Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Sen. Obama’s rally in Manchester with Oprah Winfrey

December 12, 2007 By cmdrfoley

More than 8,500 Granite Staters from across New Hampshire descended on the Verizon Wireless Arena in Manchester Sunday night for a rally with Barack, Michelle and special guest Oprah Winfrey.

The event added a boost of momentum and organizational strength to a campaign that is quickly gaining ground in New Hampshire.  In the week preceding the event:

  • More than 650 new volunteers signed up to help the campaign
  • More than 500 supporters volunteered in the lead-up to the rally
  • More than 250 volunteers worked on-site at the event
  • More than 2,300 new New Hampshire supporters joined the campaign

Tim Foley

Proud to be a NH staff member for Barack Obama’s movement for change.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: barack-obama, new-hampshire, oprah-winfrey

Comments

  1. sabutai says

    December 12, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    Obama is doing a great job harvesting names, addresses, e-mail addresses, and cell phone numbers from anyone who comes to these events.  All candidacies are trying to do this, but Obama is doing extremely well at it.  Todd Beeton — hardly an Obamfrey maniac, writes up the details at Mydd.

    <

    p>~~~~
    Stuff I don’t say here, I say here.

    • sabutai says

      December 12, 2007 at 9:12 pm

      Obama’s attempt to convince non-Iowan supporters to caucus for him in Iowa may obviate the need to be popular among Iowans.

      <

      p>As reported in the Washington Post and elsewhere, Obama’s campaign is sending out flyers that tell college students “If you are not from Iowa, you can come back for the Iowa caucus and caucus in your college neighborhood.”

      <

      p>Iowa allows same-night caucus registration without requiring proof of residence in the state.  While Clinton, Dodd, Richardson, and others are warning their supporters away unless they possess an Iowa pedigree, Obama isn’t.

      <

      p>Dean of Iowa political reporting David Yepsen has responded in the Des Moines Register that “Maybe we should call these the Illinois caucuses.”  Pissing off Yepsen is never a good idea, and setting the stage to taint any victory in Iowa is a worse one.

      • alexwill says

        December 12, 2007 at 10:52 pm

        Biden, like Dodd and Clinton, is also suggesting college students can’t vote in Iowa, but at least Richardson seems to not been actively pushing this like the other 3.

        <

        p>see http://www.bluehampshire.com/s… for more

        • theopensociety says

          December 13, 2007 at 12:56 pm

          for your statement comment that “Biden, like Dodd and Clinton, is also suggesting college students can’t vote in Iowa.”  Just curious.

          • alexwill says

            December 13, 2007 at 1:27 pm

            The dKos article on this topic has most of the information (the Blue Hampshire link just links to article and discusses) and has a quote from the Biden press release on this:

            <

            p>

            his weekend, the Biden campaign issued a press release in which it dishonestly blurred the difference between paid staffers who moved to Iowa and students:

               Following reports that Gov. Richardson is “asking governmental appointees and other state employees to volunteer to help his campaign by traveling to Iowa before the Jan. 3 leadoff presidential contest,” and that Sen. Obama is encouraging out of state college students to “come back and caucus,” the Biden for President campaign today called on Richardson and Obama to join the rest of the Democratic field in pledging to refrain from shipping in supporters to affect the outcome of the caucuses. [Associated Press, 12/6/07], [Associated Press, 12/5/07]

               “Historically, the Iowa caucuses have been critical in leveling the playing field by producing viable candidates based on the strength of their ideas and character – because that’s precisely what’s needed to ensure a Democratic victory in the general election,” said Biden for President Communications Director Larry Rasky. “The absurd amount of money we’ve seen in this race already endangers this tradition and mocks our values as Democrats. Gov. Richardson and Sen. Obama have a responsibility to place the people of Iowa before their personal ambitions and pledge not to tamper with the caucuses that will largely determine who is best equipped to tackle both the Republican nominee as well as the challenges before our country.”

            Having out-of-state staffers participate in the caucus is indeed a shady business in which no campaign should actively engage, but this is hardly equivalent to Obama’s encouragement of Iowa students to return to Iowa early to participate in the caucus.  I’ve said it four or five times already, but I’ll say it again.  These students have the legal right to caucus.  They pay taxes in Iowa.  They live in Iowa 9 months a year for at least 4 years.  Some of them will stay in Iowa permanently.  No one should actively dissuade them or try to muddy the waters and confuse them about their rights to caucus.  All due respect to Senator Biden, but that, more than anything else, mocks our values as Democrats and his campaign should be ashamed.

            • theopensociety says

              December 13, 2007 at 3:27 pm

              The section you posted does not mention Hillary Clinton.  Here is the quote from her campaign contained in the dKos article you linked to:

              <

              p>”The Iowa caucus is so special because it is based on Iowa values. We believe that every Iowan and every student who is eligible to caucus in Iowa should do so and we hope they do.”

