Anyone worried that Scooter Libby was going to have trouble coming up with the cash to pay the $250,000 fine — the only part of his sentence that remains following President Bush’s appalling commutation of his prison sentence from 30 months to nothing (30 months was too harsh? then why not reduce it?) — can rest easy. Doesn’t seem to have been a problem.
Please share widely!
laurel says
he signed with disappearing ink. đŸ™‚
raj says
…he will claim the source of funds as income or a gift.
gary says
shack says
Speaking engagements to neocon groups or a book advance. Just like Ollie North. What a scam.
david says
the money may well have come out of the millions that Fred Thompson & Co. raised for his legal defense fund. Scooter’s going to be just fine.
michaelbate says
Bush apologist David Brooks, on All Things Considered, claimed that this fine would exhaust Scooter’s life savings.
<
p>
Personally I doubt that Scooter will be eating at soup kitchens or living in homeless shelters.
<
p>
I would hope that, after that, no one would continue to take David Brooks seriously.
bob-neer says
He is the Alan Colmes of the right. I think that is enough said.
tblade says
I know this comment doesn’t add anything to the dialogue, but I’m glad I’m not alone in my feelings.
johnk says
Can privately collect donations, they do not have to list names of donors. Quote at the top of the web page:
<
p>
“Scooter Libby is one of the most capable and talented individuals I have ever known” – Dick Cheney
raj says
…to the extent that the trustee (the administrator of the trust) has records, all of the records could be subject to a subpoena. As would the trustee. And it would be difficult for anyone to believe that a trustee did not recollect who gave umpteen-thousands of dollars to his or her trust.
joeltpatterson says
“Your honor, I do not recall…”
<
p>
If Alberto Gonzales can push that lame bluff, whoever runs Scooter’s slush fund can do it, too.
k1mgy says
Would be sweet if it bounced.
cardboard-box says
Then Scooter would be stuck with an additional $45 fee.
sabutai says
If you bounce a big check, could you end up doing time?
cardboard-box says
but the lower left corner of the image seems to suggest that the worst that he could face is a $45 fine. However, given that this appears to be a cashier’s check, bouncing seems unlikely.
eaboclipper says
I think not. But nice thought. If it’s not a certified bank check then both the Smoking Gun and BMG are helping identity fraud by publishing the bank account information of Scooter Libby. I don’t care what you think of him, publishing his bank account information is not a good idea.
johnk says
the number of his checking account or providing any information about Scooter. You can get a bank check anywhere, you don’t need an account there.
<
p>
Nice mock outrage by the way.
<
p>
The bank check, for the love of god they’ve shown a public document….um, to the public?
eaboclipper says
notice I said its a certified or cashiers check. If it wasn’t there would be a problem. If it was a check from his PRIVATE Checking account there would be a problem. Please re-read what I wrote. You can do so below, so you don’t even have to hit scroll.
<
p>
<
p>
No mock outrage, someone made the statement that it would be nice if the check bounced. It won’t bounce because it’s a certified or cashiers check, I think of them as the same and use the term interchangeably.
david says
are emphatically not the same thing. A certified check is ordinarily drawn on the account holder’s own account, and the bank has then certified that sufficient funds exist in the account and has segregated those funds until the check is cashed or deposited. A cashier’s check, in contrast, is drawn directly against the bank; it is signed by bank officers (note that the check reproduced above is not signed by Scooter Libby); and it has nothing to do with the individual’s account. Note that the check delivered by Libby to the Court says “Cashier’s Check” on the top.
<
p>
So settle down, EaBo. As usual, you’re way off base.
centralmassdad says
Have been replaced by cashier’s checks, and it has been a long time since I have seen one. If you try to have your bank certify your check, they’ll just issue a teller’s check.
<
p>
Although you’re right, I find many people use the terms interchangeably. Because certified checks are now so rare, this isn’t really that much of a mistake.
raj says
…it was a cashier’s check. It would be a relatively simple matter to subpoena the records of where the funds deposited into the account came from.
les-richter says
This might just be the biggest laugh of all.
rob-peters says
Mike Gravel has posted some of this. It really doesn’t matter. We’ve got 8 years of Clinton coming up that will be followed by 8 years of (Jeb) Bush. The Republic is dead, get over it. You’re no more than a serf, mastered by people that plot together how best to serve themselves.
peter-porcupine says
<
p>
Um…does anybody HERE know what the name ‘Paul’ indicates?
gary says
I think he was ‘the cute one’
joeltpatterson says
I am the Walrus.
les-richter says
Here I thought the whole article was silly and it turns out that Scooter did represent Marc Rich for the pardon. I’m afraid to read it again as something else might be true.
joeltpatterson says
From the Newark Star-Ledger:
<
p>
bostonshepherd says
Progressive math.