Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Is this the knockout blow?

October 19, 2008 By Sean

On Meet the Press this morning, Colin Powell said:

I’ll be voting for Senator Barack Obama.

The endorsement isn’t much of a surprise. And, it probably won’t have much of an effect, save to give Obama the next few news cycles, which McCain can’t afford to lose.

But, Powell’s seven-minute introduction to those seven words is a thoughtful, dispassionate, well-reasoned summary of the campaign and of the choice that America has. And it’s just a devastating — and irrebuttable* — takedown of McCain. You must watch it. (No embed link, yet. Thanks, sabutai.)

*I write “irrebuttable” knowing full well that McCain and his surrogates will certainly give it the college try. We can expect a few days of fun watching Tucker Bounds and Nancy Pfotenhauer tie themselves in knots trying to explain why nobody should care what Colin Powell says. (Washed up old patriot?) In some ways, Powell has put them in a no-win position. Any attack on Powell will just confirm his judgment of their campaign.

UPDATE (by David): Here is Powell outside the NBC studios immediately after his TV appearance.  Well worth watching.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: endorsement, mccain, obama, powell

Comments

  1. sabutai says

    October 19, 2008 at 11:02 am

    Apparently, Powell is another “not real America” who does not live in a “pro-American” part of the country.

    <

    p>

    • mcrd says

      October 19, 2008 at 5:39 pm

      Does the word hypocrisy mean anything?

      <

      p>personally I love Powell and would folow him most anywhere. If he wants to follow Obama, that’s his business—–That’s one place I won’t go.

      <

      p>Throwing the Israeli’s to the wolves is pretty lousy as well, but that what Wright and Farrakhan want—-he—this is politics right?

      • sabutai says

        October 19, 2008 at 7:58 pm

        …is the belief in redemption.

    • kirth says

      October 19, 2008 at 5:48 pm

      No “hypocrisy” here, MRCD.

      Let’s just remember: Colin Powell is one of the major reasons we went to war in Iraq. In his 2003 United Nations speech, he perpetrated one of the biggest frauds in the history of international diplomacy – a deliberate and calculated fraud that, in terms of its blood-and-guts ramifications, dwarfs major scandals like Watergate. Sure, there were certainly other Bush officials who helped get us into war. But to deny that Colin Powell was a major factor in sending us into a war based on lies is to quite literally deny that the sky is blue.

      • billxi says

        October 20, 2008 at 2:21 pm

         I watched Powell’s testimony to the UN. I was amazed by the scrupulous attention to detail. If that was true, we needed to stop that madman. However we’re still looking for the WMDs. I think Powell gave John Kerry lying lessons. I wish Kerry would go back home to Pennsylvania. He lives there m,ore than here.

  2. billxi says

    October 19, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    As delicately as I can. I do not mean any offense toward anyone. “Bbros before hos”. But at least Powell said an arbitrary time line was stupid.

    • david says

      October 19, 2008 at 1:28 pm

      Powell endorsed Obama because they’re both black.  That’s what you’re saying, I take it.

      <

      p>Really a disgusting sentiment, and as racist as anything I’ve seen on this site in the four years it’s been in operation.  I will, however, leave it up so that everyone can see it.  Sunlight is a fine disinfectant.

      • edgarthearmenian says

        October 19, 2008 at 2:18 pm

        David,
          Good, let some sunshine in.  A lot of people whom I have talked with this morning happen to agree with billxi, and they are not racists.  Reverse racism is probably not the reason that Powell is endorsing Obama, but the percentage of minorities that is proclaiming his candidacy certainly gives reason to pose the question.  David, are you a slave to political correctness?  By the way, I was an undecided, but I will be voting for Obama, so please don’t lay the racist tag on me.  Let the sunshine all the way in.

        • david says

          October 19, 2008 at 2:47 pm

          Maybe not by your definition.

          <

          p>As for your obsession with the height of my horse, I’ll repeat what I’ve said before: the air up here is just fine, thanks.

          • billxi says

            October 20, 2008 at 11:43 pm

            Myself. I am not sorry for posing the tough statements. They need to be said. BTW, Mr. Kerry better hire some more staffers to stand out for him. Jeff Beatty kicked the snot out of his nose-in the-air at the NECN debate tonight. Don’t be surprised if Kerry wimps out next Monday. Not all of us can afford to be democrats.

