Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Breaking! Ogo blew off UMass-Lowell students to talk to Fox News

October 10, 2007 By David 38 Comments

BMG News has learned that Jim Ogonowski was scheduled to talk to students in a UMass-Lowell class yesterday morning.  But he cancelled literally at the last minute — because Fox News called.

Boy, talk about your misplaced priorities!  Ogo could have spent an hour engaging directly with a class full of students — you know, the future, and all that — many of whom are probably MA-05 voters.  Instead, he chose to talk to a right-wing “news” outlet.

The correct response to the Fox News producer, Jim, was “gosh, I’d love to talk to you guys, but I have a prior commitment at that time that is more important, since it’s in the district.  I’m available later in the day.”  But, apparently, what Fox News heard was more along the lines of “really?  You betcha!  Name the time and I’ll be there!”

We report, you decide.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: ma-05, ogonowski, tsongas

Comments

  1. tblade says

    October 10, 2007 at 2:13 pm

    …Ogo blew off people who “COME FROM the EFFING DISTRICT“? Good move, Ogo. Because, of course, “regular guys” are always appearing on Fox News instead of engaging working class people from Massachusetts.

    Log in to Reply
  2. ed-prisby says

    October 10, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    You don’t vote. 

    <

    p>
    I don’t mean to be contrarian here, but I totally understant the campaign choice by the Ogmeister.  To the extent there was a percentage of FOX news viewers in his district that vote, by going on FOX, he’s actually talking to people who might go vote for him.

    <

    p>
    By going to UMass (to a single class?), he’d be talking to: 1. People who typically don’t vote; and 2. people who typically wouldn’t vote for him.

    <

    p>
    I’m just guessing, but I think that was probably his rational.

    Log in to Reply
    • raj says

      October 10, 2007 at 3:42 pm

      …by going on Faux News instead, he’d be talking primarily to people outside the district, who couldn’t vote for him anyway.

      Log in to Reply
      • stomv says

        October 10, 2007 at 3:46 pm

        represent more voters than one UMass class-ful.

        <

        p>
        Personally, I think this is a non-story.

        Log in to Reply
      • noternie says

        October 10, 2007 at 3:46 pm

        Even if only a very small percentage of Fox’s audience is in his district there’s a good chance there’s more people in the district watching Fox than sitting in that class, no?

        <

        p>
        I’m still not sure it’s good form to cancel at the last minute unless there’s breaking news he’s involved with. But I disagree with your math.

        Log in to Reply
        • raj says

          October 10, 2007 at 4:45 pm

          Even if only a very small percentage of Fox’s audience is in his district there’s a good chance there’s more people in the district watching Fox than sitting in that class, no?

          <

          p>
          Doubtful.  It seems to me that most of the Faux viewers would be at work at the time.

          <

          p>
          Irrespective of that, it strikes me that Faux could have sent out a crew to the classroom to broadcast his appearance.  If they had done that, they would have avoided the issue.

          Log in to Reply
          • centralmassdad says

            October 10, 2007 at 4:56 pm

            That Fox has quite a number of stay-at-home moms as viewers.

            Log in to Reply
          • noternie says

            October 11, 2007 at 11:29 am

            Some people work nights. Or second shift. Or have weekdays off rather than Saturday/Sunday.

            <

            p>
            Some people are on vacation and just getting their day going. Some people are retired or on disability.

            <

            p>
            Some students at UM-L and other schools might not have class and be watching in their dorms.

            <

            p>
            Restaurants, barber shops, convenience stores, Dunkin Donuts and tons of other places in the district would commonly have a tv on, maybe even tuned to Fox news.

            <

            p>
            I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt that the UM-L class had as many as 200 students in it. And I’ll even conceede they were ALL registered voters in the 5th District.

            <

            p>
            I still think there were more people in the district watching Fox news at the time.

            <

            p>
            It doesn’t matter what MOST of the Fox news viewers are doing that at time. It doesn’t take even a small minority of Fox viewers to easily outnumber the students in that class.

