Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

JudComm Chairman Leahy will oppose Mukasey, but Feinstein and Schumer will support

November 2, 2007 By David

This just in from Patrick Leahy:

Some issues are so critical, so fundamental to who and what we are as a nation, that we must act on our convictions — and this is one of them. America does not torture. We do not inflict cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. Certainly, we must do everything we can to prevent attacks on our nation, using appropriate interrogation techniques that require extensive questioning and thorough investigation. Waterboarding, however, is not one of these techniques.

In his confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Michael Mukasey was simply asked if waterboarding is illegal.  The fact that he could not provide a simple “Yes” to this question raises serious doubts about his ability to protect our basic rights.

My number one priority is to restore strong leadership and independence to an agency whose morale and image have been severely tainted. I wish that I could support Mr. Mukasey’s nomination, but I cannot.

Accordingly, when Michael Mukasey’s nomination comes to a vote before the Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, I will vote against it.

All well and good.  But, alas, Senators Feinstein (D-Cal.) and Schumer (D-N.Y.) will vote “yes.”  Which pretty much guarantees that the Mukasey nomination will move to the Senate floor, where it’s all but certain to be confirmed (unless someone changes their mind).  Schumer says that he hopes Mukasey’s “experience, independence and integrity, can restore the department.”  Right — ’cause Mukasey demonstrated those qualities so well at the hearings.  And as for Feinstein: “I believe that Judge Mukasey is the best we will get.”  Well, there’s a great reason to vote for someone.

Another shining moment for the Democrats.  *sigh*

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bush, democrats, mukasey

Comments

  1. amberpaw says

    November 2, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    “The best we can get” sounds like a dreadful reason to choose someone for Attorney General.  Does she really mean, “The best we can get from George W. Bush”??  If so, WHY put up with it?  What is the point of a Democratic Majority if they put up with mediocre appointments from George W. Bush without a fight?

  2. laurel says

    November 2, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    Isn’t it about time she come clean and cross the isle?  I mean really.

    • david says

      November 2, 2007 at 5:50 pm

      didn’t she used to be a liberal?  What happened?

      • marcus-graly says

        November 2, 2007 at 6:30 pm

        Feinstien has always been a fairly conservative Democrat, even when she was Mayor of San Fransisco.  It’s a source of endless frustration of us California lefties.

      • howland-lew-natick says

        November 2, 2007 at 7:11 pm

        She, through her husband’s company, has made a lot of money on the war.  It became an ethics issue when she was on the MILCON contracts committee.  I’m sure if she went against the Administration, she would lose financially as lucrative contracts would not come to Perini Corporation in Iraq and Afganistan. 

        <

        p>
        Just business, simply business.

      • michaelbate says

        November 2, 2007 at 10:37 pm

        She has supported the flag amendment and the death penalty!

        <

        p>
        Hardly my idea of a liberal.

      • alexwill says

        November 3, 2007 at 10:32 am

        I was a 4th-grader in the east SF bay at the time, and my family were recent immigrants from England who had just gotten permanent resident status. It’s the of my earliest political memories and they were focused on two things: the excitement about the Democratic presidential candidate Bill Clinton, and then the successful election of California’s first two female Senators, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein. My impression since then was that Boxer was the liberal and Feinstein was the conservative, and when we moved to Massachusetts I used to framework to think about Senators Kennedy and Kerry respectively. I think Kerry has changed recently, but Feinstein has not AFAIK.

        • marcus-graly says

          November 4, 2007 at 5:26 pm

          I was a 5th grader living in the East Bay in 1992 and my recollections are the same.  What city did you grow up in?

  3. eaboclipper says

    November 2, 2007 at 6:36 pm

    Remember his constituency was the hardest hit in 2001.

    <

    p>

    “Take the hypothetical: If we knew that there was a nuclear bomb hidden in an American city and we believed that some kind of torture, fairly severe maybe, would give us a chance of finding that bomb before it went off, my guess is most Americans and most senators, maybe all, would say, ‘Do what you have to do,'” Schumer said at a June 2004 Judiciary Committee hearing.

    <

    p>

    <

    p>
    Source: The Politico

    • kbusch says

      November 3, 2007 at 2:30 pm

      But as Hillary Clinton and others have pointed out, this hypothetical does not happen in the real world. It takes quite a few plot devices to know the guy who knows the Important Fact without knowing the Important Fact itself. Further, as legions of interrogators tell us, borrowing techniques from the communists aimed at extracting fake confessions — not at gaining truth — do not turn out to be even useful.

      <

      p>
      So this moral calculation is based on a near impossible If plus a stupid approach to interrogation. Stupidity meet Immorality. How do you do.

      <

      p>
      But doesn’t this hypothetical make an excellent soundbite! I bet one can run really scary attack ads based on that. I’m sure that’s why Rethuglican candidates just love it — love it!

      <

      p>
      I bet that’s why you love it, too, EaBo.

  4. amberpaw says

    November 2, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    That debate is as old as Nicola Micheavelli, isn’t it?  When do the means determine the ends, and even the nature of the society that uses them?  Anyway, great quote EABOGUY.

    • bob-neer says

      November 2, 2007 at 9:14 pm

      That’s not what he said even in The Prince. And he wrote a lot more than just The Prince. But maybe you are referring to the less well known Nicola Micheavelli. The name of the better known Italian renaissance philosopher is Nicolo Machiavelli.

  5. bob-neer says

    November 2, 2007 at 9:15 pm

    Too many of them have no guiding philosophy other than opportunism. At least Bush and Rove have a specific ideological agenda, as warped and destructive as it is. This is not the way to recover the reins of power.

    • kbusch says

      November 3, 2007 at 2:35 pm

      You generally advocate a non-ideological pragmatism and you consistently seem allergic to building out of liberalism a compelling ideology.

      <

      p>
      You can’t have it both ways. You can’t have a “guiding philosophy” that consists of the persistent application of Ad Hoc.

  6. cos says

    November 2, 2007 at 9:32 pm

    Will all of you call both of their offices on Monday morning?

  7. howland-lew-natick says

    November 5, 2007 at 8:53 pm

    From Connecticut.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.