            • mr-lynne says

              October 21, 2008 at 12:38 pm

              I don’t think anyone here is surprised.

        • dmac says

          October 19, 2008 at 5:30 pm

          long been loyal to the Democratic Party, now all of a sudden it’s reverse racism because Blacks are supporting a Black Democrat? Give me a break.

          • mcrd says

            October 19, 2008 at 5:46 pm

            What would the rant be then. At least be intellectually honest. The rant would be that a huge proportion of whites.hispanis/whomever were racists. But on the other hand 98% of blacks are out for “their guy.” Hey—I don’t hold that against them, in Boston the irish vote Irish, blacks for blacks, Italians for Italians, but folks don’t run around screaming that they are rascists or xenophobes or anti ethnic  blah, blah, blah.

            <

            p>You get the point. Labelling someone a racist because they make a comment is BS

      • kbusch says

        October 19, 2008 at 2:32 pm

        Townhall’s Stephen Ohlemacher:

        At the same time, Powell is a black man and Obama would be the nation’s first black president. Powell said he was cognizant of the racial aspect of his endorsement, but said that was not the dominant factor in his decision. If it was, he said, he would have made the endorsement months ago.

        Someone must have asked that question. The comments, of course, are full of billixisms:

        It is pretty clear..
        ..that either Colin Powell is a closet socialist, he is a black racist (in that he will vote for his race over policies), or he has turned into an idiot. Or a combination of any.

        Disappointing; but in these times, not surprising.

        • edgarthearmenian says

          October 19, 2008 at 3:09 pm

          Since when is it a crime to ask a question?  

          • kbusch says

            October 19, 2008 at 3:22 pm

            Where is it a crime, Edgarthearmenian? Do tell.

    • tblade says

      October 19, 2008 at 3:11 pm

      …is not capable of free, independent thought and the only reason this four-star general and former Secretary of State could possible endorse a Democrat is because of skin color. Forget his seven-minute explanation of his position, just boil it down to a simple phrase that simple minds can grasp without putting the extra effort of honesty and contemplation. Oh, OK.

      <

      p>Translation: I don’t like what Powell said, so I will petulantly fabricate an arbitrary excuse to explain away circumstances that inconveniently contradict my view of how Republicans and former military leaders should act and think.  

      <

      p>Let me put this as delicately as I can: falsely accusing Powell of playing the “Bbros before hos”* line is just as bigoted and racist as if Powell actually favored McCain’s politics but was voting for Obama based on skin color. So, even if Powell was secretly voting for Obama just because of shared pigmentation you would have no high ground to rebuke such an action.

      <

      p>If Powell is supporting Obama because he’s a “brother”, can we assume that all the White people who are voting for and supporting McCain are doing so because he is White? Are you supporting John McCain and Palin beause it is an all-White ticket? Is Lieberman?

      <

      p>————
      *When you correct other peoples’ spelling in other threads, it’s not good form to make spelling errors of your own. It makes you look sillier than you already do.

      • sabutai says

        October 19, 2008 at 7:59 pm

        Perhaps billxi was chronicling Powell’s well-known adversion to gardening.

        <

        p>Either that, or he is accusing McCain of secretly being a sexually promiscuous woman.

        • tblade says

          October 19, 2008 at 9:45 pm

  3. danseidman says

    October 19, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    I doubt it will change that many minds — it is hard to understand just what it is that will make the difference to undecideds — but Powell is extremely eloquent and incisive here.  His point about what anti-Islamic bigotry in the US does to our standing in the world is a great point from someone who understands this issue.

    <

    p> – Dan

    • mollypat says

      October 20, 2008 at 10:46 am

      I’m thinking specifically of supporters of Hillary who have not been able to wrap their minds around this young man Obama.  One conversation stands out in my mind: I was talking with an older woman who, in order to assure me that her objections were not based in prejudice, told me she would vote for Colin Powell in a minute but was unsure about Obama.  This endorsement is going to make a big difference to her and her friends.

  4. cambridge_paul says

    October 19, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    to hear Mr. Powell tackle the issue of anti-Muslim sentiment in America that has been exacerbated by members of his own party.  

    • kbusch says

      October 19, 2008 at 2:34 pm

      how he linked it to the needs of conducting successful diplomacy.

