Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Kerry [update] and Kennedy will vote “no” on Mukasey

November 1, 2007 By David

Three cheers!

“Judge Mukasey’s refusal to classify the barbaric practice of waterboarding as torture waves a red flag about his nomination to serve an Administration that has adhered to the Cheney doctrine on executive power and torture.  I am not comfortable confirming anyone who cannot see that this method of interrogation is antithetical to American values and traditions – especially not to a position that is charged with representing our entire justice system.  We need to reestablish faith in the Department of Justice.

“Many of us wanted to believe that Judge Mukasey could undo the damage of the Gonzales years. Unfortunately his lack of candor and his refusal to acknowledge this abuse of power suggest he is unable or unwilling to do so, and this is why I will be opposing Judge Mukasey’s nomination to be the next Attorney General of the United States.”

Let’s hope that Kerry, who isn’t on the Judiciary Committee, doesn’t even have the opportunity to make good on his promise — if the Committee dings Mukasey, that’s it for his nomination.

UPDATE: Senator Kennedy, who is on the JudComm, has announced that he too will vote “no.”  Excellent news.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bush, kerry, mukasey

Comments

  1. bob-neer says

    November 1, 2007 at 2:08 pm

    Well said, Senator.

  2. stomv says

    November 1, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    (No harm in counting votes now)

    • bannedbythesentinel says

      November 1, 2007 at 2:23 pm

      http://news.yahoo.co…

    • lateboomer says

      November 1, 2007 at 2:24 pm

      …so his position is even more critical than Kerry’s.  I don’t think he’s indicated how he’ll vote.

      • stomv says

        November 1, 2007 at 2:52 pm

        [see link above] and kudos for pointing out that he’s on the committee.

  3. mcrd says

    November 1, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    • laurel says

      November 1, 2007 at 3:32 pm

      the racist homophobe was voted through.

  4. tedf says

    November 1, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    if the Committee dings Mukasey, that’s it for his nomination.

    <

    p>
    Not necessarily. Remember, Bork’s nomination failed in committee but made it to the floor anyway, where it ultimately failed.

    <

    p>
    As I understand it, Sen. Reid will make the decision whether to send the nomination to the floor if it fails in the committee. What’s his view?

    <

    p>
    TedF

    • david says

      November 1, 2007 at 5:34 pm

      the committee voted to send Bork’s nomination to the floor, but with a recommendation that it be rejected.  But I’m not expert enough in the arcane rules of the Senate to know whether a committee vote not to send the nomination to the floor can be overridden by Reid.

      • david says

        November 1, 2007 at 5:36 pm

        In a potentially ominous sign for the administration, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., told reporters he could not guarantee a floor vote if Mukasey’s nomination fails in committee.

        “I really believe in the committee process,” said Reid, who has not announced how he would vote. “If I’m asked by members of the committee to stay out of the fray, I am willing to do that.”

  5. nomad943 says

    November 1, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    It only took them three weeks to figure out that torture was a no -no although it appears it took more arm twising to bring them around than anyone could have imagined. Brilliant … Such breathtaking action.
    so the vote should take 5 or 10 minutes.
    With all the major concerns that these clowns should be addressing, I wonder what they will be doing with the other 23 3/4 hours in the day or for that matter the rest of the days in the month or months in the year …
    Bahhhhh!!!

    • kbusch says

      November 1, 2007 at 6:21 pm

      It’s more complicated than that

      <

      p>
      First, Bush did send them someone who seemed more independent than the average Harriet Miers style appointee.

      <

      p>
      Being fair-minded people (and fair-minded people who are often accused of rank partisanship), they wanted to make certain that he was unacceptable. Note how he tried to weasel out of it. “That abhorrent!” he cried, but he never so much as whispered “That’s illegal.” He even tried to claim ignorance about water boarding. So they sent him information.

      <

      p>
      They were wrestling with an eel.

      The other problem is those centrist Democrats who are scared spitless that the mean Republicans will run attack ads against them and so they tend to cave on votes just like this. Unfortunately for us in the Bay State, the problem Senators in this regard are pretty far away — not counting Lieberman.

  6. johnk says

    November 1, 2007 at 11:26 pm

    TPM has the votes.

    <

    p>
    Kennedy – No
    Biden – No
    Durbin – No
    Whitehouse (Sheldon) – No

    <

    p>
    Schumer – undecided
    Leahy – undecided
    Feinstein – undecided
    Finegold – undecided
    Cardin – undecided
    Kohl – undecided

    <

    p>
    Specter – undecided

    <

    p>
    Brownback – Yes
    Coburn – Yes
    Cornyn – Yes
    Graham -Yes
    Grassley – Yes
    Hagel – Yes
    Kyl – Yes
    Sessions – Yes

    <

    p>
    So we need 6 out of the 7 undecideds.

  7. big-brother says

    November 3, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    Ted Kennedy: 

    <

    p>
    Against simulating drowning, for real drowning.

    <

    p>
    Mary Jo Kopechne, 1940-1969

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.