Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Libby pays his fine

July 5, 2007 By David

Anyone worried that Scooter Libby was going to have trouble coming up with the cash to pay the $250,000 fine — the only part of his sentence that remains following President Bush’s appalling commutation of his prison sentence from 30 months to nothing (30 months was too harsh? then why not reduce it?) — can rest easy.  Doesn’t seem to have been a problem.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bush, libby

Comments

  1. laurel says

    July 5, 2007 at 4:18 pm

    he signed with disappearing ink.  đŸ™‚

  2. raj says

    July 5, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    …he will claim the source of funds as income or a gift.

    • gary says

      July 6, 2007 at 11:00 am

  3. shack says

    July 5, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Speaking engagements to neocon groups or a book advance.  Just like Ollie North.  What a scam.

    • david says

      July 5, 2007 at 7:13 pm

      the money may well have come out of the millions that Fred Thompson & Co. raised for his legal defense fund.  Scooter’s going to be just fine.

      • michaelbate says

        July 5, 2007 at 7:49 pm

        Bush apologist David Brooks, on All Things Considered, claimed that this fine would exhaust Scooter’s life savings.

        <

        p>
        Personally I doubt that Scooter will be eating at soup kitchens or living in homeless shelters.

        <

        p>
        I would hope that, after that, no one would continue to take David Brooks seriously.

        • bob-neer says

          July 6, 2007 at 11:27 am

          He is the Alan Colmes of the right. I think that is enough said.

          • tblade says

            July 6, 2007 at 11:33 am

            I know this comment doesn’t add anything to the dialogue, but I’m glad I’m not alone in my feelings.

      • johnk says

        July 5, 2007 at 8:16 pm

        Can privately collect donations, they do not have to list names of donors.  Quote at the top of the web page:

        <

        p>
        “Scooter Libby is one of the most capable and talented individuals I have ever known” – Dick Cheney

        • raj says

          July 6, 2007 at 1:50 am

          …to the extent that the trustee (the administrator of the trust) has records, all of the records could be subject to a subpoena.  As would the trustee.  And it would be difficult for anyone to believe that a trustee did not recollect who gave umpteen-thousands of dollars to his or her trust.

          • joeltpatterson says

            July 7, 2007 at 3:39 pm

            “Your honor, I do not recall…”

            <

            p>
            If Alberto Gonzales can push that lame bluff, whoever runs Scooter’s slush fund can do it, too.

  4. k1mgy says

    July 5, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    Would be sweet if it bounced.

    • cardboard-box says

      July 5, 2007 at 9:14 pm

      Then Scooter would be stuck with an additional $45 fee.

      • sabutai says

        July 5, 2007 at 10:04 pm

        If you bounce a big check, could you end up doing time?

        • cardboard-box says

          July 6, 2007 at 4:11 am

          but the lower left corner of the image seems to suggest that the worst that he could face is a $45 fine. However, given that this appears to be a cashier’s check, bouncing seems unlikely.

    • eaboclipper says

      July 6, 2007 at 8:57 am

      I think not.  But nice thought. If it’s not a certified bank check then both the Smoking Gun and BMG are helping identity fraud by publishing the bank account information of Scooter Libby. I don’t care what you think of him, publishing his bank account information is not a good idea.

      • johnk says

        July 6, 2007 at 9:06 am

        the number of his checking account or providing any information about Scooter.  You can get a bank check anywhere, you don’t need an account there. 

        <

        p>
        Nice mock outrage by the way.

        <

        p>
        The bank check, for the love of god they’ve shown a public document….um, to the public?

        • eaboclipper says

          July 6, 2007 at 10:58 am

          notice I said its a certified or cashiers check.  If it wasn’t there would be a problem.  If it was a check from his PRIVATE Checking account there would be a problem.  Please re-read what I wrote.  You can do so below, so you don’t even have to hit scroll.

          <

          p>

          seeing as that is a certified bank check  (0.00 / 0)
          I think not.  But nice thought. If it’s not a certified bank check then both the Smoking Gun and BMG are helping identity fraud by publishing the bank account information of Scooter Libby. I don’t care what you think of him, publishing his bank account information is not a good idea.

          <

          p>
          No mock outrage, someone made the statement that it would be nice if the check bounced.  It won’t bounce because it’s a certified or cashiers check, I think of them as the same and use the term interchangeably.

          • david says

            July 6, 2007 at 1:51 pm

            are emphatically not the same thing.  A certified check is ordinarily drawn on the account holder’s own account, and the bank has then certified that sufficient funds exist in the account and has segregated those funds until the check is cashed or deposited.  A cashier’s check, in contrast, is drawn directly against the bank; it is signed by bank officers (note that the check reproduced above is not signed by Scooter Libby); and it has nothing to do with the individual’s account.  Note that the check delivered by Libby to the Court says “Cashier’s Check” on the top.

            <

            p>
            So settle down, EaBo.  As usual, you’re way off base.

            • centralmassdad says

              July 6, 2007 at 2:19 pm

              Have been replaced by cashier’s checks, and it has been a long time since I have seen one.  If you try to have your bank certify your check, they’ll just issue a teller’s check.

              <

              p>
              Although you’re right, I find many people use the terms interchangeably.  Because certified checks are now so rare, this isn’t really that much of a mistake.

      • raj says

        July 6, 2007 at 9:06 am

        …it was a cashier’s check.  It would be a relatively simple matter to subpoena the records of where the funds deposited into the account came from.

  5. les-richter says

    July 5, 2007 at 8:48 pm

    This  might just be the biggest laugh of all.

    • rob-peters says

      July 5, 2007 at 9:17 pm

      Mike Gravel has posted some of this.  It really doesn’t matter.  We’ve got 8 years of Clinton coming up that will be followed by 8 years of (Jeb) Bush.  The Republic is dead, get over it.  You’re no more than a serf, mastered by people that plot together how best to serve themselves.

    • peter-porcupine says

      July 6, 2007 at 3:30 pm

      We shouldn’t be too surprised. After all, all these Mossad agents in charge of our country are servants of the Rothschild cause, and the Rothschilds pay all our Presidents and all the other presidents and monarchs of the world. – The loan guarantees enabling the bribes cost nothing anyway – or don’t you know about this little technique? And the Rothschilds are the Fed. as they are all the other National Banks, so – Oh well.

      And Ron Paul says he will dismantle the Fed, does he?  Don’t you know what the name ‘Paul’ indicates?  So he may say, but some hope!

      <

      p>
      Um…does anybody HERE know what the name ‘Paul’ indicates?

      • gary says

        July 6, 2007 at 3:37 pm

        I think he was ‘the cute one’

        • joeltpatterson says

          July 7, 2007 at 3:42 pm

          I am the Walrus.

      • les-richter says

        July 6, 2007 at 7:09 pm

        Here I thought the whole article was silly and it turns out that Scooter did represent Marc Rich for the pardon.  I’m afraid to read it again as something else might be true.

  6. joeltpatterson says

    July 7, 2007 at 3:53 pm

    From the Newark Star-Ledger:

    <

    p>

    [T]he president spoke of the personal pain Libby has experienced. Bush was fairly immune to that sort of argument while he was governor of Texas. In six years, he denied requests from 152 inmates facing execution. Bush said his standard was: “Is there any doubt about this individual’s guilt or innocence?” Can there be any doubt about Libby’s?

    In Libby’s case, Bush said, he respected the jury’s verdict but decided the 30-month prison sentence was “excessive.”

    We wonder what the families of those 152 inmates put to death think about that.

     

    • bostonshepherd says

      July 8, 2007 at 6:10 pm

      Progressive math.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.