            <

            p>
            And then the campaign or some Rebulican blogger might grab a clip of the thing from YouTube and email it to a bunch of undecideds.

            <

            p>
            As for sending a crew out. Huh? The guy got a last minute invite probably because someone cancelled. They don’t have the time to put together the logistics to do a remote. And if they did have the time, they wouldn’t do it with Ogo. Someone important enough to get a live remote is too important to be a last minute invite.

            Log in to Reply
    • laurel says

      October 10, 2007 at 5:25 pm

      I voted.  In fact, I never missed an election (still don’t).  And I was a biology major, not in poli. sci.

      Log in to Reply
    • ryepower12 says

      October 10, 2007 at 6:24 pm

      people from the ages of 18-25 or so vote at much higher percentages than those 30-40. In ’06, about half of the former bracket voted… and that was a midterm year. But feel free to continue the wacky stereotypes that young people don’t vote and don’t care. I gaurantee politicians who think like that (ex. Oganowski) won’t be winning too many elections anytime soon.

      Log in to Reply
      • ed-prisby says

        October 10, 2007 at 7:13 pm

        But feel free to continue the wacky stereotypes that young people don’t vote and don’t care.

        <

        p>
        Thanks, Ryan.  I’d almost forgotten how much I appreciate your overly-snarky responses to comments you disagree with.  I’m not here to put Generation Y down, just pointing out I don’t completely disagree with a campaign tactic.

        <

        p>
        I didn’t look at the 2006 stats.  But, stats from 2004 and prior do confirm that voters 18-24 are less often registered, and those registered less often vote, than their peers.  Take it for what it’s worth. http://www.census.go…

        <

        p>
        The .pdf report under “1. Voting” is helpful,.  Everything else I’m reading says that only 24% of eligible voters aged 18-29 actually turn out to vote.

        <

        p>
        But hey, the college kids are more than welcomed to prove me wrong this time around.

        Log in to Reply
        • stomv says

          October 11, 2007 at 11:01 am

          because young voters are much more likely to be registered in more than one location — and not illegally, I’d point out.

          <

          p>
          Register while a senior in high school at home.
          Register while in college in another state.
          Register when you move to the city for your first job in a third state.

          <

          p>
          You’re now registered three times, and likely to stay on the rolls in all places for a while.  Even if 100% of these people voted, it’d show their turnout as 33%.

          <

          p>
          Sure, not everybody registers, goes out of state, moves twice, etc.  But, enough do that it skews the data.  Young people are more mobile, and therefore more likely to be on two or more voter-reg lists.

          Log in to Reply
      • ed-prisby says

        October 10, 2007 at 7:16 pm

        people from the ages of 18-25 or so vote at much higher percentages than those 30-40. In ’06, about half of the former bracket voted…

        <

        p>
        If you’ve got a link to those stats, I’d love to see it.  Is that half of all eligible voters?

        Log in to Reply
  3. nuwill says

    October 10, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    Even political science students don’t vote…

    Log in to Reply
  4. tblade says

    October 10, 2007 at 4:46 pm

    …may or may not vote, but they do go home and talk to their families, friends, and co-workers and say, “Hey, guess what? Jim Ogonowski was supposed to speak to my class but he blew us off.” Even if the student might not vote, her parents might and they might carry the image of No Show-gonowski into the voting booth.

    <

    p>
    Now, compare the negative impact of No Show-gonowski vs the random tree-falling-in-the-woods appearance on daytime Fox News. I’m betting that even if Jim did reach people in the EFFING DISTRICT** via Fox News, they were people who are going to vote for Ogo anyway. If Jim showed up to UML, even if he didn’t get new voters, his appearance would have been at least neutral and cost him fewer votes than a no-show. Indifference of opinion is better than a negative opinion.

    <

    p>
    That’s my guess, anyway.

    Log in to Reply
  5. lightiris says

    October 10, 2007 at 4:56 pm

    is clearly a Nogo for prime time.  Geez, this guy is a joke.

