-neer says

        July 6, 2007 at 11:25 am

        Log in to Reply
        • kbusch says

          July 6, 2007 at 11:40 am

          I do not comment on Hanson, PowerLine, or Instapundit.

          Log in to Reply
          • bob-neer says

            July 7, 2007 at 6:38 pm

            You stay here with us! We need you 🙂

            Log in to Reply
          • raj says

            July 8, 2007 at 11:47 am

            …the last time I went to InstaIdiot, he did not allow for comments.

            <

            p>
            Heh.

            Log in to Reply
            • kbusch says

              July 9, 2007 at 12:02 pm

              I meant comment on them as Wolcott sometimes does, or World O’Crap, or Sadly No! or Poor Man Institute.

              Log in to Reply
              • raj says

                July 10, 2007 at 5:43 am

                …one can tell him what an idiot he is?

                <

                p>
                I’m surprised that an otherwise obscure law professor from Tennessee has gotten to be so famous merely because of the Internet.

                Log in to Reply
  3. cadmium says

    July 5, 2007 at 8:51 pm

    Rudy is wimp who got in the way on 9-11, Romney is incompetent and dishonest, and the McCain picture hugging Bush speaks for itself. 

    Log in to Reply
  4. cadmium says

    July 5, 2007 at 9:37 pm

    make a funny cartoon. 

    Log in to Reply
    • mcrd says

      July 8, 2007 at 10:51 am

      Ya.

      <

      p>
      Dick Cheney doesn’t give a crap who gets in his way. You get in his line of fire and you’re going to catch a bullet. Ergo, No one above the level of VP is allowed to hunt with Cheney.

      <

      p>
      Going back to the original premise. Is it real or imagined?
      Have democrat candidates actually become feminized? Interesting hypothesis.

      Log in to Reply
  5. edgarthearmenian says

    July 8, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    Alan Alda’s of the world: unite.  We are not girly boys….

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 7 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…
  • Christopher on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsNow we seem to have lost the ability to rate comments, h…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe 9th Essex district James and I share as fellow Wakef…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

raylaforma RaylaForMA @raylaforma ·
45m

Interesting little case going on in Virginia. Don't you think? @wbz @7News #historic #mapoli

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0QFrSq5KzjuQwRMrMeXwgzdvd7khKPuFsueDAMKsF1aapQKLzkUpiMsd4b23suXgwl&id=100057082794984

Reply on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Retweet on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Like on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Twitter 1559930291506085888
robyn4senate Robyn Kennedy @robyn4senate ·
46m

Thank you Viviana Abreu-Hernandez and Linda Maykel for hosting an incredible gathering yesterday. I am empowered by our conversations and look forward to putting in the work in the senate to ensure that the concerns of our communities are heard. #mapoli #worcpoli #senate

2

Reply on Twitter 1559929893877678086 Retweet on Twitter 1559929893877678086 Like on Twitter 1559929893877678086 1 Twitter 1559929893877678086
supaman90692910 Supaman @supaman90692910 ·
47m

no diehl #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Retweet on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Like on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Twitter 1559929729427406849
nwayne66 I slapped SCOTUS & Ouiser Boudreaux💉💉💉😷🇺🇦 @nwayne66 ·
50m

Leader of police advisory panel 'shocked' to be denied access to internal #Pittsfield police report on fatal shooting https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/local/advisory-panel-police-pittsfield/article_3c590570-1dbb-11ed-8995-93f5c15d3873.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share via @berkshireeagle #mapoli #westernmass #MiguelEstrella

Reply on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Retweet on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Like on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Twitter 1559928967271964678
martilliforrep Martilli for Congress @martilliforrep ·
55m

Thank you @newsmax for having me on alongside some great guests.

@ShaunKraisman @EmmaRechenberg @mgburkholder @ButlerForIL1

#MA01 #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559927827310546945 Retweet on Twitter 1559927827310546945 2 Like on Twitter 1559927827310546945 2 Twitter 1559927827310546945
alisonkuznitz Alison Kuznitz @alisonkuznitz ·
55m

GOP governor hopeful Chris Doughty and running mate Kate Campanale are holding a presser to bash the “deceit” from Democratic candidate for governor AG Maura Healey on tax relief. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Retweet on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Like on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Twitter 1559927756749692928
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.