              <

              p>Hardly a suggestion that students cannot vote in Iowa.  The dKos poster’s spin on this quote is disingenuous.  Also, the story about the student calling one of the Clinton campaign offices and not getting a call back indicates the dKos poster has not been involved in very many campaigns at the grassroots level.  The people answering the phones in most local campaign offices are volunteers, not campaign representatives.
               

      • davesoko says

        December 12, 2007 at 11:26 pm

        When I moved here to Brighton to attend college, I changed my voter registration, so I wouldn’t have to bother with an absentee ballot. The first chance I got to exercise my right to vote in my new neighborhood was in the spring 2005 MA house special election to replace Brian Golden.

        <

        p>I, and dozens of other rent-paying, tax-paying Brighton residents who happen to be Boston University undergraduates were challenged at the polls by members of the Boston Ward 22 Democratic Committee, who told us we did not have the right to vote, though we were registered. They managed to verbally intimidate a number of people into leaving the polls without voting with threats of prosecution, possibly influencing the result of the race, which was decided by 40 votes.

        <

        p>I approached both my city councilor and my state rep about what had happened, and both were incredibly helpful. My councilman actually joined me for a meeting with the head of the Boston elections department, who promised to resolve the problem ASAP by moving the BPD officers who had been stationed inside the buildings where the voting took place to outside as well.

        <

        p>We’ve never had another problem like that since.

        <

        p>So, I simply have this to say to ANYONE who is registered to vote where they live, but is told they are not allowed to: DONT BUY IT.

        <

        p>Exercise your constitutional right to vote.

        <

        p>NO ONE can take that away from you.

        • sabutai says

          December 13, 2007 at 7:33 am

          You and your friends were properly registered voters unfamiliar to an insular group of people at the polls, and I regret they chose that path.  However, you were not violating the law.

          <

          p>It is easy to see that mailer as encouraging supporters to violate the law and take advantage of the honor system used in the caucuses.

          • marc-davidson says

            December 13, 2007 at 8:35 am

            particularly young voters who are inclined to vote for Dems.
            The Iowa law is very clear about eligibility for registration. “Out of state” students can register where they reside. The only restriction is that they not vote in two jurisdictions. Iowa makes it easy, as it should, to get residents to participate by allowing registration even on the day of the caucuses.
            You’re on the wrong side of this one, sabutai, all the left-wing groups in Iowa come down on the side of full rights for all residents. Even the Democratic Party of Iowa gets it right.
            Hillary Clinton needs to repudiate this strategy asap. It smacks of the disenfranchising efforts of the Republicans.

            • theopensociety says

              December 13, 2007 at 12:58 pm

              has a strategy to stop students from voting in Iowa.  Sounds like Repbulican smear tactics.  

            • sabutai says

              December 13, 2007 at 3:54 pm

              We’re not talking about if college students are allowed to vote, we’re talking about requiring citizens to vote near where they live.  It is not disenfranchisement to suggest you vote where you live, it’s preserving democratic values.  

              <

              p>The problem isn’t the idea that Obama wants his people to caucus for him, the problem is that Obama is leaving the door open for his supporters who live in Iowa to caucus for him, even if they are registered elsewhere.  

              <

              p>(And your attempt to shoehorn a Hillary boogeyman into this makes no sense.)

          • davesoko says

            December 13, 2007 at 6:32 pm

            So, assuming your Iowa college student stops at the voter reg. table first on the way in on caucus day, and changes his/her registration from the state where he/she grew up to reflect where they live now in Iowa, where is the problem?

            <

            p>In fact, I’ve always heard that my above scenario was one of the strongest arguments we’ve got for same-day voter reg: it will increase the number of transient young people who vote, which wouldl be good because

            <

            p>1) higher turnout = healthier democracy, and

            <

            p>b) younger people overwhelmingly vote for Democrats

            <

            p>look, believe me, there are mannnyyyy people I know and go to school with who care about politics enough to vote, just not enough to go to city hall 6 weeks before election day to re-register every time they change addresses. If we modify the registration process to make it less of a pain in the rear, more of them will vote. period.  

            • leonidas says

              December 14, 2007 at 7:01 pm

              because no proof of residence is required.

              <

              p>The problem is non-Iowans attempting skewing the results of a caucus designed for Iowans. The fact that certain campaigns are publicly encouraging FRAUD is very telling of their respect for the democratic process.

              <

              p>I doubt, though, that a significant number of out-of-state college students would stay or return to Iowa during their breaks in order to caucus for Obama.

            • raj says

              December 16, 2007 at 8:52 am

              look, believe me, there are mannnyyyy people I know and go to school with who care about politics enough to vote, just not enough to go to city hall 6 weeks before election day to re-register every time they change addresses

              <

              p>is easily handled.  Get the town clerks to set up (re-)registration tables on college campuses for a couple of days prior to the end of the registration period.

              <

              p>I’m somewhat learly of allowing transients to potentially control a town’s election results, but that’s another issue.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.