    Log in to Reply
  6. striker57 says

    October 10, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    I have to support Ogo on this one. The opportunity to get air time on a national affiliate (that is totally in the bag with you politically) trumps a class at the local college. Just plain political reality.

    <

    p>
    First, Ogo doesn’t have the money to buy media access like this. You never turn down free media as an underdog / underfunded camapign.

    <

    p>
    Second, it’s not a one tine live shot early in the morning. It videotape that will play all day on Faux News. And given the phony news network’s political bend, they will be playing it again and again into tonight and on the political shows this weekend.

    <

    p>
    There are plenty of good knocks you can use on Ogo. Certainly his political judgement on SCHIPs has been poor (won’t even begin to slam his policy judgement – everyone has done that very well) but he made the right political call on this one.

    Log in to Reply
    • raj says

      October 10, 2007 at 6:08 pm

      …the likelihood that he would not have wanted to have been humiliated before a potentially hostile audience at UML, and his invitation from Faux gave him an out.

      <

      p>
      I still wonder.  Has anyone posted a response to me on a comment thread here below about how much he might be receiving in ag-business federal welfare for his grass farm?

      Log in to Reply
    • eaboclipper says

      October 10, 2007 at 6:21 pm

      Niki was in it as well with an interview.  It was a piece on both major party candidates.  Sorry to steal your thunder David.

      Log in to Reply
    • petr says

      October 10, 2007 at 7:12 pm

      Understandable Political Decision (5.00 / 1)

      I have to support Ogo on this one. The opportunity to get air time on a national affiliate (that is totally in the bag with you politically) trumps a class at the local college. Just plain political reality.

      <

      p>
      There are several things wrong with this analysis:

      <

      p>
      A)Ogo’s not a national candidate; and 2) there’s no math anywhere that says the amount of people he’ll reach, never mind persuade, is even close to the amount of people he could see face to face, and probably a good deal more he could almost definately persuade; and iii) and even that number is potentially dwarfed by the amount of people who might be exposed to the bad press that could stink off of this.

      <

      p>
      In fact, I’d say this is as close to an admission of defeat you’ll get before election night…

      Log in to Reply
      • striker57 says

        October 10, 2007 at 7:30 pm

        1. Right now the Tsongas/Ogo race is the only game in town and it is being played as the national media watches and reports. Network media coverage plays on local affiliates and any air time is good time for a candidate. Especially good for a candidate who doesn’t have the funds to match Niki on TV. If TV time were only a national candidate concern – then Niki wasted her time going on the same Faux News as well.

        <

        p>
        2. “there’s no math anywhere that says the amount of people he’ll reach, never mind persuade, is even close to the amount of people he could see face to face, and probably a good deal more he could almost definately persuade;”

        <

        p>
        uhmmm – the amount of people who would see him at a ULowell class vs the amount of people who will see him over and over again on Fox. It’s been a while since I took a math class but I think TV wins.

        <

        p>
        Bad press? Bad press is Ogo debate performance reviews. This isn’t even a blip.

        <

        p>
        And this close to E Day it’s about visibility not convincing undecided.

        <

        p>
        We do agree that Ogo is losing but sorry, blowing off the ULowell class isn’t an admission of defeat. It politics 101 

        Log in to Reply
  7. sabutai says

    October 10, 2007 at 7:25 pm

    I agree that talking to voters under 30 (including me) is largely a waste of a candidate’s time given there voting record.

    <

    p>
    But FoxNews?  He’s going to find his additional voters by going on FoxNews, the greatest indicator of Republican voting trends that exists?  Any soul in Massachusetts-05 watching FoxNews is voting for Ogonowski already, so I’m not sure why he’s talking to them.  Had it been NECN, CNN, or MSNBC, I woulda known.  He may as well have held a press conference in his living room with his dogs and sofa in attendance.