      • bladerunner says

        October 19, 2008 at 4:11 pm

        I felt his comments were eloquent and logically thought out. This is the vision of the country that we are fighting for. Kudos to Powell!

    • mcrd says

      October 19, 2008 at 5:53 pm

      A spreading contagion—-protected by our constitution and we will rue the day.

      <

      p>The US Constitution states that I am entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. “Some muslims” wish to deny me that privilege. The only way to resolve the rub and protect ME is to turn USA into a police state. We no longer have the luxury of being reactive, which our police forces are now, we must be proactive.

      <

      p>Interesting proposition.  

      • ryepower12 says

        October 19, 2008 at 6:07 pm

        MCRD… that’s Crazy Talk. That’s the kind of crazy talk that leads to points in humanity’s history that I think the bulk of us would rather forget.

        <

        p>Are “some Muslims” the type that would want to deny you that liberty? I’ve never met any of them in America, but if there are some, they’re no worse than you who would want to deny THEM – and millions of innocent people along with them – their constitutional rights within these borders. People are innocent until proven guilty in this country for a reason – what you’re suggesting is to even skip the accusation, never mind the trial, and deport wholesale the millions of ‘radical’ Muslims, many or most of whom were probably born here.

        <

        p>Meanwhile, what do you propose we do about all the radical Christians that would seek to deny me my right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness – by legislating their faith into our law books and devestating the lives of untold millions in the process? Not only are your words hate speech and crazy talk, but they’re also oozing hypocrisy.

      • tblade says

        October 19, 2008 at 9:16 pm

        <

        p>Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, CPL, US Army.

  5. kbusch says

    October 19, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    Roundtable: note particularly Gingrich’s and Will’s comments.

  6. sean-roche says

    October 19, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    as a compliment.

    Senator Obama has demonstrated the kind of calm, patient, intellectual, steady approach to problem-solving that I think we need in this country.

    • mr-lynne says

      October 19, 2008 at 4:35 pm

      … offered by so many pundits as some kind of faint praise:

      <

      p>

      “I thought Obama was flat, professorial, didn’t rise to the occasion,” said Bennett, who holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Texas at Austin, a law degree from Harvard University, is a former chairman of the esteemed National Endowment for the Humanities, and was – believe it or not – secretary of education under President Ronald Reagan.

      … Professorial must be the insult of the season. Adam Nagourney and Jeff Zeleny of The New York Times even invoked an academic criticism of McCain’s performance after the first debate. “Again and again, sounding almost like a professor talking down to a new student, he talked about having to explain foreign policy to Mr. Obama,” Nagourney and Zeleny wrote.

  7. kirth says

    October 19, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    theme.
    http://crooksandliars.com/nico…

    <

    p>Will claims that Obama gains two votes for being Black for every one he loses. I think George doesn’t get out much.

  8. mcrd says

    October 19, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    For the first time, the U.S. Army has designated an active-duty unit stationed at home to serve as a federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.

    <

    p>The 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team, which has spent 35 of the past 60 months in Iraq, began its new assignment on Oct. 1.

    <

    p>The unit could be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control, or to deal with the chaos following an earthquake or a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear attack.

    <

    p>”We’ve been all over the world during this time of conflict, but now our mission is to take care of citizens at home.”

    <

    p>Well—if I catch one in the back of my squash, I’ll have the consolation that it is coming from the “good guys”, acting on the behest of our new Commander in Chief.

    <

    p>

  9. ryepower12 says

    October 19, 2008 at 5:59 pm

    • jconway says

      October 19, 2008 at 6:33 pm

      A well thought out courageous endorsement from a great public servant. While this does not make up for the low point of Powell’s distinguished career, his UN appearance, it does confirm what the public is seeming to think which is that McCains campaign is divisive and corrosive and Obama is truly a transformational figure able to bring together different perspectives and move this country forward. A very important and the most touching part of the interview came when Powell said he knew Obama was not a Muslim, but that it wouldn’t matter if he was since plenty of Muslim Americans have also sacrificed for this country. He was really the first mainstream person to go out and finally say that. Most people just say Obama is not a Muslim, few go out of there way to also assert that if he was it wouldnt matter anyway. Very important endorsement.

  10. bob-neer says

    October 19, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    Powell is a tragic figure. A lifetime of success based on service and, in the end, also the destruction of his reputation based on service. His critical mistake was to serve George W. Bush for too long. He got used, and his patriotism was taken advantage of, in my opinion.

