Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Unassailable generals

September 16, 2007 By lovable-liberal

John Kerry said:

 

I don’t like any kind of characterizations in our politics that call into question any active duty, distinguished general, … who I think under any circumstances serves with the best interests of our country.

 

I have two words for Kerry:  William Westmoreland.

The very real question that MoveOn raised is whether we can trust Gen. Petraeus to serve the best interests of America, to whose Constitution he swore his oath, or only the best interests of his patron, Duhbya.

(Come see me at home.)

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bush, duhbya, kerry, military, petraeus

Comments

  1. sabutai says

    September 16, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    Military leaders who cannot be questioned:

    Idi Amin

    Mu'amar Qadafi

    Mobutu Sese Soko

    Pol Pot

    Fidel Castro

    Why anyone would want to put American leadership on this list is beyond my understanding. 

     

    • tblade says

      September 16, 2007 at 5:05 pm

      …but this man has been on fire for the past few weeks.

    • raj says

      September 17, 2007 at 2:18 am

      “Americans are very keen on themselves”

      <

      p>
      a British lady once remarked to us as we were discussing politics with her on a train in southern France.  What she meant was that many Americans consider themselves, and by extension, their political leaders, as beyond criticism.

      <

      p>
      That’s what this silliness regarding MoveOn’s use of the pun on Petraeus’s name is about.  If it wasn’t that, the pro-warriors would have found something else to moan and groan over.

  2. kbusch says

    September 16, 2007 at 6:44 pm

    Not being persuasive, factual, honest, or convincing, the Bush Administration wanted to load up their Iraq policy onto General Petreaus' reputation and ride it through Congress. The idea was precisely to rely on the fact that Petreaus could get away with mendacity because no one would accuse a noble warrior of lying.

    But guess what? His presentation was dishonest and that dishonesty costs lives, limbs, and money.

    So somebody had to take on the illusion of the impregnably perfect reputation of General Petreaus. MoveOn did. Even if they offended three quarters of Democrats and made everyone shake their heads, what MoveOn did was to make space for people to say, “This guy is a liar.”

    You know what? That was really helpful.

    That's what we need to get out of a country where a majority of people living there don't think we belong.

  3. purplerain1 says

    September 16, 2007 at 9:27 pm

    if the report was criticized instead of impugning the man's reputation?  Even Hillary chose that route.  I think the ad was extreme.  My father-in-law, now an independent after years as a Democrat, was very nearly apoplectic.  He served in WWII, and was appalled by the ad.  I imagine there are more than just of few like him across the country.  I think there was a better way to provide an insightful analysis without attacking the person.  I don't think we're going to gain all that much with this kind of “help.”   

     

    • kbusch says

      September 16, 2007 at 10:47 pm

      So we're supposed to say that the guy is not being honest without impugning his reputation.  I'm not sure how one carries off that rhetorical stunt. I don't think it's possible.

    • lovable-liberal says

      September 17, 2007 at 7:23 am

      … actually read the ad?  Or was he reacting to what the wingnut media monolith told him?

      • purplerain1 says

        September 17, 2007 at 3:58 pm

        He did read the ad; why would you ask that?  And he has a computer and he's very internet savvy. 

        And KB as for calling the report into question without launching an ad-hominem attack – it gets done all the time.  Professional people can question the methodology, the scope, metrics, etc of analysis without impugning someone's integrity.  Level-head professional analysis will trump vitriolic hyperbole.  The one thing I did note from the hearing was when one of the Senators asked Petreaus is his strategies would make America safe.  When he was pressed further (he answered initially in military-speak) he acknowledged that he “didn't know.” 

        • laurel says

          September 17, 2007 at 4:36 pm

          I used to think this.  Then I saw Bush re-elected, gay people’s citizenship and humanity savaged, and the civil liberties of all Americans curtailed.  Clearly, a calm and logical conversation just doesn’t break the wax barrier in some people’s ears.

        • lovable-liberal says

          September 17, 2007 at 11:56 pm

          Gen. Petraeus went before Congress as a political representative of Duhbya.  I wish it were not true, but I'd be naive to believe otherwise.  Petraeus, whatever his other qualities, has a history of shilling for the Bushists, dating to his well-known 2004 election season op-ed.  He wasn't prominent enough for that to be “peace is at hand,” but the op-ed was still a political act.

          Purple, if you think analysis trumps message, where have you been for the past, oh, forever? If one voter in twenty gathers facts and makes rational political decisions, I'd be surprised.

