Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Sloppy DNA databanks

September 8, 2008 By ACLUm blog

If you weren’t sure what would happen to it or how it might eventually be used, would that make you more likely or less likely to voluntarily provide a DNA sample for a criminal investigation?

That’s the point behind a great Globe editorial today.  The way investigators have handled DNA samples collected as part of the investigation of Christa Worthington’s murder on the Cape has not been reassuring.

The ACLU of Massachusetts has sued to stop the creation of a “shadow” databank of DNA profiles, and last month, one of our clients got his DNA sample back.  That’s a step in the right direction, but it’s not just the samples that matter.  The DNA profiles created from the samples need to be addressed as well.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: aclu, privacy

Comments

  1. johnd says

    September 8, 2008 at 10:50 am

    Don’t you want criminals to be caught?

    • laurel says

      September 8, 2008 at 11:56 am

      is best for ruling out suspects, not fingering the guilty.  DNA as it is used today cannot identify an individual.  It merely tells you the odds that a certain person and anyone else in the population sharing a common set of markers left their DNA at the crime scene.

      <

      p>The question you really should be asking is
      “How can DNA evidence be legitimately used by law enforcement?”

      • johnd says

        September 8, 2008 at 12:15 pm

        DNA can be used in many ways. With a database of people’s DNA and a good sample, you certainly could search the FBI’s CODIS database and find people. They do it daily.  It can be used for either matching or not matching.

        <

        p>Here’s a great site for a primer on how DNA is used by law enforcement to identify RAPE SUSPECTS.

        <

        p>I’m sure Laurel the Lib can find a great site where DNA can be used as exculpatory evidence.

        <

        p>And remember, DNA evidence on the scene (or the victim) doesn’t prove anything. If someone is raped and the DNA does not match, it doesn’t prove the suspect DIDN’T rape her so a non-match simply removed the DNA evidence and does not EXCLUDE the suspect from being guilty. However, a positive match certainly proves the person was present but not much else. That’s my opinion only since I am neither a cop, a DNA expert or a lawyer.

        <

        p>

        Using DNA Evidence
        Given the high profile of DNA evidence during the O.J. Simpson trial, most people know that DNA profiles are used by criminal investigators to:

        Prove guilt – Matching DNA profiles can link a suspect to a crime or crime scene.

        Exonerate an innocent person – Innocent people have been freed from death row in the United States based on DNA evidence. So far, DNA evidence has been almost as useful in excluding suspects as in fingering and convicting them; about 30 percent of DNA profile comparisons done by the FBI result in excluding someone as a suspect.

        DNA evidence is also useful beyond the criminal courtroom in:

        Paternity testing and other cases where authorities need to prove whether or not individuals are related – One of the more infamous paternity cases of late revolved around a 1998 paper in the journal “Nature” that studied whether or not Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States, fathered children with one of his slaves.

        • laurel says

          September 8, 2008 at 12:36 pm

          “Laurel the Lib”

          • johnd says

            September 8, 2008 at 2:17 pm

            Why are people so uptight? If you ever have the notion to call me JohnD the Righty… by all means GO FOR IT. I don’t care and would probably laugh. KB is always calling me names and who cares. The only difference is she or others call me names and then I laugh AND reply to their comments. You (and others) send a little blurb about your outrage and then IGNORE the issue. Is there a Latin term for that maneuver? What gives? For future reference, should I assume you are too stuffy for humor? Should I reply in a formal manner? And what gives with the “Latin” on this site? I’m continually having to look up shit. Luckily I now realize you guys throw Latin terms around other than my first inclination that you had bad keyboards or plain couldn’t spell.

    • eury13 says

      September 8, 2008 at 12:07 pm

      Here’s an issue where we are likely to agree: the government should not be cataloging and databasing everyone’s DNA. When DNA samples are collected, the DNA should be properly handled and then, when no longer needed, destroyed.

      <

      p>And yet, despite the fact that we are probably on the same side on this one, you still feel the need to post some sarcastic, bitter nonsense intended to mock and denigrate the left that only further widens the rift between left and right and makes it that much more difficult to engage in civil discourse.

      <

      p>Unless you were serious, in which case we can actually have that discussion. But somehow I don’t think that’s the case.

      • johnd says

        September 8, 2008 at 2:38 pm

        I hope not since I don’t agree that the government should NOT becataloging everyone’s DNA?

        <

        p>Also, are you saying my remark..

        <

        p>

        I’m sure Laurel the Lib can find a great site where DNA can be used as exculpatory evidence.

        <

        p>was as you put it…

        <

        p>

        you still feel the need to post some sarcastic, bitter nonsense intended to mock and denigrate the left that only further widens the rift between left and right and makes it that much more difficult to engage in civil discourse.

        <

        p>If this is what you are refering to, would you mnd telling me me “identifying” someone as a liberal and then implying that they wpould e looking for using DNA as a defense (check out their original comments) is sarcastic, bitter nonsense intended to mock and denigrate the left

        <

        p>BULLSHIT!!! Anytime this site wants to throw down the gauntlet and become a civil, thought provoking, non-aggressive, non-attacking, fact-based, reaching across the aisle site, I’ll be second in line to go by those rules. When does the civil “constructive” discussion begin?

        <

        p>

        • mr-lynne says

          September 8, 2008 at 3:20 pm

          … to see a ‘constructive discussion coming from your direction.

    • tblade says

      September 8, 2008 at 6:04 pm

      …except when I’m not.”

      <

      p>How one can rage against government spending and its growth and then consistently be for programs that would increase the size and budget of government is baffling.  

  2. johnd says

    September 8, 2008 at 3:43 pm

    I posted something last week concerning Illegal Immigration. Now obviously the point of “discussion” would mostly revolve around issues which people feel differently or have opposing views. I happen to have a view on ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION which is traditional and varies greatly from many on this site. I stress the ILLEGAL part since opponants try to quickly paint anyone against ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION as being against Immigration which I am not. As we hear so often… we are all immigrants or from imigrants.

    <

    p>Now just because we disagree on this does that mean it’s not “constructive”. It’s a big issue that has to be addressed. Many Americans believe it is a huge issue and in fact are not happy about McCain’s view on it.

    • mr-lynne says

      September 8, 2008 at 5:30 pm

      http://vps28478.inmotionhosting.com/~bluema24/showC…

      <

      p>Ditto

      • johnd says

        September 8, 2008 at 8:14 pm

        I’m not playing that game. You simply said

        <

        p>

        I have yet … to see a ‘constructive discussion coming from your direction.

        <

        p>And I gave what I thought was a good example of a post worth discussing. You replied with a pointer to another vitriolic spew from lightiris (whom I really think needs some help).

        <

        p>You and others here are blind, blind to the venom that comes out of YOUR mouths everyday. Blind to one sided bias that skews your interpretation of every news item, every issue and removes your sense of humor as well.

        <

        p>We can talk about Illegal Immigration but just for the record watch the viscous attacks I will receive and the rancor directed at “ANYONE” against the idea of NOT enforcing the law.

        <

        p>I don’t know how typical it is but I feel many people on this site “give up” easily.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.