    <

    p>In any event, this can only help Obama, but I don’t think it is by any circumstances a knock-out blow. The only knock out blow will be a victory on 4 November.

    • sabutai says

      October 19, 2008 at 8:01 pm

      Powell seems to be an embodiment of the tragedy of America under Bush.  Good faith poorly exploited, sadder but wiser for the experience.  Had Powell lost his house, the comparison would be eerie.

      • mplo says

        October 20, 2008 at 12:41 am

        that, as several other posters here on BMG have pointed out, Colin Powell is one who really helped get us into both Gult Wars and into Iraq, illegally and based on lies.    

        <

        p>Barack Obama, who stated that he opposed our Iraq war, unfortunately also vowed to continue funding it.  In either case–not good, imho.

        • mr-lynne says

          October 20, 2008 at 9:17 am

          … is (or at least was) a yes man.  For some reason (probably owing to his media exposure during Gulf War I) he became a yes man that the public had confidence in.  (Few people at that point had heard of anything called “the Powell doctrine”.)  For that reason he became a ‘must get’ guy for Bush in 2000.  The fact that the neocons had no intention of actually letting him do anything wasn’t the point.  He allowed himself to be used as a result of his loyalty reflex.  It could be argued that, because he wasn’t on the same team in the neocons’ minds, him becoming SOS greatly exacerbated the gutting of the State Department’s role in administration foreign policy.  The next SOS will have to survey the damage.

          <

          p>Recommended reading on Powell:  Rise of the Vulcans and The One Percent Doctrine.

          • mplo says

            October 21, 2008 at 12:26 pm

            This:

            <

            p>

            “He allowed himself to be used as a result of his loyalty reflex.”

             

            <

            p>points it out, in a nutshell.  Colin Powell was used, abused and then hung out to dry by the Bush Administration.  So was Condi Rice, for that matter.  

            <

            p>Back to the subject of Colin Powell;  there’s no escapting the fact that Powell wes a major player in getting the United States involved and embroiled in Iraq in the first place….both times.

            • centralmassdad says

              October 21, 2008 at 3:11 pm

              Seems to me to make the Iraq thing better, or at least less bad, for Powell.

              • mplo says

                October 22, 2008 at 10:57 am

                I was just stating a couple of facts, which I don’t think should be forgotten.

    • goldsteingonewild says

      October 20, 2008 at 2:06 pm

      Look at today’s follow-up coverage.  

      <

      p>The story is now “Was this endorsement because of race?”

      <

      p>And I feel when the news cycle is about the economy, Obama trends highest; when the news cycle is about race in any form or shape, no matter how he handles it, Obama trends lowest.  

      <

      p>

      • christopher says

        October 20, 2008 at 10:24 pm

        When Joe Lieberman crossed party lines to endorse McCain, nobody said, “Well, it must be because they are both white.”  Frankly, neither Powell nor Obama is identified politically as black in the way that, say, Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson are.  In other words, when we think of them we do not automatically think first of their race (or is that just me?).  For that matter the same goes for Deval Patrick; neither Patrick nor Obama was ever “the black candidate and Powell was never thought to have been an affirmative action appointee.  This is all a long way of saying that race isn’t an issue, or at least shouldn’t be.  I see this as one more step toward judging by the content of one’s character than the color of one’s skin.

  11. peabody says

    October 20, 2008 at 4:02 am

     
    I was so pleased on Sunday to hear  former Secretary of State Colin Powell indicate that he felt Barack Obama was the best choice for president and he (Powell) would be voting for Barack.

    <

    p>I worked under General Powell.  He has tremendous military, diplomatic,  and civilian experience.  His endorsement means a great deal to our efforts, but we need to keep up the canvassing and phone banking!

    <

    p>                              YES WE CAN!

    <

    p>                           GO OBAMA-BIDEN!

  12. centralmassdad says

    October 21, 2008 at 3:19 pm

    Here is a guy who thinks that the Powell, along with the Adelman, endorsements make him unhappy with the Obama nomination.

    <

    p>”Its conservatives who should be cheering.” he says.  Andrew Sullivan writes:  “We are.”

    <

    p>I could care less about Adelman.  But I still have some respect for Colin Powell, and am pleased by the endorsement.

    <

    p>But I’m no progressive.  Does this give y’all heart palpitations?

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.