    Log in to Reply
    • striker57 says

      October 10, 2007 at 7:33 pm

      and small as that base may be it is still better to talk to your base and try to get them excited and voting. Much better then 50 students with no media insight.

      Log in to Reply
  8. toms-opinion says

    October 10, 2007 at 7:59 pm

    as the lefties call it “faux” news yet the Repubs have no problem with Wolf Blitzer or the worlds most obnoxious liberal bully , Chris Mathews being  the moderator of the Republican debates???? Hmmmm? If Hilary, Barack or John Edwards  can’t handle a question from Bill O’reilly, how will they handle Vladimir Putin???…Kim Jong? Achmadshitbagan?
    Whoa..and these people call themselves “leaders”? and want to be President of the United States? Please…

    <

    p>
    PS.. cute question from the Mathews bully eh? Who is the prime minister of Canada?
    I would have loved to seen that trick ( try to make the repub look like a moron) question asked of Hilary or Obama… I think we would have heard a der, ah , emm can I choose another catagory Alex?…  LMAO!

    Log in to Reply
    • mr-lynne says

      October 10, 2007 at 8:35 pm

      … GOP talking point that CNN is at least as liberal as ‘fair and balanced’ Faux is conservative.

      <

      p>
      Not in the least.

      Log in to Reply
    • huh says

      October 10, 2007 at 8:58 pm

      Niki appeared on the same program as Ogo.

      <

      p>
      Chris Mathews is a bully?  Compared to O’Reilly?  Get a grip. 

      <

      p>
      What makes you think he wouldn’t have asked that of a Democrat, anyway?

      Log in to Reply
  9. toms-opinion says

    October 10, 2007 at 9:32 pm

    will at least appear, let alone debate, on Fox? After all Fox IS the #1 cable news network in America… What’s the problem Dems?  Pathetic.

    Log in to Reply
    • david says

      October 10, 2007 at 11:47 pm

      Log in to Reply
      • toms-opinion says

        October 11, 2007 at 12:38 pm

        Log in to Reply
        • mr-lynne says

          October 11, 2007 at 1:29 pm

          Log in to Reply
          • toms-opinion says

            October 11, 2007 at 4:16 pm

            Is that for propaganda reasons too? Fox ratings (# people watching) are larger than CNN, MSNBC and CNBC  COMBINED on a given night. One would think that politicians would jump at the chance of getting in front of the maximum # of voters .
            Dem refusal to appear on the Nations # 1 cable news network sends a clear message and it’s not a good one. Repubs have debated on CNN and been interogated by hostile liberal inquisitioners Wolf Blitzer and Chris Mathews. What are the Dems afraid of? If they’re afraid of O’Reilly, what happens when Vladmir Putin gets in their face? At least I’ll give credit to Sharpton and Jackson for appearing….more than can be said for Hilary and the rest of them.

            Log in to Reply
            • laurel says

              October 11, 2007 at 4:18 pm

              Log in to Reply
              • toms-opinion says

                October 11, 2007 at 5:20 pm

                1. It’s not a “news” channel despite that’s what it is called and listed as.
                2. It’s completely a right wing biased channel ( don’t forget to tell that to Alan Combes).
                3. Only right wing nut jobs appear ( don’t forget to remind Al Sharpton and Jesse J).

                <

                p>
                Maybe Ogo was hoping that a Fox national appearance might garner him some out of State contributions from out of State special interests like  Nicki is awash in? Better bet on that than going to UML to be bashed by brainwashed kids.

                <

                p>
                Does this answer the question or is it too complicated to grasp?

                Log in to Reply
                • laurel says

                  October 11, 2007 at 7:56 pm

                  but do you really think fox broadcasts MA-05 stuff in other states?  how many local non-MA races do you hear about on your local fox affiliate? 

                • toms-opinion says

                  October 11, 2007 at 8:44 pm

                  is “compartmentalized’ into ‘local” venue.. I honestly don’t know. It would be interesting to see what’s on Fox chan x in Indiana at the same time Fox  chan 69 is on here?

