Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Tribal politics threaten casino

August 26, 2007 By dkennedy

In the Boston Globe, Christine Wallgren reports that officials from 17 surrounding communities and two regional planning agencies will meet tomorrow with Gov. Deval Patrick’s economic-development czar, Dan O’Connell, to ask that Patrick make no decision on casino gambling until the issue has been thoroughly studied. From the context, I’d say they want it studied to death. Good.

At Cape Cod Today, Peter Kenney keeps pounding away at Marshall, and opines that he’s still calling the shots behind the scenes. Well, maybe not after tomorrow night.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: casino, middleborough

Comments

  1. ryepower12 says

    August 26, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    A lot of the things he has to say are very damaging, so I’m curious to hear about his biases and prejudices. Don’t get me wrong – Glenn Marshall doesn’t sound like I guy I’d be friends with and I certainly disagree with his cause (building a casino), but it’s important to have the full story too.

    • peter-porcupine says

      August 26, 2007 at 5:02 pm

      …and posted about him yesterday HERE.

      <

      p>
      He’s a very skilled carpenter, and that is his ‘day job’.  His late wife, from whom he was divorced, as a very gifted artist.  However, for just about ten years he’s had his TV show called The Great Gadfly, and he has long been a ruthless commentator on town/Cape politics.  One thing – he takes a lot of time, but he does research and he can back up what he says.  He’s relatively new to blogging, but in a sense he’s been doing it VERBALLY for longer than blogs have been around.

      <

      p>
      He and I have worked together in a larger group to abolish the Cape Cod Comisson, but other than that we haven’t had any direct association – and besides, he disapproves of my opinions on that matter.  Still friendly, but not buddies.

      • ryepower12 says

        August 26, 2007 at 8:18 pm

        He was saying a lot of things that I’d just oh-so-love to hear in my quest to block what would be a terrible thing for Massachusetts… it’s at these times that we, as people, need to be most careful in who we place our trust in. So, I was just curious =)

    • mcrd says

      August 27, 2007 at 9:09 am

      Why the pejorative? I mean the guy has someting to say, and right off the bat he must be a “hater”.
      Give it a rest. Does everyone have to have an axe to grind?

      • ryepower12 says

        August 27, 2007 at 5:18 pm

        When people come out of the woodwork saying all the things you want to hear, that’s the time you should be the most skeptical. Just ask the Bush administration and their primary source of most of their info on Iraq and Hussein – Ahmed Chalabi. Boy, was he saying a lot of things we wanted to hear.

        <

        p>
        So, it’s not that I’m ‘hating’ on him, it’s just that I wanted to know a little bit more about him – given the fact that he was saying things that are golden to my ears.

        • raj says

          August 28, 2007 at 4:11 am

          …”hate” means anyone that you disagree with.  You disagree with a policy of GWBush–you hate him.

          <

          p>
          That is a sad debasement of the Amerikanische Sprache (which is why I don’t use the word “English” to characterize it) but the sad fact is, that it is true.

          <

          p>
          What you have to understand is that, whereas “disagreement” is an intellectual term, “hate” is an emotive term.  Which is why they–the politicians and their hangers on and advisors–use it.  Americans are profoundly emotive.  Intellectual?  Not so much.

        • peter-porcupine says

          August 28, 2007 at 1:55 pm

          …his fame hasn’t necessarily crossed the bridge.  I took it as a fair question about somebody I happen to know – that’s why I answered it! :~)

  2. trickle-up says

    August 26, 2007 at 4:31 pm

    I hope I am wrong, but it seems to me that the story will end up being, “Casino politics threatens tribe.”

  3. heartlanddem says

    August 27, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    Any news on the Regional meeting with O’Connell and the abutting towns to Middleborough that was scheduled today?

    <

    p>
    Mayor Bissonette (D) Chicopee, was hosting a Casino (get to know your dealer) discussion this evening, too.
    [http://www.masslive….]

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.