          The funny thing is that the MoveOn ad did includes analysis; it just wasn't dispassionate enough to suit many people.  Dispassion is valuable, but it is not convincing.  Witness the controversies over tobacco, evolution, global warming, and other aspects of reality, where marketing fog intentionally perpetrated by PR firms and their astroturf creations prevents the rational interpretation of data.

          As for why I asked about whether you father-in-law had actually seen the ad:  His understanding of it seemed limited to the headline, not to the footnoted analysis.  Further, think about all the times when the nation as a whole has reached facile conclusions based on conclusions that the media helped us leap to without real foundation:

          • The insurance industry's campaign against the Clinton health plan in 1993
          • Whitewater
          • The lies about Al Gore, especially the invented-the-Internet myth (see the Daily Howler)
          • The Saddam-al Qaeda “connection”
          • The Swiftboating of John Kerry
          • Etc.

          The GOP media operation gets its narrative line out and drives people to let their imaginations run away with them.  That's happening here too.

          I'm tired of trying sweet reason on Al Capone, so I'm not inclined to apologize for rhetorical blows that the Bushists think are excessive.  I'm more inclined to hit them again. 

  4. purplerain1 says

    September 18, 2007 at 10:48 pm

    but no Wednesday morning quarterbacking if you give the GOP ammo in the South and the West for launching an ad-hominem attack on a general.  I guess we don't need those votes. 

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

mszafranski413 Matt Szafranski @mszafranski413 ·
2h

Senator @ewarren announces her bid for a third term, launching a race much different from her prior two and after her unsuccessful bid for president. But the context of the moment plays to her strengths as a crusading consumer advocate. #mapoli https://www.wmasspi.com/2023/03/briefings-elizabeth-warren-rides-again-officially-now.html

Reply on Twitter 1640566901070868480 Retweet on Twitter 1640566901070868480 1 Like on Twitter 1640566901070868480 Twitter 1640566901070868480
jonathancohn Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn @jonathancohn ·
3h

.@BillHumphreyMA's birthday is today. He might not see this on Twitter anymore, but he will see your birthday wishes if you donate $32 to his birthday fundraiser. #mapoli

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/billhumphreyma32

Reply on Twitter 1640556594864828416 Retweet on Twitter 1640556594864828416 1 Like on Twitter 1640556594864828416 3 Twitter 1640556594864828416
jacquelynmryan Mx. Jacquelyn Ryan @jacquelynmryan ·
3h

Knowledge is power and the citizens have a right to know what the least transparent state legislature in the country is doing with their money. #AuditTheLegislature #mapoli

Diana DiZoglio @DianaDiZoglio

Knowledge is power, and power should belong to the people.
#mapoli #auditthelegislature @InsideLowell

Reply on Twitter 1640552850978635778 Retweet on Twitter 1640552850978635778 Like on Twitter 1640552850978635778 Twitter 1640552850978635778
our_cambridge Your Cambridge MA @our_cambridge ·
3h

RECORD COLD EAST WEST + CHICAGO

Remember:

·RECORD COLD = Proof of man-made Ice Age climate crisis

·Crisis always fault of Americans creating abundance and plentiful food

·Wash DC MUST PUNISH we Americans even more

#CambMA #NHpolitics #MAsen #VTtax #MEpolitics #MApoli Vermont

3

Leigh Giangreco @LeighGiangreco

Can think of nothing more Chicago than covering a mayoral election on a 14-degree March day and I walk into a Mexican restaurant playing Uncle Buck

Reply on Twitter 1640545982629703683 Retweet on Twitter 1640545982629703683 Like on Twitter 1640545982629703683 Twitter 1640545982629703683
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
4h

#mapoli #nhpolitics

Tony - Resistance @TonyHussein4

For Rupert Murdoch, only the money matters. Fox "News" hosts Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham, pushed election fraud claims, knowing they were untrue. Don't trust Rupert Murdoch's media empire, which includes the New York Post (NY Post), & The Wall Street Journal.

Reply on Twitter 1640543880142630912 Retweet on Twitter 1640543880142630912 Like on Twitter 1640543880142630912 Twitter 1640543880142630912
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
4h

It doesn't explain why @realDonaldTrump deleted the post. Did @SeanHannity ask him why it was deleted and if he knows threatening DAs in NY state is a felony? #mapoli #nhpolitics

Acyn @Acyn

Trump: That was to baseball to promote made in America 
Hannity: Do you know how it was interpreted?
Trump: Well, because that’s the fake news media.

Reply on Twitter 1640542972394500098 Retweet on Twitter 1640542972394500098 1 Like on Twitter 1640542972394500098 Twitter 1640542972394500098
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.