                  <

                  p>
                  Anybody out there know?

            • mr-lynne says

              October 11, 2007 at 7:43 pm

              … wow… we really are on different planets.

              Log in to Reply
              • toms-opinion says

                October 11, 2007 at 8:45 pm

                Log in to Reply
                • mr-lynne says

                  October 11, 2007 at 9:07 pm

                  … appropriate, then words will fail us at this point.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • Great economic news today (1)
  • IRA passes 51- 50! (1)
  • Real “Center” is Economically Nationalist/Culturally Moderate (1)

Recent User Posts

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 6 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Statement by President Biden on passage of the Inflation Reduction Act

August 7, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 1 Comment

Recent Comments

  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingThe Court has just given Trump until 3 pm tomorrow to ap…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingAG Garland just announced the search warrant has been un…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingI would not be surprised at all to learn that Trump deli…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingCould it also mean that KARM-A-LAGO might want to divert…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingIt's also amusing to hear Trump supporters blame an insi…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing"President Biden victories?" You mean, the greatest achi…
  • johntmay on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentstesting 1 2 3 Testing One Two Three

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

ukdarkemily14 Emily @ukdarkemily14 ·
58m

Online for a few hours 💗
#maptwt #mnswf #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557993197229559809 Retweet on Twitter 1557993197229559809 Like on Twitter 1557993197229559809 Twitter 1557993197229559809
phoebewalkerma Phoebe Walker @phoebewalkerma ·
1h

Furious and heartbroken that MA will limp forward after the pandemic with the same broken #localpublichealth system. How is it OK to let zip code decide health protections? #mapoli https://commonwealthmagazine.org/politics/lawmakers-advocates-hit-bakers-opt-in-approach-to-public-health/

Reply on Twitter 1557991482753171460 Retweet on Twitter 1557991482753171460 Like on Twitter 1557991482753171460 Twitter 1557991482753171460
legislataapp Legislata @legislataapp ·
1h

Tweet summary for MA State House for 2022-08-11: 300 tweets from 63 legislators. Top words: law, massgovernor, massachusetts, signed, climate, energy, day, senatorbarrett, jeffroy, baker. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557986818901016577 Retweet on Twitter 1557986818901016577 Like on Twitter 1557986818901016577 Twitter 1557986818901016577
courtwatchma CourtWatchMA @courtwatchma ·
2h

Oh.

#bospoli #mapoli

Michael Avitzur @MikeAvitzurBBA

... There should be supervision over those decisions by prosecutors, though. And the 58A law should be reformed.
Final Q.: How to enhance police integrity?
Hayden: We'll hold them accountable when they do wrong. No uniform or job status will preclude us from pursuing criminality.

Reply on Twitter 1557983236483080192 Retweet on Twitter 1557983236483080192 Like on Twitter 1557983236483080192 Twitter 1557983236483080192
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
2h

Butt her e-mails
meet
Top Secret nuke documents

#mapoli

🌊Biker Phill @PhillBiker

@TheLeoTerrell Why?

Search Warrants have a process that was followed. Is Trump above the law?

Why Trump didn’t collaborate? Since January he has been warned. What is he hiding?

Why the FBI was good against Hillary but bad against Trump?

Is Trump above the law?

Reply on Twitter 1557973006550532096 Retweet on Twitter 1557973006550532096 Like on Twitter 1557973006550532096 Twitter 1557973006550532096
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
4h

This guy believed Republican officials and Fox News Hosts who said @FBI and DOJ weaponized a search warrant against @realDonaldTrump. Armed with a nail gun and an AR-15 he went to the Cincinnati FBI Field Office where he died. He believed Trump about election 2020 too #mapoli

#SeditionHunters @SeditionHunters

Ricky Shiffer, who tried to breach an FBI office in Cincinnati today at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Reply on Twitter 1557951835998126080 Retweet on Twitter 1557951835998126080 Like on Twitter 1557951835998126080 Twitter 1557951835998126080
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.